• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

同伴指导改善糖尿病自我管理:哪些患者受益最大?

Peer coaching to improve diabetes self-management: which patients benefit most?

机构信息

Department of Ambulatory and Preventive Medicine, Alameda County Medical Center, 1411 East 31st St, Oakland, CA, 94602, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jul;28(7):938-42. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2367-7. Epub 2013 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-013-2367-7
PMID:23404203
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3682027/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Peer health coaching is an effective method of enhancing self-management support in patients with diabetes. It is unclear whether peer health coaching is equally beneficial to all patients with poor glycemic control, or is most effective for subgroups of patients.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether the effect of peer health coaching on hemoglobin A1c (A1c) is modified by characteristics that are known to be associated with diabetes control.

DESIGN

Sub-group analyses of randomized control trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred and ninety nine patients with diabetes receiving care in public health clinics who participated in a randomized controlled trial of peer health coaches.

MAIN MEASURES

We examined whether the association between study group and change in A1c was modified by differences in patients' demographic, behavioral or psychosocial characteristics. Analyses were adjusted for co-variables associated with change in A1c.

KEY RESULTS

The effect of coaching on patient A1c was modified by patients' level of self-management and degree of medication adherence as baseline (p=.02, and p=.03 respectively in adjusted models). For participants with "low" self-management (one standard deviation below the mean score), the usual care group experienced a slight increase in A1c (0.3 %), while the health coaching group experienced a decrease (-0.9 %). For participants with "high" self-management (one standard deviation above the mean score), both groups experienced a similar decrease in A1c (usual care group: -1.0 %; health coaching group: -1.1 %). Participants with "low" medication adherence in the usual care group experienced an increase in A1c (0.5 %), while the health coaching group experienced a decrease (-0.8 %). Participants with "high" medication adherence experienced similar decreases (usual care group: -1.1 %; health coaching group: -1.3 %).

CONCLUSION

Peer health coaching had a larger effect on lowering A1c in patients with low levels of medication adherence and self-management support than in patients with higher levels. Peer health coaching interventions may be most effective if targeted to high-risk patients with diabetes with poor glycemic control and with poor self-management and medication adherence.

摘要

背景

同伴健康教练是增强糖尿病患者自我管理支持的有效方法。目前尚不清楚同伴健康教练对血糖控制不佳的所有患者是否同样有益,还是对某些患者亚组最有效。

目的

研究同伴健康教练对血红蛋白 A1c(A1c)的影响是否受已知与糖尿病控制相关的特征的影响。

设计

随机对照试验的亚组分析。

参与者

299 名在公共卫生诊所接受治疗的糖尿病患者,他们参加了一项针对同伴健康教练的随机对照试验。

主要测量指标

我们研究了研究组与 A1c 变化之间的关联是否因患者的人口统计学、行为或心理社会特征的差异而改变。分析调整了与 A1c 变化相关的协变量。

主要结果

教练对患者 A1c 的影响受患者自我管理水平和药物依从性程度的影响(调整后的模型中,基线时分别为 p=.02 和 p=.03)。对于“低”自我管理(平均得分以下一个标准差)的参与者,常规护理组 A1c 略有增加(0.3%),而健康教练组则有所下降(-0.9%)。对于“高”自我管理(平均得分以上一个标准差)的参与者,两组 A1c 均下降(常规护理组:-1.0%;健康教练组:-1.1%)。常规护理组中“低”药物依从性的参与者 A1c 升高(0.5%),而健康教练组则下降(-0.8%)。药物依从性高的参与者 A1c 下降幅度相似(常规护理组:-1.1%;健康教练组:-1.3%)。

结论

与药物依从性和自我管理支持水平较高的患者相比,同伴健康教练对降低低水平药物依从性和自我管理支持的患者的 A1c 有更大的影响。如果针对血糖控制不佳且自我管理和药物依从性差的高危糖尿病患者实施同伴健康教练干预,可能会更有效。

