Suppr超能文献

全膝关节置换术后的疼痛是关节周围注射效果好还是鞘内注射吗啡效果好?

Is pain after TKA better with periarticular injection or intrathecal morphine?

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thammasat University, 99 Moo 18, Khlong Nueng, Khlong Luang, Pathumthani, 12120, Thailand.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jun;471(6):1992-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2826-9. Epub 2013 Feb 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain after TKA is a major concern to patients. The best technique to control pain is still controversial. Intrathecal morphine or periarticular multimodal drug injection are both commonly used and both appear to provide better pain control than placebo, but it is unclear whether one or the other provides better pain control.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked whether intrathecal morphine or periarticular multimodal drug injection provides better pain control with fewer adverse events.

METHODS

In a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial we randomized 57 patients with osteoarthritic knees who underwent TKAs into two groups. Group M (n = 28) received 0.2 mg intrathecal morphine while Group I (n = 29) received periarticular multimodal drug injection. Postoperative pain was managed with patient-controlled analgesia using ketorolac. The outcomes were pain levels, the amount of analgesic drug used, and drug-related side effects. Patients and evaluators were blinded. All patients were followed up to 3 months.

RESULTS

We found no difference in postoperative pain level, analgesia drug consumption, blood loss in drain, and knee function. More patients in Group M required antiemetic (19 [69%] versus 10 [34%]) and antipruritic drugs (10 [36%] versus three [10%]) than patients in Group I.

CONCLUSIONS

The two techniques provide no different pain control capacity. The periarticular multimodal drug injection was associated with lower rates of vomiting and pruritus.

摘要

背景

TKA 术后疼痛是患者关注的主要问题。控制疼痛的最佳技术仍存在争议。鞘内吗啡或关节周围多模式药物注射都是常用的方法,两者似乎都比安慰剂提供更好的疼痛控制,但尚不清楚哪一种方法提供更好的疼痛控制。

问题/目的:我们想知道鞘内吗啡或关节周围多模式药物注射在减少不良事件的情况下,哪一种能提供更好的疼痛控制。

方法

在一项前瞻性、双盲、随机对照试验中,我们将 57 例接受 TKA 的骨关节炎膝关节患者随机分为两组。M 组(n = 28)接受 0.2mg 鞘内吗啡,I 组(n = 29)接受关节周围多模式药物注射。术后疼痛采用患者自控镇痛(PCIA)用酮咯酸进行管理。观察指标为疼痛程度、镇痛药用量和药物相关副作用。患者和评估者均为盲法。所有患者均随访 3 个月。

结果

我们发现两组患者术后疼痛程度、镇痛药物用量、引流中失血量和膝关节功能无差异。M 组比 I 组需要更多的止吐药(19 [69%] vs. 10 [34%])和止痒药(10 [36%] vs. 3 [10%])。

结论

两种技术提供的疼痛控制能力没有差异。关节周围多模式药物注射与较低的呕吐和瘙痒发生率相关。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验