Department of Economics and Statistics, University of Naples Federico II, 80126, Naples, Italy.
Department of Economics, Unit of Statistical and Mathematical Sciences, University of Messina, 98100, Messina, Italy.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Jul 20;18(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0540-8.
Statistical methodology is a powerful tool in the health research; however, there is wide accord that statistical methodologies are not usually used properly. In particular when multiple comparisons are needed, it is necessary to check the rate of false positive results and the potential inflation of type I errors. In this case, permutation testing methods are useful to check the simultaneous significance level and identify the most significant factors.
In this paper an application of permutation tests, in the medical context of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, is performed. The main goal is to assess the existence of significant differences between Crohn's Disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC). The Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test (Bonferroni-Holm procedure) is used to find which of the partial tests are effectively significant and solve the problem of the multiplicity control.
Applying Non-Parametric Combination (NPC) Test for partial and combined tests we conclude that Crohn's Disease patients and Ulcerative Colitis patients differ between them for most examined variables. UC patients compared with the CD patients, have a higher diagnosis age, not show smoking status, proportion of patients treated with immunosuppressants or with biological drugs is lower than the CD patients, even if the duration of such therapies is longer. CD patients have a higher rate of re-hospitalization. Diabetes is more present in the sub-population of UC patients. Analyzing the Charlson score we can highlight that UC patients have a more severe clinical situation than CD patients. Finally, CD patients are more frequently subject to surgery compared to UC. Appling of the Bonferroni Holm procedure, which provided adjusted p-values, we note that only nine of the examined variables are statistically significant: Smoking habit, Immunosuppressive therapy, Surgery, Biological Drug, Diabetes, Adverse Events, Re-hospitalization, Gender and Duration of Immunosoppressive Therapy. Therefore, we can conclude that these are the specific variables that can discriminate effectively the Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis groups.
We identified significant variables that discriminate the two groups, satisfying the multiplicity problem, in fact we can affirm that Smoking habit, Immunosuppressive therapy, Surgery, Biological Drug, Diabetes, Adverse Events, Hospitalization, Gender and Duration of Immunosoppressive Therapy are the effectively significant variables.
统计方法是健康研究中强有力的工具;然而,人们广泛认为统计方法通常没有得到正确使用。特别是在需要进行多次比较时,有必要检查假阳性结果的比率和 I 型错误的潜在膨胀。在这种情况下,置换检验方法可用于检查同时的显著性水平并识别最重要的因素。
本文在炎症性肠病的医学背景下进行了置换检验的应用。主要目标是评估克罗恩病 (CD) 和溃疡性结肠炎 (UC) 之间是否存在显著差异。使用连续拒绝多重检验 (Bonferroni-Holm 程序) 找到哪些部分检验实际上是显著的,并解决多重控制的问题。
应用非参数组合 (NPC) 检验部分和联合检验,我们得出结论,大多数检查变量中,克罗恩病患者和溃疡性结肠炎患者之间存在差异。与 CD 患者相比,UC 患者的诊断年龄较高,不显示吸烟状况,接受免疫抑制剂或生物药物治疗的患者比例较低,尽管此类治疗的持续时间较长。CD 患者的再住院率更高。糖尿病在 UC 患者的亚人群中更为常见。分析 Charlson 评分可以突出 UC 患者的临床情况比 CD 患者更为严重。最后,CD 患者比 UC 患者更频繁地接受手术。应用 Bonferroni-Holm 程序提供了调整后的 p 值,我们注意到只有九个检查变量具有统计学意义:吸烟习惯、免疫抑制治疗、手术、生物药物、糖尿病、不良事件、再住院、性别和免疫抑制治疗持续时间。因此,我们可以得出结论,这些是可以有效区分克罗恩病和溃疡性结肠炎组的特定变量。
我们确定了可以区分两组的显著变量,解决了多重性问题,实际上我们可以断言,吸烟习惯、免疫抑制治疗、手术、生物药物、糖尿病、不良事件、住院、性别和免疫抑制治疗持续时间是有效的显著变量。