Grossgasteiger Manuel, Hien Maximilian D, Graser Bastian, Rauch Helmut, Gondan Matthias, Motsch Johann, Rosendal Christian
Research Training Group 1126: Intelligent Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Echocardiography. 2013 Jul;30(6):672-81. doi: 10.1111/echo.12116. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
Transesophageal echocardiography is recommended to monitor left ventricular (LV) size and function in various operations. Generally, two-dimensional (2D) methods are applied intraoperatively. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy and feasibility of 6 commonly used 2D methods to assess LV function during surgery. LV function in 120 consecutive patients was evaluated. Real time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiograpy (3DTEE) served as reference. End-diastolic and end-systolic volumes and ejection fraction (EF) were analyzed with Simpson's method of discs (monoplane [MP] and biplane [BP]), eyeball method, Teichholz' method, and speckle tracking (ST) methods. Furthermore, fractional area change (FAC) and peak systolic pressure rise (dP/dt) were determined. Each 2D method was evaluated regarding correlation and agreement with 3DE, intra- and interobserver variability and the time required for evaluation. Simpson BP showed the strongest correlation and best agreement with 3DE for EF (limits of agreement 3.7 ± 11.6%) and volumes. Simpson MP showed similar agreement with 3DE compared to ST (2.8 ± 14.5% vs. 2.0 ± 15.3% and 3.8 ± 14.4% vs. 1.9 ± 15.6%, respectively). Both the eyeball method and Teichholz' method showed wide limits of agreement (-1.5 ± 18.2% and 5.2 ± 22.1%, respectively). DP/dt did not correlate with 3DE. FAC and ST FAC showed similar agreement. Application of 3DE (429 ± 108 seconds) took the longest time, and the eyeball method took the shortest time (8 ± 5 seconds) for analysis. Simpson BP is the most accurate intraoperative 2D method to evaluate LV function, followed by long-axis MP evaluations. Short-axis views were less accurate but may be suited for monitoring. We do not recommend using dP/dt.
在各种手术中,推荐使用经食管超声心动图来监测左心室(LV)大小和功能。一般来说,术中采用二维(2D)方法。本研究的目的是比较6种常用2D方法在手术期间评估左心室功能的准确性和可行性。对120例连续患者的左心室功能进行了评估。以实时三维经食管超声心动图(3DTEE)作为参考标准。采用辛普森圆盘法(单平面[MP]和双平面[BP])、眼球法、泰希霍尔兹法和斑点追踪(ST)法分析舒张末期和收缩末期容积以及射血分数(EF)。此外,还测定了面积变化分数(FAC)和收缩期峰值压力上升速率(dP/dt)。对每种2D方法在与三维超声心动图(3DE)的相关性和一致性、观察者内和观察者间变异性以及评估所需时间方面进行了评估。辛普森双平面法在EF(一致性界限为3.7±11.6%)和容积方面与3DE的相关性最强且一致性最佳。与ST法相比,辛普森单平面法与3DE的一致性相似(分别为2.8±14.5%对2.0±15.3%以及3.8±14.4%对1.9±15.6%)。眼球法和泰希霍尔兹法的一致性界限都很宽(分别为-1.5±18.2%和5.2±22.1%)。dP/dt与3DE不相关。FAC和ST FAC显示出相似的一致性。3DE分析所需时间最长(429±108秒),眼球法所需时间最短(8±5秒)。辛普森双平面法是术中评估左心室功能最准确的2D方法,其次是长轴单平面评估。短轴视图准确性较低,但可能适合于监测。我们不建议使用dP/dt。