Catalano O, Sandomenico F, Nunziata A, Vallone P, Raso M Mattace, Setola S V, D'Errico A Gallipoli
Radiodiagnostic Operative Unit, The G. Pascal Foundation National Tumor Institute, Naples, Italy.
J Ultrasound. 2011 Jun;14(2):66-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jus.2011.04.005. Epub 2011 May 6.
Contrast-enhanced sonography (CEUS) has become a routine part of diagnostic imaging of the liver. Its possibilities, limitations, and indications have been defined in adequately large clinical series and in guidelines and recommendations. We prospectively evaluated physicians' orders for hepatic CEUS received in the radiology department of a large oncology center in Naples, Italy from May 2009 to April 2010. Radiologists performing the CEUS examinations filled out a form that included patient demography, source and type of patient referral, and clinical indications for the examination. During the study period, 564 patients aged 17-86 years (mean, 58 years) were referred to our department for CEUS liver studies (total: 644; 491 outpatient studies, 153 inpatient studies). This included 4 examinations that were ordered by the patient's physician but not performed by our staff. The majority of the CEUS examinations (n = 583; 90.5%) were regularly scheduled procedures ordered by clinical specialists from our center (77.3%) or other centers (11.8%); by general practitioners (on their own initiative) (0.8%); or by other figures (0.6%). The remaining 61 examinations (9.5%) were unscheduled procedures done on the initiative of a radiologist following conventional sonography (US). Fewer than half (47.8%) of the examinations were requested as first-line assessments. The others were ordered to clarify inconclusive findings generated by conventional US (30%) or by a more sophisticated imaging study (CT, MRI, PET) (16.1%) or to resolve discrepancies between CT, MRI, and/or PET findings (6%). CEUS is a relatively noninvasive, low-cost imaging study that is simple to perform and requires no particular patient preparation. This may explain its increasing use to clarify doubts raised by conventional US and other more sophisticated imaging studies.
超声造影(CEUS)已成为肝脏诊断成像的常规组成部分。其可能性、局限性和适应症已在足够大的临床系列以及指南和建议中得到明确。我们前瞻性地评估了2009年5月至2010年4月在意大利那不勒斯一家大型肿瘤中心放射科收到的肝脏CEUS检查医嘱。进行CEUS检查的放射科医生填写了一份表格,其中包括患者人口统计学信息、患者转诊来源和类型以及检查临床适应症。在研究期间,564名年龄在17 - 86岁(平均58岁)的患者被转诊至我科进行肝脏CEUS检查(总计644例;491例门诊检查,153例住院检查)。其中包括4例由患者医生开出但未由我们工作人员进行的检查。大多数CEUS检查(n = 583;90.5%)是由我们中心(77.3%)或其他中心(11.8%)的临床专家定期安排的程序;由全科医生(主动)开出(0.8%);或由其他人员开出(0.6%)。其余61例检查(9.5%)是放射科医生在常规超声(US)检查后主动进行的非计划程序。不到一半(47.8%)的检查被要求作为一线评估。其他检查则是为了明确常规US产生的不确定结果(30%)或更复杂的成像研究(CT、MRI、PET)产生的结果(16.1%),或解决CT、MRI和/或PET结果之间的差异(6%)。CEUS是一种相对无创、低成本的成像研究,操作简单,无需特殊患者准备。这可能解释了其越来越多地用于澄清常规US和其他更复杂成像研究引发的疑问。