Suppr超能文献

缺血性心脏病和植入式心脏复律除颤器患者一级预防的死亡率和适当及不适当治疗:来自丹麦 ICD 登记处的数据。

Mortality and appropriate and inappropriate therapy in patients with ischaemic heart disease and implanted cardioverter-defibrillators for primary prevention: data from the Danish ICD Register.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Niels Andersens Vej 65, post-635, 2900 Hellerup, Gentofte, Denmark.

出版信息

Europace. 2013 Aug;15(8):1150-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut017. Epub 2013 Feb 13.

Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate the incidences of and risk factors predisposing to appropriate and inappropriate shocks and mortality in a 'real-world' population of patients with ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this nationwide cohort, we prospectively followed 1609 patients with IHD and left ventricular dysfunction from the Danish ICD Register who received an ICD for primary prevention of SCD (1 January 2007 to 30 November 2011). Primary study outcomes were appropriate shocks, inappropriate shocks, and all-cause mortality. Secondary study outcomes included the composite endpoints: appropriate therapy and inappropriate therapy (defined as shock or anti-tachycardia pacing). All-cause mortality was 12.1% during a mean follow-up time of 1.9 ± 1.3 years. Inappropriate shocks and therapy occurred in 2.6% and 3.7% during follow-up, respectively. Appropriate shocks and therapy was identified in 7.8% and 13.4%, respectively. Time-dependent multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to identify risk factors of inappropriate/appropriate shock, therapy and mortality. Implantation of a dual-chamber ICD was associated with increased risk of both inappropriate shocks and any inappropriate therapy compared to single-chamber ICD [hazard ratios (HR) = 2.45; confidence intervals (CI):1.16-5.14 and HR = 2.38; CI:1.28-4.42, respectively]. No excess risk of mortality was associated with any device type.

CONCLUSION

In this nationwide study of IHD patients with an ICD for primary prevention of SCD, the incidence of appropriate shocks as well as inappropriate shocks were significantly lower than reported in randomized trials. Implantation of a dual-chamber ICD was associated with more inappropriate shocks compared with single chamber devices.

摘要

目的

评估在缺血性心脏病(IHD)和植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)的“真实世界”人群中,导致适当和不适当电击以及死亡率的发生率和危险因素,这些患者接受 ICD 是为了预防心脏性猝死(SCD)。

方法和结果

在这项全国性队列研究中,我们前瞻性地随访了来自丹麦 ICD 登记处的 1609 名 IHD 和左心室功能障碍患者,他们因 SCD 的一级预防而接受了 ICD(2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2011 年 11 月 30 日)。主要研究结果是适当的电击、不适当的电击和全因死亡率。次要研究结果包括复合终点:适当的治疗和不适当的治疗(定义为电击或抗心动过速起搏)。在平均 1.9 ± 1.3 年的随访期间,全因死亡率为 12.1%。在随访期间,分别有 2.6%和 3.7%的患者发生不适当的电击和治疗。分别有 7.8%和 13.4%的患者发生适当的电击和治疗。使用时间依赖性多变量 Cox 回归分析来确定不适当/适当电击、治疗和死亡率的危险因素。与单腔 ICD 相比,植入双腔 ICD 与不适当电击和任何不适当治疗的风险增加相关[风险比(HR)=2.45;置信区间(CI):1.16-5.14 和 HR = 2.38;CI:1.28-4.42]。任何设备类型均与死亡率的增加无关。

结论

在这项针对 IHD 患者 ICD 一级预防 SCD 的全国性研究中,适当电击的发生率以及不适当电击的发生率明显低于随机试验报告的结果。与单腔装置相比,植入双腔 ICD 与更多的不适当电击相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验