相似文献

1
Peer coaching to improve diabetes self-management: which patients benefit most?同伴指导改善糖尿病自我管理:哪些患者受益最大?
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jul;28(7):938-42. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2367-7. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
2
The effectiveness of peer health coaching in improving glycemic control among low-income patients with diabetes: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.同伴健康教练在改善低收入糖尿病患者血糖控制方面的效果:一项随机对照试验方案。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Apr 1;11:208. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-208.
3
Impact of peer health coaching on glycemic control in low-income patients with diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.同伴健康教练对糖尿病低收入患者血糖控制的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Fam Med. 2013 Mar-Apr;11(2):137-44. doi: 10.1370/afm.1443.
4
Study protocol: The Technology-Enhanced Coaching (TEC) program to improve diabetes outcomes - A randomized controlled trial.研究方案:技术强化指导(TEC)项目改善糖尿病结局——一项随机对照试验。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Apr;55:24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
5
The Role and Effectiveness of Telephone Peer Coaching for Adult Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.电话同伴教练在 2 型糖尿病成年患者中的作用和效果。
Can J Diabetes. 2019 Aug;43(6):399-405. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
6
Randomized controlled trial of clinical pharmacy management of patients with type 2 diabetes in an outpatient diabetes clinic in Jordan.约旦一家门诊糖尿病诊所中2型糖尿病患者临床药学管理的随机对照试验
J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 Sep;18(7):516-26. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.7.516.
7
Effect of a Pharmacist-Led Program on Improving Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus from Northern Cyprus: A Randomized Controlled Trial.北塞浦路斯药师主导的项目对改善 2 型糖尿病患者结局的效果:一项随机对照试验。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 May;23(5):573-582. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.5.573.
8
Diabetes peer coaching: do "better patients" make better coaches?糖尿病同伴辅导:“更好的患者”能成为更好的辅导者吗?
Diabetes Educ. 2014 Jan-Feb;40(1):107-15. doi: 10.1177/0145721713513178. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
9
The impact of peer coach-led type 2 diabetes mellitus interventions on glycaemic control and self-management outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.同伴教练主导的 2 型糖尿病干预对血糖控制和自我管理结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2022 Dec;16(6):719-735. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2022.10.007. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
10
Effectiveness of Technologically Enhanced Peer Support in Improving Glycemic Management Among Predominantly African American, Low-Income Adults With Diabetes.技术增强型同伴支持在改善以非裔美国人为主体、糖尿病低收入成年人血糖管理方面的效果。
Diabetes Educ. 2019 Jun;45(3):260-271. doi: 10.1177/0145721719844547. Epub 2019 Apr 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Navigating Access to Medications for Diabetes Mellitus in the Era of 340B Drug Pricing Program Restrictions: A Bilingual Qualitative Study of Patients' Perspectives.在340B药品定价计划限制时代探索糖尿病药物获取途径:一项关于患者观点的双语定性研究
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Aug 27. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09795-x.
2
Associations of Self-Management Care and Shared Decision-Making with Glycemic Control and Psychosocial Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.2型糖尿病患者自我管理护理和共同决策与血糖控制及心理社会结局的关联
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Aug 2;19:2295-2307. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S534066. eCollection 2025.
3
Experiences of Parent Coaches in an Intervention for Parents of Young Children Newly Diagnosed with Type 1 Diabetes.家长教练对新诊断为1型糖尿病幼儿家长进行干预的经验。
Children (Basel). 2024 Aug 24;11(9):1036. doi: 10.3390/children11091036.
4
The Michigan Men's Diabetes Project Randomized Clinical Control Trial: A Pilot/Feasibility Study of a Peer-Led Diabetes Self-Management and Support Intervention for Black Men With Type 2 Diabetes.密歇根男性糖尿病项目随机临床对照试验:一项针对黑人 2 型糖尿病男性的同伴主导的糖尿病自我管理和支持干预的试点/可行性研究。
Am J Mens Health. 2024 May-Jun;18(3):15579883241258318. doi: 10.1177/15579883241258318.
5
Virtual Group Pulmonary Rehabilitation in COPD Facilitated by a Peer Coach.由同伴教练协助的慢性阻塞性肺疾病虚拟小组肺康复
Respir Care. 2023 Oct;68(10):1426-1429. doi: 10.4187/respcare.10517. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
6
