Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands,
J Autism Dev Disord. 2013 Oct;43(10):2280-94. doi: 10.1007/s10803-013-1783-1.
The algorithm of the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised provides criteria for autism versus non-autism according to DSM-IV. Criteria for the broader autism spectrum disorders are needed. This study investigated the validity of seven sets of criteria from the literature, in 1,204 Dutch children (aged 3-18 years) with and without mental retardation. The original criteria (Rutter et al. in ADI-R Autism Diagnostic Interview Revised. Manual. Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles, 2003) well discriminated ASD from non-ASD in MR. All other criteria (IMGSAC in Am Soc Hum Genet 69:570-581 2001; Sung et al. in Am J Hum Genet 76: 68-81, 2005; Risi et al. in J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 45: 1094-1103, 2006) were sensitive at the cost of specificity, bearing the risk of overinclusiveness. In the group without MR, clinicians should decide whether sensitivity or specificity is aimed for, to choose the appropriate criteria. Including the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule revised algorithms in the classification, the specificity increases, at the cost of sensitivity. This study adds to a more valid judgment on which criteria to use for specific objectives.
自闭症诊断访谈修订版的算法根据 DSM-IV 为自闭症与非自闭症提供了标准。需要更广泛的自闭症谱系障碍标准。本研究在 1204 名荷兰儿童(年龄 3-18 岁,有或没有智力障碍)中调查了文献中七组标准的有效性。原始标准(Rutter 等人,在 ADI-R 自闭症诊断访谈修订版。手册。西方心理服务,洛杉矶,2003 年)很好地区分了 MR 中的 ASD 和非 ASD。所有其他标准(IMGSAC 在 Am Soc Hum Genet 69:570-581 2001 年;Sung 等人,在 Am J Hum Genet 76:68-81,2005 年;Risi 等人,在 J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 45:1094-1103,2006 年)在特异性的代价下具有敏感性,存在过度包容性的风险。在没有 MR 的组中,临床医生应决定是针对敏感性还是特异性,以选择适当的标准。将自闭症诊断观察量表修订算法纳入分类,特异性增加,敏感性降低。这项研究为针对特定目标使用哪些标准提供了更有效的判断。