Suppr超能文献

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版纸笔版人格问卷巴西版本的心理测量研究

Psychometric study of the brazilian version of the personality inventory for DSM-5-paper-and-pencil version.

作者信息

Barchi-Ferreira Ana Maria, Osório Flávia de Lima

机构信息

Department of Neurosciences and Behavior, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

National Institute of Science and Technology for Translational Medicine, Brasília, Brazil.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 13;13:976831. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.976831. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 - Self Reported Form (PID-5-SRF) operationalizes Criterion B of the personality alternative model of DSM-5 Section III and has already been cross-culturally adapted to many countries. The objective is to present evidence of validity and reliability of the Brazilian version of PID-5 (pencil-and-paper) in a Brazilian community sample. The sample was composed of 730 individuals from the general population [67.8% women, aged 33.84 (SD = ±15.2), 69.5% ≥ 12 years of schooling]. The participants were recruited in academic, organizational, healthcare, and business facilities in three Brazilian states. The snowball method was used. The PID-5 Brazilian version and the Revised NEO-Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI-R) were individually applied, and the retest was applied 30 days after. Satisfactory internal consistency (facets α ≥0.51; domains α ≥0.82) and test-retest reliability (facets ICC ≥ 0.45; domains ICC ≥0.76) were found, but a floor effect was verified in 97.7% of the items. Regarding convergent validity, strong correlations were found between the PID-5 and the NEO-FFI-R domains (r = -0.44 to 0.70). Ten facets did not fit the unidemensional structure. Confirmatory Factor Analyses did not present adequate goodness of fit, and Exploratory Analyses indicated that a five-factor model is more appropriate, though it presents some peculiarities concerning the original model. PID-5 also presented satisfactory goodness of fit to the personality hierarchical model. Generally, the instrument's psychometric indicators favor its use in the Brazilian context. However, some aspects demand attention, and more specific studies should be conducted to verify the impact of reverse-scored items, floor effect, and peculiarities of its internal structure (some facets' multidimensionality and interstitiality) concerning the original model.

摘要

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版》人格量表 - 自陈报告表(PID-5-SRF)对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版》第三部分人格替代模型的B标准进行了操作化定义,并且已经在许多国家进行了跨文化改编。目的是在巴西社区样本中呈现巴西版PID-5(纸笔版)的效度和信度证据。样本由730名普通人群组成[67.8%为女性,年龄33.84岁(标准差 = ±15.2),69.5%接受过≥12年教育]。参与者是在巴西三个州的学术、组织、医疗保健和商业机构招募的。采用了滚雪球抽样法。单独施测巴西版PID-5和修订后的大五人格量表(NEO-FFI-R),并在30天后进行重测。发现内部一致性令人满意(各方面α≥0.51;各领域α≥0.82)以及重测信度(各方面组内相关系数≥0.45;各领域组内相关系数≥0.76),但97.7%的项目存在地板效应。关于聚合效度,在PID-5和NEO-FFI-R各领域之间发现了强相关性(r = -0.44至0.70)。有十个方面不符合单维结构。验证性因素分析未呈现出足够的拟合优度,探索性分析表明五因素模型更合适,尽管它在原始模型方面存在一些特殊性。PID-5对人格层次模型也呈现出令人满意的拟合优度。总体而言,该工具的心理测量指标有利于其在巴西背景下的使用。然而,一些方面需要关注,并且应该进行更具体的研究,以验证反向计分项目、地板效应以及其内部结构(一些方面的多维性和间隙性)相对于原始模型的特殊性所产生的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5939/9513057/02bd1d482b61/fpsyt-13-976831-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验