Poucet B, Herrmann T
Laboratoire de Neurosciences Fonctionnelles, C.N.R.S., Marseille, France.
Behav Brain Res. 1990 Mar 26;37(3):269-80. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(90)90139-6.
An attempt was made to contrast the effects of lesions to the medial frontal cortex and septum in two spatial tasks. In the fixed-goal (FG) task, the food was located on the same table throughout testing, and the start table was randomly varied from day to day. In the variable-goal (VG) task, the start table remained constant but the food was randomly distributed on one or the other of the two remaining tables. In both tasks, normal animals performed better than frontal and septal rats whose performance, however, improved over days in the FG, but not in the VG, task. In both tasks, significant improvement within days was found in medial frontal animals, but not in septal animals. Additional analyses revealed that septal animals had a general pattern of disrupted exploration and a tendency to use a response strategy (i.e. to repeat the same response both within and between days) which decreased over days in the FG task. In contrast, medial frontal animals did not demonstrate disrupted exploration nor any response tendency. It is concluded that both septal and medial frontal cortical damage produce a common spatial working memory impairment. However, there is some evidence to suggest that this common memory impairment could result from disruption of distinct mechanisms in septal and frontal animals. It is proposed that medial frontal lesions could affect some specific mechanism related either to attentional processes or to the ability to anticipate future events, whereas septal damage would interfere with the building of comprehensive and flexible spatial memories.
研究试图对比内侧额叶皮质和隔区损伤在两个空间任务中的影响。在固定目标(FG)任务中,整个测试过程中食物都放在同一张桌子上,起始桌子每天随机变化。在可变目标(VG)任务中,起始桌子保持不变,但食物随机分布在剩下两张桌子中的一张上。在这两个任务中,正常动物的表现都优于额叶和隔区受损的大鼠,不过,在FG任务中,额叶和隔区受损大鼠的表现随天数增加而改善,而在VG任务中则没有。在这两个任务中,内侧额叶受损的动物在数天内有显著改善,而隔区受损的动物则没有。进一步分析表明,隔区受损的动物有探索行为紊乱的总体模式,并且有使用反应策略的倾向(即在同一天内和不同天之间重复相同反应),这种倾向在FG任务中随天数增加而减少。相比之下,内侧额叶受损的动物没有表现出探索行为紊乱或任何反应倾向。研究得出结论,隔区和内侧额叶皮质损伤都会导致共同的空间工作记忆障碍。然而,有证据表明,这种共同的记忆障碍可能是由于隔区和额叶受损动物中不同机制的破坏所致。有人提出,内侧额叶损伤可能会影响与注意力过程或预测未来事件能力相关的某些特定机制,而隔区损伤则会干扰全面且灵活的空间记忆的构建。