Suppr超能文献

为公平而操纵选区划分:美国肝脏分配的重新划分选区

Gerrymandering for Justice: Redistricting U.S. Liver Allocation.

作者信息

Gentry Sommer, Chow Eric, Massie Allan, Segev Dorry

机构信息

Mathematics Department, United States Naval Academy, Annapolis, Maryland 21402; and Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287.

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287.

出版信息

Interfaces (Providence). 2015 Sep-Oct;45(5):462-480. doi: 10.1287/inte.2015.0810. Epub 2015 Oct 20.

Abstract

U.S. organ allocation policy sequesters livers from deceased donors within arbitrary geographic boundaries, frustrating the intent of those who wish to offer the livers to transplant candidates based on medical urgency. We used a zero-one integer program to partition 58 donor service areas into between four and eight sharing districts that minimize the disparity in liver availability among districts. Because the integer program necessarily suppressed clinically significant differences among patients and organs, we tested the optimized district maps with a discrete-event simulation tool that represents liver allocation at a per-person, per-organ level of detail. In April 2014, the liver committee of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) decided in a unanimous vote of 22-0-0 to write a policy proposal based on our eight-district and four-district maps. The OPTN board of directors could implement the policy after the proposal and public-comment period.Redistricting liver allocation would save hundreds of lives over the next five years and would attenuate the serious geographic inequity in liver transplant offers.

摘要

美国的器官分配政策将已故捐赠者的肝脏限定在任意的地理区域内,这让那些希望根据医疗紧急程度将肝脏提供给移植候选人的人感到沮丧。我们使用一个0-1整数规划模型,将58个供体服务区划分为4至8个共享区,以尽量减少各区域间肝脏可获得性的差异。由于整数规划必然会掩盖患者和器官之间临床上的显著差异,我们使用了一个离散事件模拟工具对优化后的分区地图进行测试,该工具能够在逐个患者、逐个器官的详细层面上模拟肝脏分配情况。2014年4月,器官获取与移植网络(OPTN)肝脏委员会以22比0比0的全票表决结果,决定根据我们的八区和四区地图撰写一份政策提案。在提案和公众意见征询期之后,OPTN董事会可以实施该政策。重新划分肝脏分配区域在未来五年内将挽救数百人的生命,并将减轻肝脏移植供体方面严重的地理不平等现象。

相似文献

1
Gerrymandering for Justice: Redistricting U.S. Liver Allocation.为公平而操纵选区划分:美国肝脏分配的重新划分选区
Interfaces (Providence). 2015 Sep-Oct;45(5):462-480. doi: 10.1287/inte.2015.0810. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
2
Improving Liver Allocation Using Optimized Neighborhoods.利用优化邻域改善肝脏分配
Transplantation. 2017 Feb;101(2):350-359. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001505.
3
Liver allocation and distribution: time for a change.肝脏分配与分布:变革之时。
Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2017 Apr;22(2):162-168. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000397.

引用本文的文献

1
Targeted Broader Sharing for Liver Continuous Distribution.肝脏持续分配的定向更广泛共享
Transplantation. 2025 Jan 1;109(1):e36-e44. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000005184. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
3
Increased Logistical Burden in Circle-based Kidney Allocation.基于循环的肾脏分配中后勤负担的增加
Transplantation. 2022 Oct 1;106(10):1885-1887. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004127. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
4
Heterogeneous donor circles for fair liver transplant allocation.异体供者肝移植公平分配的环。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2024 Mar;27(1):20-45. doi: 10.1007/s10729-022-09602-7. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
6
Heterogeneous Circles for Liver Allocation.不均匀性肝分配
Hepatology. 2021 Jul;74(1):312-321. doi: 10.1002/hep.31648.

本文引用的文献

8
Lung and heart allocation in the United States.美国的肺脏和心脏分配。
Am J Transplant. 2012 Dec;12(12):3213-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04258.x. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
9
Investigating geographic variation in mortality in the context of organ donation.研究器官捐献背景下的死亡率的地域差异。
Am J Transplant. 2012 Jun;12(6):1598-602. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03981.x. Epub 2012 Mar 24.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验