Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine and Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, Baltimore, MD 21228, USA.
Biol Psychiatry. 2013 Jul 15;74(2):130-6. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.12.022. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
Decision-making studies show that response selection is influenced by the "effort cost" associated with response alternatives. These effort-cost calculations seem to be mediated by a distributed neural circuit including the anterior cingulate cortex and subcortical targets of dopamine neurons. On the basis of evidence of dysfunction in these systems in schizophrenia (SZ), we examined whether effort-cost computations were impaired in SZ patients and whether these deficits were associated with negative symptoms.
Effort-cost decision-making performance was evaluated in 44 patients with SZ and 36 demographically matched control subjects. Subjects performed a computerized task where they were presented with a series of 30 trials in which they could choose between making 20 button presses for $1 or 100 button presses for higher amounts (varying from $3 to $7 across trials). Probability of reward receipt was also manipulated to determine whether certain (100%) or uncertain (50%) reward affected effort-based decision-making.
Patients were less likely than control subjects to select the high-effort response alternative during the 100% probability condition, particularly when the value payoff was highest (i.e., $6 and $7). Patients were also less likely to select the high-effort option on trials after reward in the 50% probability condition. Furthermore, these impairments in effort-cost computations were greatest among patients with elevated negative symptoms. There was no association with haloperidol equivalent dosage.
The motivational impairments of SZ might be associated with abnormalities in estimating the "cost" of effortful behavior. This increased effort cost might undermine volition.
决策研究表明,反应选择受到与反应选择相关的“努力成本”的影响。这些努力成本的计算似乎是由包括前扣带皮层和多巴胺神经元的皮质下靶标在内的分布式神经回路介导的。基于精神分裂症(SZ)患者这些系统功能障碍的证据,我们研究了 SZ 患者的努力成本计算是否受损,以及这些缺陷是否与阴性症状有关。
对 44 名 SZ 患者和 36 名年龄匹配的对照受试者进行了努力成本决策表现的评估。受试者进行了一项计算机化任务,在该任务中,他们接受了一系列 30 次试验,在这些试验中,他们可以选择进行 20 次按钮按压以获得 1 美元,或者进行 100 次按钮按压以获得更高的金额(每次试验从 3 美元到 7 美元不等)。还操纵了奖励获得的可能性,以确定确定(100%)或不确定(50%)奖励是否会影响基于努力的决策。
与对照受试者相比,患者在 100%概率条件下不太可能选择高努力反应选择,尤其是在奖励最高时(即 6 美元和 7 美元)。在 50%概率条件下,在获得奖励后的试验中,患者也不太可能选择高努力选项。此外,在负面症状升高的患者中,努力成本计算的这些缺陷最大。与氟哌啶醇当量剂量无关。
SZ 的动机障碍可能与估计费力行为的“成本”的异常有关。这种增加的努力成本可能会破坏意志。