Suppr超能文献

红色吸引力效应,应用 Ioannidis 和 Trikalinos(2007b)检验,以及更广泛的科学背景:对 Francis(2013)的回复。

The red-attractiveness effect, applying the Ioannidis and Trikalinos (2007b) test, and the broader scientific context: a reply to Francis (2013).

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Social Psychology.

Department of Psychology, University of Munich.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Feb;142(1):297-300. doi: 10.1037/a0029592.

Abstract

Francis (2013) tested for and found evidence of publication bias in 1 of the 3 focal relations examined in Elliot et al. (2010), that between red and attractiveness. He then called into question the research as a whole and the field of experimental psychology more generally. Our reply has 3 foci. First, we attend to the bottom line regarding the red-attractiveness effect; it has already been replicated and extended by several independent laboratories. Second, we note that the test applied to our research is an exploratory test meant to be used cautiously and highlight ways in which the application to our research seems incautious. Third, we place the critique in the broader context of the prevailing norms and practices of the field and suggest that the preferred approach to reevaluating and revising the system currently in place is the frank, creative exchange of ideas already underway.

摘要

弗朗西斯(2013 年)在埃利奥特等人(2010 年)所研究的 3 个焦点关系中,对其中一个关系(即红色与吸引力之间的关系)进行了测试并发现了发表偏差的证据。随后,他对整个研究以及更广泛的实验心理学领域提出了质疑。我们的回复有 3 个重点。首先,我们关注红色吸引力效应的底线;它已经被几个独立的实验室复制和扩展。其次,我们注意到应用于我们研究的测试是一种探索性测试,应该谨慎使用,并突出应用于我们研究的方式似乎不够谨慎。第三,我们将批评置于该领域当前流行的规范和实践的更广泛背景下,并建议重新评估和修改当前系统的首选方法是已经在进行的坦诚、创造性的思想交流。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验