Schork N J, Boehnke M, Terwilliger J D, Ott J
Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-0500.
Am J Hum Genet. 1993 Nov;53(5):1127-36.
Recent advances in molecular biology have provided geneticists with ever-increasing numbers of highly polymorphic genetic markers that have made possible linkage mapping of loci responsible for many human diseases. However, nearly all diseases mapped to date follow clear Mendelian, single-locus segregation patterns. In contrast, many common familial diseases such as diabetes, psoriasis, several forms of cancer, and schizophrenia are familial and appear to have a genetic component but do not exhibit simple Mendelian transmission. More complex models are required to explain the genetics of these important diseases. In this paper, we explore two-trait-locus, two-marker-locus linkage analysis in which two trait loci are mapped simultaneously to separate genetic markers. We compare the utility of this approach to standard one-trait-locus, one-marker-locus linkage analysis with and without allowance for heterogeneity. We also compare the utility of the two-trait-locus, two-marker-locus analysis to two-trait-locus, one-marker-locus linkage analysis. For common diseases, pedigrees are often bilineal, with disease genes entering via two or more unrelated pedigree members. Since such pedigrees often are avoided in linkage studies, we also investigate the relative information content of unilineal and bilineal pedigrees. For the dominant-or-recessive and threshold models that we consider, we find that two-trait-locus, two-marker-locus linkage analysis can provide substantially more linkage information, as measured by expected maximum lod score, than standard one-trait-locus, one-marker-locus methods, even allowing for heterogeneity, while, for a dominant-or-dominant generating model, one-locus models that allow for heterogeneity extract essentially as much information as the two-trait-locus methods. For these three models, we also find that bilineal pedigrees provide sufficient linkage information to warrant their inclusion in such studies. We also discuss strategies for assessing the significance of the two linkages assumed in two-trait-locus, two-marker-locus models.
分子生物学的最新进展为遗传学家提供了越来越多高度多态的遗传标记,这使得对许多人类疾病相关基因座进行连锁图谱绘制成为可能。然而,迄今为止几乎所有已绘制图谱的疾病都遵循明确的孟德尔单基因座分离模式。相比之下,许多常见的家族性疾病,如糖尿病、牛皮癣、几种癌症和精神分裂症,具有家族聚集性且似乎有遗传因素,但并不表现出简单的孟德尔遗传传递方式。需要更复杂的模型来解释这些重要疾病的遗传学。在本文中,我们探讨双性状基因座、双标记基因座连锁分析,其中两个性状基因座同时定位到不同的遗传标记上。我们比较了这种方法与标准的单性状基因座、单标记基因座连锁分析(考虑和不考虑遗传异质性)的效用。我们还比较了双性状基因座、双标记基因座分析与双性状基因座、单标记基因座连锁分析的效用。对于常见疾病,家系通常是双边的,致病基因通过两个或更多不相关的家系成员传入。由于在连锁研究中通常避免使用此类家系,我们还研究了单边家和双边家系的相对信息含量。对于我们所考虑的显性或隐性以及阈值模型,我们发现,以预期最大对数似然比得分衡量,双性状基因座、双标记基因座连锁分析比标准的单性状基因座、单标记基因座方法能提供更多的连锁信息,即使考虑遗传异质性也是如此;而对于显性或显性遗传模型,考虑遗传异质性的单基因座模型提取的信息与双性状基因座方法基本相同。对于这三种模型,我们还发现双边家系提供了足够的连锁信息,值得纳入此类研究。我们还讨论了评估双性状基因座、双标记基因座模型中假设的两个连锁关系显著性的策略。