Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Assessment. 2019 Apr;26(3):375-385. doi: 10.1177/1073191117709071. Epub 2017 May 15.
Eight measures have been developed to assess maladaptive variants of the five-factor model (FFM) facets specific to personality disorders (e.g., Five-Factor Borderline Inventory [FFBI]). These measures can be used in their entirety or as facet-based scales (e.g., FFBI Affective Dysregulation) to improve the comprehensiveness of assessment of pathological personality. There are a limited number of studies examining these scales with other measures of similar traits (e.g., DSM-5 alternative model). The current study examined the FFM maladaptive scales in relation to the respective general personality traits of the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised and the pathological personality traits of the DSM-5 alternative model using the Personality Inventory for DSM-5. The results indicated the FFM maladaptive trait scales predominantly converged with corresponding NEO Personality Inventory-Revised, and Personality Inventory for DSM-5 traits, providing further validity for these measures as extensions of general personality traits and evidence for their relation to the pathological trait model. Benefits and applications of the FFM maladaptive scales in clinical and research settings are discussed.
已经制定了八项措施来评估特定于人格障碍的五因素模型（FFM）方面的适应不良变体（例如，五因素边缘清单[FFBI]）。这些措施可以整体使用，也可以作为基于方面的量表（例如，FFBI 情感失调）来提高病理性人格评估的全面性。有一些研究检查了这些量表与其他具有相似特征的量表（例如，DSM-5 替代模型）之间的关系。本研究使用 DSM-5 人格量表，检查了 FFM 适应不良量表与 NEO 人格量表修订版的相应一般人格特征和 DSM-5 替代模型的病理性人格特征之间的关系。结果表明，FFM 适应不良特征量表主要与相应的 NEO 人格量表修订版和 DSM-5 人格量表的特征相一致，为这些措施作为一般人格特征的扩展提供了进一步的有效性，并为它们与病理性特征模型的关系提供了证据。讨论了 FFM 适应不良量表在临床和研究环境中的益处和应用。