What is the volume, diversity and nature of recent, robust evidence for the use of peer support in health and social care? An evidence and gap map.近期关于在健康和社会护理中使用同伴支持的有力证据的数量、多样性和性质是什么?一份证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 26;18(3):e1264. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1264. eCollection 2022 Sep.
7
Self-management of type 2 diabetes among Turkish immigrants in Norway: A focus group study.挪威土耳其移民2型糖尿病的自我管理:一项焦点小组研究。
J Public Health Res. 2023 Feb 8;12(1):22799036231154680. doi: 10.1177/22799036231154680. eCollection 2023 Jan.
8
Investigation of Barriers and Facilitators to Medication Adherence in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Across Different Health Literacy Levels: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed Methods Study.不同健康素养水平的2型糖尿病患者药物依从性的障碍与促进因素调查:一项解释性序列混合方法研究
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Oct 6;12:745749. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.745749. eCollection 2021.
9
Adults with type 2 diabetes benefit from self-management support intervention regardless of depressive symptoms.无论是否存在抑郁症状,患有 2 型糖尿病的成年人都能从自我管理支持干预中受益。
J Diabetes Complications. 2021 Nov;35(11):108024. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2021.108024. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
10
Effects of the Norfolk diabetes prevention lifestyle intervention (NDPS) on glycaemic control in screen-detected type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial.基于筛查诊断的 2 型糖尿病患者中,诺福克糖尿病预防生活方式干预(NDPS)对血糖控制的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Med. 2021 Aug 19;19(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02053-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of peer health coaching on glycemic control in low-income patients with diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.同伴健康教练对糖尿病低收入患者血糖控制的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Fam Med. 2013 Mar-Apr;11(2):137-44. doi: 10.1370/afm.1443.
2
Peer mentoring and financial incentives to improve glucose control in African American veterans: a randomized trial.同伴指导和经济激励对改善非裔美国退伍军人血糖控制的效果:一项随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Mar 20;156(6):416-24. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-6-201203200-00004.
3
National standards for diabetes self-management education.糖尿病自我管理教育国家标准。
Diabetes Care. 2012 Jan;35 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S101-8. doi: 10.2337/dc12-s101.
4
The effectiveness of peer health coaching in improving glycemic control among low-income patients with diabetes: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.同伴健康教练在改善低收入糖尿病患者血糖控制方面的效果:一项随机对照试验方案。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Apr 1;11:208. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-208.
5
Training peers to provide ongoing diabetes self-management support (DSMS): results from a pilot study.培训同行提供持续的糖尿病自我管理支持(DSMS):一项试点研究的结果。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Nov;85(2):160-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.12.013. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
6
Diabetes control with reciprocal peer support versus nurse care management: a randomized trial.采用互惠同伴支持与护士照护管理控制糖尿病:一项随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Oct 19;153(8):507-15. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-8-201010190-00007.
7
Using the Teamlet Model to improve chronic care in an academic primary care practice.利用团队模型改善学术基层医疗实践中的慢性病护理。
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Sep;25 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S610-4. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1390-1.
8
Different models to mobilize peer support to improve diabetes self-management and clinical outcomes: evidence, logistics, evaluation considerations and needs for future research.不同的模式调动同伴支持以改善糖尿病自我管理和临床结局:证据、后勤、评估考虑因素和未来研究需求。
Fam Pract. 2010 Jun;27 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i23-32. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmp003. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
9
Cross-cultural and international adaptation of peer support for diabetes management.跨文化和国际背景下的糖尿病管理同伴支持的适应性调整。
Fam Pract. 2010 Jun;27 Suppl 1:i6-16. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmp013. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
10
A growing disparity in diabetes-related mortality U.S. trends, 1989-2005.1989 - 2005年美国糖尿病相关死亡率的差距不断扩大趋势。
Am J Prev Med. 2009 Feb;36(2):126-32. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.09.041. Epub 2008 Dec 5.