• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较两种电子日记中父母对孩子身体活动的认知。

Parents' perceptions of children's physical activity compared on two electronic diaries.

作者信息

Lau Jamie, Engelen Lina, Bundy Anita

机构信息

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2013 Feb;25(1):124-37. doi: 10.1123/pes.25.1.124.

DOI:10.1123/pes.25.1.124
PMID:23406701
Abstract

BACKGROUND

After-school hours provide an opportunity for physical activity (PA). Parental perceptions influence children's PA. The aims were to: compare parents' perceptions of children's PA with objectively measured PA; shed light on PA during after-school hours; and compare two electronic devices for collecting data.

METHODS

Twenty parent-child dyads participated. Children (5-7 years, mean 6.25 ± 0.64) wore Actical accelerometers; their parents responded to activity diaries on electronic devices. Data were collected twice for 4 consecutive weekday afternoons (15.30-19.00).

RESULTS

While parents perceived their children to be quite active, children were, in fact, largely inactive. Parents' responses compared with accelerometer data yielded moderate correlations (r = .44, p < .01). Two thirds of parents' responses were overestimations. Boys were physically more active than girls and had higher PA outdoors than indoors. Girls' PA remained similar indoors and outdoors but parents did not perceive the similarity. Both electronic devices produced similar results and compliance rates.

CONCLUSION

Parents consistently over-reported their children's PA. Findings have implications for initiatives to increase PA. If parents perceive their children as very active, they may lack motivation to promote PA. Parents' limitations as proxy reporters aside, the similarity of results yielded by the two electronic devices suggests that the choice is a matter of researcher preference.

摘要

背景

课余时间为体育活动(PA)提供了机会。父母的认知会影响孩子的体育活动。研究目的是:比较父母对孩子体育活动的认知与客观测量的体育活动情况;了解课余时间的体育活动情况;比较两种用于收集数据的电子设备。

方法

20对亲子参与研究。儿童(5 - 7岁,平均6.25±0.64岁)佩戴Actical加速度计;他们的父母在电子设备上填写活动日记。在连续4个工作日下午(15:30 - 19:00)收集两次数据。

结果

虽然父母认为他们的孩子相当活跃,但实际上孩子大多不活跃。将父母的回答与加速度计数据进行比较,得出中度相关性(r = 0.44,p < 0.01)。三分之二的父母回答存在高估。男孩的身体活动比女孩更活跃,且在户外的体育活动比室内多。女孩在室内和户外的体育活动保持相似,但父母并未察觉到这种相似性。两种电子设备产生了相似的结果和依从率。

结论

父母一直高估他们孩子的体育活动情况。这些发现对增加体育活动的倡议有影响。如果父母认为他们的孩子非常活跃,他们可能缺乏促进体育活动的动力。除了父母作为代理报告者的局限性外,两种电子设备产生的结果相似,这表明选择取决于研究者的偏好。

相似文献

1
Parents' perceptions of children's physical activity compared on two electronic diaries.比较两种电子日记中父母对孩子身体活动的认知。
Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2013 Feb;25(1):124-37. doi: 10.1123/pes.25.1.124.
2
Understanding Patterns of Young Children's Physical Activity After School--It's all About Context: A Cross-Sectional Study.了解幼儿放学后的身体活动模式——一切皆关乎环境:一项横断面研究。
J Phys Act Health. 2015 Mar;12(3):335-9. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2013-0153. Epub 2014 May 9.
3
Objectively measured physical activity in population-representative parent-child pairs: parental modelling matters and is context-specific.在具有代表性的亲子人群中客观测量的身体活动:父母的榜样作用很重要,且具有特定背景。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Aug 17;18(1):1024. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5949-9.
4
Parents' Perceptions of Children's and Adolescents' Use of Electronic Devices to Promote Physical Activity: Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence.家长对儿童和青少年使用电子设备促进身体活动的看法:定性证据的系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Jul 20;11:e44753. doi: 10.2196/44753.
5
Associations between parents' perception of neighbourhood environments and safety with physical activity of primary school children in Klang, Selangor, Malaysia.马来西亚雪兰莪州巴生地区家长对邻里环境和安全的认知与小学生身体活动之间的关联。
Child Care Health Dev. 2016 Jul;42(4):478-85. doi: 10.1111/cch.12355.
6
Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Associations Between Parents' and Preschoolers' Physical Activity and Television Viewing: The HAPPY Study.父母与学龄前儿童身体活动和看电视之间的横断面及纵向关联:快乐研究
J Phys Act Health. 2016 Mar;13(3):269-74. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2015-0136. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
7
Context matters! sources of variability in weekend physical activity among families: a repeated measures study.背景很重要!家庭周末体育活动的变异性来源:一项重复测量研究。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Apr 18;17(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4232-9.
8
Children's perceptions of parental drinking: the eye of the beholder.儿童对父母饮酒的认知:旁观者的视角。
J Stud Alcohol. 1999 Nov;60(6):817-24. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1999.60.817.
9
Perceived and objective neighborhood support for outside of school physical activity in South African children.南非儿童校外体育活动中感知到的和客观存在的邻里支持。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jun 1;16:462. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2860-0.
10
Exploring the effect of parental influence on children's physical activity: The mediating role of children's perceptions of parental support.探讨父母影响对儿童身体活动的影响:儿童对父母支持的感知的中介作用。
Prev Med. 2018 Jan;106:79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.10.018. Epub 2017 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
'You just eyeball it': Parent and nursery staff perceptions and influences on child portion size: A reflexive thematic analysis.“你就凭肉眼估计一下”:家长和托儿所工作人员对儿童食物分量的认知及影响:一项反思性主题分析
Nutr Health. 2025 Jun;31(2):701-714. doi: 10.1177/02601060241245255. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
2
Gender Influences on Physical Activity Awareness of Adolescents and Their Parents.性别对青少年及其父母身体活动认知的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 26;18(11):5707. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115707.
3
"My Tummy Tells Me" Cognitions, Barriers and Supports of Parents and School-Age Children for Appropriate Portion Sizes.
"我的肚子告诉我":家长和学龄儿童对适当份量的认知、障碍和支持。
Nutrients. 2018 Aug 8;10(8):1040. doi: 10.3390/nu10081040.
4
Parents' perceptions of preschool activities: exploring outdoor play.父母对学前活动的看法:探索户外游戏
Early Educ Dev. 2016;27(7):1004-1017. doi: 10.1080/10409289.2016.1156989. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
5
A systematic review of the prevalence of sedentary behavior during the after-school period among children aged 5-18 years.对5至18岁儿童放学后久坐行为患病率的系统评价。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Aug 22;13(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0419-1.
6
The correlates of after-school sedentary behavior among children aged 5-18 years: a systematic review.5至18岁儿童课后久坐行为的相关因素:一项系统综述
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jan 22;16:58. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2659-4.
7
Contribution of the After-School Period to Children's Daily Participation in Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviours.课余时间对儿童日常身体活动和久坐行为参与度的影响
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 30;10(10):e0140132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140132. eCollection 2015.