Center of Biostatistics for Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900, Monza, Italy.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Feb 11;13:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-16.
In the absence of randomization, the comparison of an experimental treatment with respect to the standard may be done based on a matched design. When there is a limited set of cases receiving the experimental treatment, matching of a proper set of controls in a non fixed proportion is convenient.
In order to deal with the highly stratified survival data generated by multiple matching, we extend the multivariate permutation testing approach, since standard nonparametric methods for the comparison of survival curves cannot be applied in this setting.
We demonstrate the validity of the proposed method with simulations, and we illustrate its application to data from an observational study for the comparison of bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in the treatment of paediatric leukaemia.
The use of the multivariate permutation testing approach is recommended in the highly stratified context of survival matched data, especially when the proportional hazards assumption does not hold.
在缺乏随机化的情况下,可以基于匹配设计来比较实验治疗与标准治疗。当实验组的病例数量有限时,方便采用非固定比例的适当对照组进行匹配。
为了处理由多次匹配产生的高度分层生存数据,我们扩展了多元置换检验方法,因为标准的非参数生存曲线比较方法在此情况下无法应用。
我们通过模拟验证了所提出方法的有效性,并展示了其在骨髓移植和化疗治疗儿科白血病的观察性研究数据中的应用。
在高度分层的生存匹配数据背景下,特别是当比例风险假设不成立时,推荐使用多元置换检验方法。