McGuffin P, Huckle P
Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, South Wales, United Kingdom.
Am J Hum Genet. 1990 May;46(5):994-9.
Much of the recent confusion concerning studies of complex phenotypes such as neuropsychiatric disorders may derive from the inappropriate assumption of simple Mendelian transmission. This has sometimes led to unrealistic expectations regarding the potential benefits of linkage studies. To investigate how Mendelism may be simulated, we collected data on a common familial behavioral trait, attendance at medical school, among the relatives of 249 preclinical medical students. The "risk" of first-degree relatives going to medical school was approximately 61 times that of the general population. Complex segregation analysis carried out under a unified model provided strong evidence of vertical transmission. The results were compatible with transmission of a major effect, and a recessive model provided as satisfactory a fit as a general single-locus model. Moreover, a commonly applied test, allowing the transmission probability parameter (tau 2) to deviate from its Mendelian value, did not give a significant improvement of fit. Only a more general model where all three transmission probabilities (tau 1, tau 2, and tau 3) were unrestricted resulted in a significantly better fit than did the recessive model.
近期,许多关于神经精神疾病等复杂表型研究的困惑可能源于对简单孟德尔遗传传递的不恰当假设。这有时导致了对连锁研究潜在益处的不切实际期望。为了研究如何模拟孟德尔遗传,我们收集了249名临床前医学生亲属中一个常见的家族行为特征——上医学院的数据。一级亲属上医学院的“风险”约为普通人群的61倍。在统一模型下进行的复杂分离分析提供了垂直传递的有力证据。结果与主要效应的传递相符,隐性模型与一般单基因座模型的拟合度相当。此外,一项常用测试允许传递概率参数(tau 2)偏离其孟德尔值,但并未显著改善拟合度。只有一个更通用的模型,其中所有三个传递概率(tau 1、tau 2和tau 3)不受限制,其拟合度才比隐性模型有显著改善。