Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Department of Surgery, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Am J Transplant. 2013 Apr;13(4):936-942. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12151. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
Organ shortage has led to increased utilization of higher risk liver allografts. In kidneys, aggressive center-level use of one type of higher risk graft clustered with aggressive use of other types. In this study, we explored center-level behavior in liver utilization. We aggregated national liver transplant recipient data between 2005 and 2009 to the center-level, assigning each center an aggressiveness score based on relative utilization of higher risk livers. Aggressive centers had significantly more patients reaching high MELDs (RR 2.19, 2.33 and 2.28 for number of patients reaching MELD>20, MELD>25 and MELD>30, p<0.001), a higher organ shortage ratio (RR 1.51, 1.60 and 1.51 for number of patients reaching MELD>20, MELD>25 and MELD>30 divided by number of organs recovered at the OPO, p<0.04), and were clustered within various geographic regions, particularly regions 2, 3 and 9. Median MELD at transplant was similar between aggressive and nonaggressive centers, but average annual transplant volume was significantly higher at aggressive centers (RR 2.27, 95% CI 1.47-3.51, p<0.001). In cluster analysis, there were no obvious phenotypic patterns among centers with intermediate levels of aggressiveness. In conclusion, highwaitlist disease severity, geographic differences in organ availability, and transplant volume are the main factors associated with the aggressive utilization of higher risk livers.
器官短缺导致高危肝脏移植物的利用率增加。在肾脏中,中心层面积极使用一种高危移植物与积极使用其他类型移植物相结合。在这项研究中,我们探讨了肝脏利用方面的中心行为。我们将 2005 年至 2009 年期间的全国肝脏移植受者数据汇总到中心层面,根据高危肝脏的相对利用情况为每个中心分配一个积极性评分。积极中心的患者达到较高 MELD 评分的比例显著更高(达到 MELD>20、MELD>25 和 MELD>30 的患者人数分别为 2.19、2.33 和 2.28,p<0.001),器官短缺比例也更高(达到 MELD>20、MELD>25 和 MELD>30 的患者人数除以在 OPO 回收的器官数量,分别为 1.51、1.60 和 1.51,p<0.04),并且在各个地理区域内聚集,特别是区域 2、3 和 9。积极中心和非积极中心之间移植时的中位 MELD 评分相似,但积极中心的平均年度移植量明显更高(RR 2.27,95%CI 1.47-3.51,p<0.001)。在聚类分析中,积极性处于中等水平的中心之间没有明显的表型模式。总之,高等待名单疾病严重程度、器官可用性的地理差异和移植量是与高危肝脏积极利用相关的主要因素。