• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国学龄前儿童用力呼气指标的参考标准。

Reference standards for forced expiratory indices in Chinese preschool children.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Pediatr Pulmonol. 2013 Nov;48(11):1119-26. doi: 10.1002/ppul.22773. Epub 2013 Feb 8.

DOI:10.1002/ppul.22773
PMID:23401490
Abstract

Spirometric testing is traditionally achievable in children of school-age and beyond. Incorporation of interactive incentives motivates preschool children to facilitate measurement of forced expiratory indices. Validated spirometric reference standards are available for Caucasian preschoolers but lacking in Asians. We established spirometric references in Chinese children aged 2-7 years, who were recruited from 19 randomly selected nurseries and kindergartens in Hong Kong. Parents completed International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood questionnaire, and children concurrently performed incentive spirometry on-site according to international guideline. Prediction equations for spirometric indices were formulated by linear regression. One thousand four hundred two (72.9%) of 1,922 consented children, with mean (SD) age 4.4 (1.0) years, successfully performed spirometry. Following exclusions due to medical and technical reasons, 895 (63.8%) children contributed spirometric data to our references. Girls had lower FEV0.5 , FEV0.75 , FEV1 , FVC, and PEF but similar FEF25-75 than boys, adjusted for age, weight, and standing height as covariates. Standing height was the most important predictor for FEV0.5 , FEV0.75 , FEV1 , FVC, and PEF in both boys (adjusted R(2) 0.525-0.734) and girls (adjusted R(2) 0.583-0.721), whereas the best prediction model for both gender is formed by standing height, weight, and age. At various standing heights, our preschoolers had FEV1 Z-scores 0.13-1.00 higher than those of collaborative Caucasian reference. This study justifies the need for ethnic-specific reference equations and presents spirometry references in young Chinese children. Their forced expiratory indices are determined by gender, age, weight and standing height, and standing height is the best anthropometric index to predict all spirometric indices.

摘要

肺功能测试在学龄期及以上的儿童中传统上是可行的。引入互动激励措施可以激励学龄前儿童进行用力呼气指标的测量。已经有针对白种人学龄前儿童的经过验证的肺功能参考标准,但亚洲儿童的标准却缺乏。我们在香港 19 所随机挑选的幼儿园和托儿所招募了 2-7 岁的中国儿童,建立了中国儿童的肺功能参考标准。家长填写了《儿童哮喘和过敏国际研究》调查问卷,同时根据国际指南,让儿童在现场进行激励式肺功能测试。通过线性回归制定了肺功能指标的预测方程。在 1922 名同意参与的儿童中,有 1402 名(72.9%),平均(SD)年龄为 4.4(1.0)岁,成功进行了肺功能测试。由于医疗和技术原因排除后,895 名(63.8%)儿童的肺功能数据被纳入我们的参考标准。与男孩相比,女孩的 FEV0.5、FEV0.75、FEV1、FVC 和 PEF 较低,但 FEF25-75 相似,这些差异在调整年龄、体重和身高作为协变量后仍然存在。身高是男孩(调整后的 R2 0.525-0.734)和女孩(调整后的 R2 0.583-0.721)FEV0.5、FEV0.75、FEV1、FVC 和 PEF 的最重要预测因素,而对于两性而言,最佳预测模型是由身高、体重和年龄组成的。在不同的身高下,我们的学龄前儿童的 FEV1 Z 分数比合作的白种人参考值高 0.13-1.00。这项研究证明了需要制定特定种族的参考方程,并为中国的年轻儿童提供了肺功能参考。他们的用力呼气指标由性别、年龄、体重和身高决定,身高是预测所有肺功能指标的最佳人体测量指标。

相似文献

1
Reference standards for forced expiratory indices in Chinese preschool children.中国学龄前儿童用力呼气指标的参考标准。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2013 Nov;48(11):1119-26. doi: 10.1002/ppul.22773. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
2
Applicability of the Global Lung Function Initiative prediction equations in Hong Kong Chinese children.全球肺功能倡议预测方程在香港华裔儿童中的适用性。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2023 Nov;58(11):3235-3245. doi: 10.1002/ppul.26649. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
3
[Feasibility and predicted equations of spirometry in Shenzhen preschool children].[深圳学龄前儿童肺功能检查的可行性及预测方程]
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2005 Nov;43(11):843-8.
4
Spirometric pulmonary function parameters of healthy Chinese children aged 3-6 years in Taiwan.台湾3至6岁健康中国儿童的肺量计肺功能参数
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2009 Jul;44(7):676-82. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21038.
5
Validation of Global Lung Function Initiative and All Ages Reference Equations for Forced Spirometry in Healthy Spanish Preschoolers.全球肺功能倡议及适用于健康西班牙学龄前儿童用力肺活量测定的全年龄段参考方程的验证
Arch Bronconeumol (Engl Ed). 2018 Jan;54(1):24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2017.07.019. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
6
Spirometric reference values in school children from Dalmatia.达尔马提亚地区学龄儿童的肺功能参考值。
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 1995 Aug;50(4):258-63.
7
Spirometric values in healthy preschool children.健康学龄前儿童的肺功能测定值。
Rev Chil Pediatr. 2019;90(1):69-77. doi: 10.32641/rchped.v90i1.766.
8
Spirometric reference values for Hopi Native American children ages 4-13 years.4至13岁霍皮族美国原住民儿童的肺功能参考值。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016 Apr;51(4):386-93. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23341. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
9
Spirometric reference values for healthy Han children aged 5-15 years in Guangzhou, southern China.中国南方广州5至15岁健康汉族儿童的肺功能参考值
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015 Oct;50(10):1009-16. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23099. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
10
Spirometric reference standards for preschool children in Hong Kong.香港学龄前儿童肺量计参考标准。
Hong Kong Med J. 2013 Dec;19 Suppl 9:21-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of predictive equations for spirometry in Portuguese children.葡萄牙儿童肺活量测定预测方程的开发与验证
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2023 Feb 8;2(2):100084. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2023.100084. eCollection 2023 May.
2
Reference Values and Related Factors for Peak Expiratory Flow in Middle-Aged and Elderly Chinese.中年和老年中国人的最大呼气峰流速参考值及其相关因素。
Front Public Health. 2021 Aug 20;9:706524. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.706524. eCollection 2021.
3
Ambient Air Pollution and Daily Hospital Admissions for Respiratory Disease in Children in Guiyang, China.
中国贵阳的环境空气污染与儿童呼吸道疾病每日住院情况
Front Pediatr. 2019 Oct 4;7:400. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00400. eCollection 2019.
4
Peak expiratory flow among healthy children aged 5-14 years in China.中国5至14岁健康儿童的呼气峰值流速
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Mar;10(3):1377-1385. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.02.41.
5
Reference values for spirometry in Chinese aged 4-80 years.4至80岁中国人群肺活量测定的参考值。
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Nov;9(11):4538-4549. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.10.110.