Suppr超能文献

急诊医学中的增强技术模拟:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Technology-enhanced simulation in emergency medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Feb;20(2):117-27. doi: 10.1111/acem.12076.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Technology-enhanced simulation is used frequently in emergency medicine (EM) training programs. Evidence for its effectiveness, however, remains unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of technology-enhanced simulation for training in EM and identify instructional design features associated with improved outcomes by conducting a systematic review.

METHODS

The authors systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, PsychINFO, Scopus, key journals, and previous review bibliographies through May 2011. Original research articles in any language were selected if they compared simulation to no intervention or another educational activity for the purposes of training EM health professionals (including student and practicing physicians, midlevel providers, nurses, and prehospital providers). Reviewers evaluated study quality and abstracted information on learners, instructional design (curricular integration, feedback, repetitive practice, mastery learning), and outcomes.

RESULTS

From a collection of 10,903 articles, 85 eligible studies enrolling 6,099 EM learners were identified. Of these, 56 studies compared simulation to no intervention, 12 compared simulation with another form of instruction, and 19 compared two forms of simulation. Effect sizes were pooled using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity among these studies was large (I(2) ≥ 50%). Among studies comparing simulation to no intervention, pooled effect sizes were large (range = 1.13 to 1.48) for knowledge, time, and skills and small to moderate for behaviors with patients (0.62) and patient effects (0.43; all p < 0.02 except patient effects p = 0.12). Among comparisons between simulation and other forms of instruction, the pooled effect sizes were small (≤ 0.33) for knowledge, time, and process skills (all p > 0.1). Qualitative comparisons of different simulation curricula are limited, although feedback, mastery learning, and higher fidelity were associated with improved learning outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Technology-enhanced simulation for EM learners is associated with moderate or large favorable effects in comparison with no intervention and generally small and nonsignificant benefits in comparison with other instruction. Future research should investigate the features that lead to effective simulation-based instructional design.

摘要

目的

技术增强型模拟在急诊医学(EM)培训计划中经常使用。然而,其有效性的证据仍然不清楚。本研究的目的是通过系统评价评估技术增强型模拟在 EM 培训中的有效性,并确定与改善结果相关的教学设计特征。

方法

作者通过系统搜索 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、ERIC、PsychINFO、Scopus、主要期刊和以前的综述文献,截至 2011 年 5 月。如果原始研究文章将模拟与无干预或其他教育活动进行比较,以培训 EM 卫生专业人员(包括学生和执业医师、中级提供者、护士和院前提供者),则选择使用任何语言的原始研究文章。审查员评估了研究质量,并提取了关于学习者、教学设计(课程整合、反馈、重复练习、掌握学习)和结果的信息。

结果

从收集到的 10903 篇文章中,确定了 85 项符合条件的研究,共纳入 6099 名 EM 学习者。其中,56 项研究将模拟与无干预进行了比较,12 项研究将模拟与另一种形式的教学进行了比较,19 项研究将两种形式的模拟进行了比较。使用随机效应模型汇总效应大小。这些研究之间的异质性很大(I²≥50%)。在将模拟与无干预进行比较的研究中,知识、时间和技能的汇总效应大小较大(范围为 1.13 至 1.48),而与患者的行为(0.62)和患者效果(0.43;除患者效果 p = 0.12 外,所有 p < 0.02)则较小到中等。在模拟与其他形式的教学之间的比较中,知识、时间和过程技能的汇总效应大小较小(≤0.33;所有 p > 0.1)。不同模拟课程的定性比较受到限制,尽管反馈、掌握学习和更高的保真度与学习结果的改善相关。

结论

与无干预相比,技术增强型模拟对 EM 学习者具有中等或较大的有利影响,而与其他教学相比,一般较小且无显著益处。未来的研究应调查导致有效基于模拟的教学设计的特征。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验