Ghent University, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Department of Food Safety and Food Quality, Laboratory of Food Microbiology and Food Preservation, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Curr Opin Virol. 2013 Feb;3(1):69-73. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2012.11.003. Epub 2013 Feb 9.
Food borne viruses such as norovirus and hepatitis A virus are increasingly recognized worldwide as the most important cause of food borne gastro-intestinal illness. Food borne outbreaks, often involving multiples cases, have been reported and associated with food products of both animal and non-animal origin. Most foods are contaminated with food borne viruses during preparation and service. However, bivalve molluscs and occasionally produce (in particular leafy vegetables and soft red fruits) may be contaminated during production and processing. Owing to the low infectious dose of these viruses, the presence of few viral particles on the food is often sufficient for an infection. Over the past decade, molecular methods - such as RT-(q)PCR - have therefore been developed for rapid detection of viral contamination on foods. The availability of these detection methods has led to an increased detection of viral contamination in foods. However, RT-(q)PCR and other molecular methods detect the mere presence of an RNA (or DNA) fragment and are unable to differentiate between infectious and non-infectious viral particles in the monitoring of food products for viral contamination which makes interpretation of these results not straightforward. The current review aims to summarize recent efforts made for a more correct interpretation of these positive RT-(q)PCR results. First of all, RT-(q)PCR test results should be analyzed taking into account the results of various appropriate controls in place to assure well-functioning of good laboratory practices. Subsequently, approaches that may aid to facilitate acceptation and that may aid to put RT-(q)PCR positive food products into context from a public health perspective are discussed. These approaches include (1) the use of a critical acceptance limit, (2) the confirmation of positive RT-(q)PCR results and (3) the potential correlation with faecal indicators. Finally, the current review provides insights in a selection of methods currently under development that may be able to facilitate the specific detection of infectious food borne viruses.
食源性病毒(如诺如病毒和甲型肝炎病毒)在全球范围内越来越被认为是食源性胃肠道疾病的最重要原因。食源性暴发事件经常涉及多个病例,与动物源性和非动物源性食品有关。大多数食品在制备和供应过程中都受到食源性病毒的污染。然而,贝类软体动物偶尔会受到污染(特别是叶菜类和软果),这可能发生在生产和加工过程中。由于这些病毒的感染剂量很低,食品上少量病毒颗粒通常足以引起感染。在过去的十年中,分子方法(如 RT-(q)PCR)已被开发用于快速检测食品中的病毒污染。这些检测方法的出现导致了食品中病毒污染的检测增加。然而,RT-(q)PCR 和其他分子方法仅检测 RNA(或 DNA)片段的存在,并且在监测食品中病毒污染时,无法区分传染性和非传染性病毒颗粒,这使得对这些结果的解释并不简单。本综述旨在总结最近为更正确解释这些阳性 RT-(q)PCR 结果所做的努力。首先,应考虑适当的对照试验结果分析 RT-(q)PCR 检测结果,以确保良好的实验室操作。随后,讨论了可能有助于接受的方法,并从公共卫生角度讨论了将 RT-(q)PCR 阳性食品产品纳入考虑的方法。这些方法包括(1)使用临界接受限,(2)确认阳性 RT-(q)PCR 结果,以及(3)与粪便指标的潜在相关性。最后,本综述提供了对目前正在开发的一些方法的深入了解,这些方法可能有助于促进传染性食源性病毒的特异性检测。