Suppr超能文献

在电子健康记录中书写和阅读:一个全新的世界。

Writing and reading in the electronic health record: an entirely new world.

机构信息

Department of Medical Education, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, IL, USA.

出版信息

Med Educ Online. 2013 Feb 5;18:1-7. doi: 10.3402/meo.v18i0.18634.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Electronic health records (EHRs) are structured, distributed documentation systems that differ from paper charts. These systems require skills not traditionally used to navigate a paper chart and to produce a written clinic note. Despite these differences, little attention has been given to physicians' electronic health record (EHR)-writing and -reading competence.

PURPOSES

This study aims to investigate physicians' self-assessed competence to document and to read EHR notes; writing and reading preferences in an EHR; and demographic characteristics associated with their perceived EHR ability and preference.

METHODS

Fourteen 5-point Likert scale items, based on EHR system characteristics and a literature review, were developed to measure EHR-writing and -reading competence and preference. Physicians in the midwest region of the United States were invited via e-mail to complete the survey online from February to April 2011. Factor analysis and reliability testing were conducted to provide validity and reliability of the instrument. Correlation and regression analysis were conducted to pursue answers to the research questions.

RESULTS

Ninety-one physicians (12.5%), from general and specialty fields, working in inpatient and outpatient settings, participated in the survey. Despite over 3 years of EHR experience, respondents perceived themselves to be incompetent in EHR writing and reading (Mean = 2.74, SD = 0.76). They preferred to read succinct, narrative notes in EHR systems. However, physicians with higher perceived EHR-writing and -reading competence had less preference toward reading succinct (r= - 0.33, p<0.001) and narrative (r= - 0.36, p<0.001) EHR notes than physicians with lower perceived EHR competence. Physicians' perceived EHR-writing and -reading competence was strongly related to their EHR navigation skills (r=0.55, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Writing and reading EHR documentation is different for physicians. Maximizing navigation skills can optimize non-linear EHR writing and reading. Pedagogical questions remain related to how physicians and medical students are able to retrieve correct information effectively and to understand thought patterns in collectively lengthier and sometimes fragmented EHR chart notes.

摘要

背景

电子健康记录 (EHR) 是一种结构化的、分布式的文档系统,与纸质图表有所不同。这些系统需要使用传统方法无法实现的技能来浏览纸质图表并生成书面临床记录。尽管存在这些差异,但人们对医生在电子健康记录 (EHR) 方面的写作和阅读能力关注甚少。

目的

本研究旨在调查医生对记录和阅读电子健康记录 (EHR) 记录的自我评估能力;他们在 EHR 中的写作和阅读偏好;以及与他们感知的 EHR 能力和偏好相关的人口统计学特征。

方法

根据 EHR 系统特征和文献回顾,开发了 14 个 5 分李克特量表项目,用于衡量 EHR 写作和阅读能力和偏好。美国中西部地区的医生通过电子邮件受邀在 2011 年 2 月至 4 月期间在线完成调查。进行了因素分析和可靠性测试,以提供工具的有效性和可靠性。进行了相关性和回归分析,以回答研究问题。

结果

来自普通和专业领域、在住院和门诊环境中工作的 91 名医生参与了这项调查。尽管他们有超过 3 年的 EHR 经验,但受访者认为自己在 EHR 写作和阅读方面能力不足(均值 = 2.74,标准差 = 0.76)。他们更喜欢在 EHR 系统中阅读简洁的叙述性记录。然而,感知 EHR 写作和阅读能力较高的医生对阅读简洁(r= - 0.33,p<0.001)和叙述性(r= - 0.36,p<0.001)EHR 记录的偏好低于感知 EHR 能力较低的医生。医生感知的 EHR 写作和阅读能力与他们的 EHR 导航技能密切相关(r=0.55,p<0.0001)。

结论

医生在编写和阅读 EHR 文档方面存在差异。最大限度地提高导航技能可以优化非线性 EHR 写作和阅读。仍然存在一些教学问题,涉及医生和医学生如何能够有效地检索正确的信息,以及如何理解在更长、有时更分散的 EHR 图表记录中集体的思维模式。

相似文献

1
Writing and reading in the electronic health record: an entirely new world.
Med Educ Online. 2013 Feb 5;18:1-7. doi: 10.3402/meo.v18i0.18634.
2
A comparative observational study of inpatient clinical note-entry and reading/retrieval styles adopted by physicians.
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Jun;90:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.02.011. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
4
Promoting Responsible Electronic Documentation: Validity Evidence for a Checklist to Assess Progress Notes in the Electronic Health Record.
Teach Learn Med. 2017 Oct-Dec;29(4):420-432. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1303385. Epub 2017 May 12.
6
The Influence of Electronic Health Record Use on Physician Burnout: Cross-Sectional Survey.
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 15;22(7):e19274. doi: 10.2196/19274.
9
Satisfaction and perceived usefulness with newly-implemented Electronic Health Records System among pediatricians at a university hospital.
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019 Feb;169:51-57. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.12.026. Epub 2018 Dec 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhanced neurologic concept recognition using a named entity recognition model based on transformers.
Front Digit Health. 2022 Dec 8;4:1065581. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.1065581. eCollection 2022.
3
4
Challenges and Opportunities to Improve the Clinician Experience Reviewing Electronic Progress Notes.
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 May;10(3):446-453. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1692164. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
6
Words prediction based on N-gram model for free-text entry in electronic health records.
Health Inf Sci Syst. 2019 Feb 28;7(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s13755-019-0065-5. eCollection 2019 Dec.
7
Usability Evaluation of an Unstructured Clinical Document Query Tool for Researchers.
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2018 May 18;2017:84-93. eCollection 2018.
9
Usability Testing of Two Ambulatory EHR Navigators.
Appl Clin Inform. 2016 Jun 15;7(2):502-15. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2015-10-RA-0129. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

5
Organizational complements to electronic health records in ambulatory physician performance: the role of support staff.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jul-Aug;19(4):537-40. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000759. Epub 2012 Apr 19.
6
The effects of electronic health record implementation on medical student educators.
Teach Learn Med. 2012;24(2):106-10. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2012.664513.
7
Clinician characteristics and use of novel electronic health record functionality in primary care.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Dec;18 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i87-90. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000330. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
9
A case study of user assessment of a corrections electronic health record.
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2011 Apr 1;8(Spring):1b.
10
Why workflow redesign alone is not enough for EHR success.
Healthc Financ Manage. 2011 Mar;65(3):130, 132.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验