Alkhamis Mohammad, Willeberg Preben, Carlsson Ulla, Carpenter Tim, Perez Andres
Center for Animal Disease Modeling and Surveillance (CADMS), School of Veterinary Medicine, One Shields Avenue, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Avian Dis. 2012 Dec;56(4 Suppl):1040-8. doi: 10.1637/10192-041012-Reg.1.
The objective of this study was to demonstrate the effects of the nature of the information collected through passive surveillance on the detection of space-time clusters of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV) H5N1 cases reported among dead wild birds in Denmark and Sweden in 2006. Data included 1469 records (109 cases, 1360 controls) collected during the regional epidemic between February and June by passive surveillance of dead wild birds. Laboratory diagnoses were obtained by PCR methods and/or virus isolation. The nature of available information influences both the type of model suitable for analysis and its parameterization. Here, we explored four alternative scan-based methods, suitable for detection of clusters only when case data (univariate permutation model), case and hypothesized epidemiological variables (multivariate permutation model), case and control data (univariate Bernoulli model), and case, control, and hypothesized epidemiological variables (multivariate Bernoulli model) are available. Tufted ducks were particularly common among infected wild bird species detected in Denmark and Sweden during the initial phases of this epidemic, and species group (tufted ducks [62 cases, 57 controls] vs. other wild bird species [47 cases, 1303 controls]) was considered in the multivariate models as a covariate potentially associated with clustering. Bernoulli and permutation scan analyses both detected multiple significant (P < 0.01) clusters with similar locations, but with certain differences in their numbers and sizes. The observed-to-expected case ratios in the two clusters detected by the multivariate Bernoulli scan model were substantially heterogeneous. However, the permutation model detected only one of the Swedish clusters and only pinpointed the heterogeneity between species on clustering in the same Danish cluster as detected by the Bernoulli model. The output of the methods described here were shown to be highly sensitive to the choice of the probability model for cases and the choice of plausible assumptions to parameterize the scan statistic tests. The results of the multivariate Bernoulli suggest that with noncase information regarding a potential risk factor, such as species of birds, this method is sensitive and efficient in identifying high-risk areas and time periods for regional occurrence of HPAIV and potentially for similar infectious diseases. Results here demonstrate the impact that the nature of the collected information has on the epidemiological investigation of outbreaks. Results show the importance of collecting information on control data and on variables hypothesized to influence disease risk on the identification of periods of time and locations at high risk for the disease and risk factors associated with clustering as part of the national and international surveillance systems.
本研究的目的是证明通过被动监测收集的信息性质对检测2006年丹麦和瑞典死亡野生鸟类中报告的高致病性禽流感病毒(HPAIV)H5N1病例时空聚集性的影响。数据包括在2月至6月区域疫情期间通过对死亡野生鸟类的被动监测收集的1469条记录(109例病例,1360例对照)。通过PCR方法和/或病毒分离获得实验室诊断结果。可用信息的性质既影响适合分析的模型类型,也影响其参数设置。在此,我们探索了四种基于扫描的替代方法,这些方法仅在有病例数据(单变量排列模型)、病例和假设的流行病学变量(多变量排列模型)、病例和对照数据(单变量伯努利模型)以及病例、对照和假设的流行病学变量(多变量伯努利模型)时才适合检测聚集性。在本次疫情初期,在丹麦和瑞典检测到的受感染野生鸟类物种中,凤头潜鸭尤为常见,在多变量模型中,物种组(凤头潜鸭[62例病例,57例对照]与其他野生鸟类物种[47例病例,1303例对照])被视为可能与聚集性相关的协变量。伯努利扫描分析和排列扫描分析均检测到多个具有相似位置的显著(P < 0.01)聚集性,但在数量和大小上存在一定差异。多变量伯努利扫描模型检测到的两个聚集中观察到的病例与预期病例比率存在很大异质性。然而,排列模型仅检测到瑞典的一个聚集性,并且仅指出了与伯努利模型检测到的丹麦同一聚集中物种聚集性之间的异质性。此处描述的方法的输出结果显示,对病例概率模型的选择以及为扫描统计检验设置参数的合理假设的选择高度敏感。多变量伯努利模型的结果表明,有了关于潜在风险因素(如鸟类物种)的非病例信息,该方法在识别HPAIV区域发生以及可能类似传染病的高风险区域和时间段方面既敏感又有效。此处的结果证明了所收集信息的性质对疫情流行病学调查的影响。结果表明,作为国家和国际监测系统一部分,收集对照数据以及假设影响疾病风险的变量信息对于识别疾病高风险的时间段和地点以及与聚集性相关的风险因素非常重要。