Fereidouni Sasan R, Globig Anja, Starick Elke, Harder Timm C
Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Suedufer 10, D-17493 Greifswald, Insel Riems, Germany.
Avian Dis. 2012 Dec;56(4 Suppl):955-8. doi: 10.1637/10146-033012-ResNote.1.
Virologic monitoring of avian influenza viruses (AIV) mainly relies on the collection of oropharyngeal, cloacal, or fecal swab samples. The quality of swab samples, therefore, contributes to limitations of the informative value of such monitoring, but the cost of sampling has a great impact on the feasibility of wild bird monitoring studies or poultry surveillance programs. Here, the effect of different swab material and storage conditions on quality and quantity of AIV RNA detection in swab samples by real-time reverse-transcription quantitative PCR has been studied. Two commercial swab products, a rayon-tipped and a flocked nylon type, were compared. Similar suitability of the two swab types, despite a huge price difference, was observed. Superior results by using both types of swab were gained provided that 1) swabs stayed immersed overnight in an appropriate viral transport medium (VTM), or that 2) swabs were vigorously shaken in VTM for at least 1 min and up to 1 hr to release as much trapped virus material as possible. Degradation of RNA over a period of 2 wk for virus-containing samples is negligible when using constant storage conditions at 4 C or 20 C; temperature shifts proved to be more harmful.
禽流感病毒(AIV)的病毒学监测主要依赖于采集口咽、泄殖腔或粪便拭子样本。因此,拭子样本的质量会影响此类监测信息价值的局限性,但采样成本对野生鸟类监测研究或家禽监测计划的可行性有很大影响。在此,研究了不同拭子材料和储存条件对实时逆转录定量PCR检测拭子样本中AIV RNA质量和数量的影响。比较了两种商用拭子产品,一种是人造丝头拭子,另一种是植绒尼龙拭子。尽管价格差异巨大,但观察到两种拭子类型具有相似的适用性。如果满足以下条件,使用这两种拭子均可获得更好的结果:1)拭子在适当的病毒运输培养基(VTM)中浸泡过夜;或2)拭子在VTM中剧烈摇晃至少1分钟至1小时,以尽可能多地释放被困的病毒物质。对于含病毒样本,在4℃或20℃恒定储存条件下,RNA在2周内的降解可忽略不计;温度变化被证明更具危害性。