Schwarze V, Mueller-Peltzer K, Negrão de Figueiredo G, Lindner F, Rübenthaler J, Clevert D-A
Department of Radiology, Interdisciplinary Ultrasound Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich - Grosshadern Campus, Munich, Germany.
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2018;70(4):449-455. doi: 10.3233/CH-189310.
Hepatic echinococcosis (HE) is a zoonosis and depicts a rare but potentially lethal disease caused by larval infestation of E. multilocularis (alveolar echinococcosis, AE) and E. granulosus (cystic echinocococcosis, CE). In many countries, HE is a critical public health problem. Clinically, HE patients initially are often asymptomatic for years. Depending on the echinococcal manifestations patients can later develop unspecific symptoms as fatigue, abdominal pain and may present with elevated transaminases, jaundice and hepatomegaly. The combination of grey scale ultrasound and serological tests has been the gold standard for the screening and diagnosis of HE. Besides MRI, CT and FDG-PET scans, safe and directly accessible contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) may easily help to indirectly describe perilesional inflammation. Upon diagnosis of HE, an appropriate therapeutical strategy should be evaluated in a multidisciplinary way.
The aim of the present retrospective monocenter study is to assess the diagnostic performance of CEUS examination in the evaluation of hepatic echinococcal manifestation by comparison with CT, MRI, FDG-PET scans and histopathology.
Out of 36 patients with echinococcal disease (16 patients with E. multilocularis infection, 12 patients with E. granulosus infection and 8 patient with unspecified Echinococcus infection) 8 HE patients (4 patients with E. multilocularis, 2 patients with E. granulosus and 2 patients with unspecified echinococcal liver disease) were included in this study on whom CEUS was performed between 2008-2016. The applied contrast agent was a second-generation blood pool agent (SonoVue ®, Bracco, Milan, Italy). CEUS examinations were performed and interpreted by a single experienced radiologist with more than 15 years of experience.
All patients were examined without occurrence of any side effects. In all 4 AE patients, contrast enhancement could be detected by means of CEUS and was confirmed by MRI or PET-CT scan. In the remaining 4 patients (CE and unspecified echinococcosis), doppler ultrasonography, CEUS and corresponding CT or MRI scans could not detect any hypervascularization of the lesions of interest. The histopathological analysis did not reveal any viable parasite material. CEUS showed a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 100% compared to MRI, CT or FDG-PET-CT.
CEUS depicts a safe method for the evaluation of echinococcal liver disease. In addition to serological tests and grey scale ultrasound, CEUS imaging could be integrated as an easily accessible tool helping to describe hypervascularization as a sonomorphological correlate for active perilesional inflammation of echinococcal manifestations. CEUS may further help to differentiate between CE and AE and also to evaluate treatment outcome.
肝包虫病(HE)是一种人畜共患病,是由多房棘球绦虫幼虫感染(泡型包虫病,AE)和细粒棘球绦虫感染(囊型包虫病,CE)引起的一种罕见但可能致命的疾病。在许多国家,肝包虫病是一个严重的公共卫生问题。临床上,肝包虫病患者最初往往多年无症状。根据包虫病的表现,患者随后可能出现疲劳、腹痛等非特异性症状,并可能出现转氨酶升高、黄疸和肝肿大。灰阶超声和血清学检查相结合一直是肝包虫病筛查和诊断的金标准。除了MRI、CT和FDG-PET扫描外,安全且可直接进行的对比增强超声(CEUS)可轻松帮助间接描述病灶周围炎症。一旦诊断为肝包虫病,应通过多学科方法评估合适的治疗策略。
本项回顾性单中心研究的目的是通过与CT、MRI、FDG-PET扫描和组织病理学比较,评估CEUS检查在评估肝包虫病表现中的诊断性能。
在36例包虫病患者(16例多房棘球绦虫感染患者、12例细粒棘球绦虫感染患者和8例未明确包虫感染患者)中,8例肝包虫病患者(4例多房棘球绦虫感染患者、2例细粒棘球绦虫感染患者和2例未明确的肝包虫病患者)纳入本研究,于2008年至2016年间对其进行了CEUS检查。使用的造影剂是第二代血池造影剂(声诺维®,意大利米兰百胜公司)。CEUS检查由一位经验丰富的、有超过15年经验的放射科医生进行并解读。
所有患者均接受了检查,未发生任何副作用。在所有4例泡型包虫病患者中,通过CEUS可检测到对比增强,并经MRI或PET-CT扫描证实。在其余4例患者(囊型包虫病和未明确的包虫病)中,多普勒超声、CEUS及相应的CT或MRI扫描均未检测到感兴趣病灶的任何血管增多。组织病理学分析未发现任何活的寄生虫物质。与MRI、CT或FDG-PET-CT相比,CEUS的敏感性和特异性均为100%。
CEUS是评估肝包虫病的一种安全方法。除血清学检查和灰阶超声外,CEUS成像可作为一种易于获得的工具纳入其中,有助于将血管增多描述为包虫病表现中病灶周围活动性炎症的一种超声形态学相关表现。CEUS可能进一步有助于鉴别囊型包虫病和泡型包虫病,并评估治疗效果。