Suppr超能文献

最大多普勒速度法估算壁切应力的误差。

Errors in the estimation of wall shear stress by maximum Doppler velocity.

机构信息

Biomedical Simulation Laboratory, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, 5 King's College Rd, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G8, Canada.

出版信息

Atherosclerosis. 2013 Apr;227(2):259-66. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.01.026. Epub 2013 Jan 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Wall shear stress (WSS) is an important parameter with links to vascular (dys)function. Difficult to measure directly, WSS is often inferred from maximum spectral Doppler velocity (Vmax) by assuming fully-developed flow, which is valid only if the vessel is long and straight. Motivated by evidence that even slight/local curvatures in the nominally straight common carotid artery (CCA) prevent flow from fully developing, we investigated the effects of velocity profile skewing on Vmax-derived WSS.

METHODS

Velocity profiles, representing different degrees of skewing, were extracted from the CCA of image-based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations carried out as part of the VALIDATE study. Maximum velocities were calculated from idealised sample volumes and used to estimate WSS via fully-developed (Poiseuille or Womersley) velocity profiles, for comparison with the actual (i.e. CFD-derived) WSS.

RESULTS

For cycle-averaged WSS, mild velocity profile skewing caused ±25% errors by assuming Poiseuille or Womersley profiles, while severe skewing caused a median error of 30% (maximum 55%). Peak systolic WSS was underestimated by ~50% irrespective of skewing with Poiseuille; using a Womersley profile removed this bias, but ±30% errors remained. Errors were greatest in late systole, when skewing was most pronounced. Skewing also introduced large circumferential WSS variations: ±60%, and up to ±100%, of the circumferentially averaged value.

CONCLUSION

Vmax-derived WSS may be prone to substantial variable errors related to velocity profile skewing, and cannot detect possibly large circumferential WSS variations. Caution should be exercised when making assumptions about velocity profile shape to calculate WSS, even in vessels usually considered long and straight.

摘要

目的

壁面切应力(WSS)是与血管(功能)障碍相关的一个重要参数。由于难以直接测量,WSS 通常通过假设完全发展的流动从最大光谱多普勒速度(Vmax)推断得出,只有在血管长且直的情况下才有效。由于即使在名义上直的颈总动脉(CCA)中出现轻微/局部的曲率也会阻止流动完全发展的证据,我们研究了速度剖面偏斜对 Vmax 衍生 WSS 的影响。

方法

速度剖面,代表不同程度的偏斜,从基于图像的计算流体动力学(CFD)模拟的 CCA 中提取,这些模拟是 VALIDATE 研究的一部分。从理想样本体积中计算出最大速度,并使用完全发展(泊肃叶或沃默斯利)速度剖面来估计 WSS,与实际(即 CFD 衍生)WSS 进行比较。

结果

对于平均周期 WSS,假设泊肃叶或沃默斯利剖面会导致轻度速度剖面偏斜造成±25%的误差,而严重偏斜会导致中位数误差为 30%(最大误差为 55%)。使用泊肃叶剖面时,无论偏斜如何,峰值收缩期 WSS 都会低估约 50%;使用沃默斯利剖面可以消除这种偏差,但仍会存在±30%的误差。偏斜最明显时,在收缩末期误差最大。偏斜还会引入大的周向 WSS 变化:最大可达周向平均 WSS 的±100%。

结论

Vmax 衍生的 WSS 可能容易受到与速度剖面偏斜相关的大量可变误差的影响,并且无法检测到可能较大的周向 WSS 变化。在计算 WSS 时,即使在通常被认为长而直的血管中,对速度剖面形状做出假设也应谨慎。

相似文献

1
Errors in the estimation of wall shear stress by maximum Doppler velocity.最大多普勒速度法估算壁切应力的误差。
Atherosclerosis. 2013 Apr;227(2):259-66. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.01.026. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
8
Is flow in the common carotid artery fully developed?颈总动脉中的血流是否已充分发展?
Physiol Meas. 2008 Nov;29(11):1335-49. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/29/11/008. Epub 2008 Oct 14.

引用本文的文献

3
Hemodynamics in Doppler ultrasonography.多普勒超声检查中的血流动力学
Ultrasonography. 2024 Nov;43(6):413-423. doi: 10.14366/usg.24126. Epub 2024 Sep 19.

本文引用的文献

10
Is flow in the common carotid artery fully developed?颈总动脉中的血流是否已充分发展?
Physiol Meas. 2008 Nov;29(11):1335-49. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/29/11/008. Epub 2008 Oct 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验