Suppr超能文献

侵袭表型:中心层面的次优肾脏利用模式。

The aggressive phenotype: center-level patterns in the utilization of suboptimal kidneys.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Am J Transplant. 2012 Feb;12(2):400-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03789.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.

Abstract

Despite the fact that suboptimal kidneys have worse outcomes, differences in waiting times and wait-list mortality have led to variations in the use of these kidneys. It is unknown whether aggressive center-level use of one type of suboptimal graft clusters with aggressive use of other types of suboptimal grafts, and what center characteristics are associated with an overall aggressive phenotype. United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data from 2005 to 2009 for adult kidney transplant recipients was aggregated to the center level. An aggressiveness score was assigned to each center based on usage of suboptimal grafts. Deceased-donor transplant volume correlated with aggressiveness in lower volume, but not higher volume centers. Aggressive centers were mostly found in regions 2 and 9. Aggressiveness was associated with wait-list size (RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.20-2.34, p = 0.002), organ shortage (RR 2.30, 95% CI 1.57-3.37, p < 0.001) and waiting times (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.20-2.57, p = 0.004). No centers in single-center OPOs were classified as aggressive. In cluster analysis, the most aggressive centers were aggressive in all metrics and vice versa; however, centers with intermediate aggressiveness had phenotypic patterns in their usage of suboptimal kidneys. In conclusion, wait-list size, waiting times, geographic region and OPO competition seem to be driving factors in center-level aggressiveness.

摘要

尽管次优肾脏的预后较差,但等待时间和等待名单死亡率的差异导致了这些肾脏的使用方式存在差异。目前尚不清楚是否激进的中心级别的使用一种类型的次优移植物与其他类型的次优移植物的使用方式有关,以及哪些中心特征与整体激进表型相关。将 2005 年至 2009 年美国器官共享联合网络(UNOS)的成人肾移植受者数据汇总到中心水平。根据次优移植物的使用情况,为每个中心分配一个激进得分。已故供体移植量与低容量中心的激进性相关,但与高容量中心无关。激进中心主要分布在第 2 区和第 9 区。激进性与等待名单的大小(RR 1.69,95%CI 1.20-2.34,p = 0.002)、器官短缺(RR 2.30,95%CI 1.57-3.37,p < 0.001)和等待时间(RR 1.75,95%CI 1.20-2.57,p = 0.004)有关。在单一器官采购组织(OPO)中没有中心被归类为激进。在聚类分析中,最激进的中心在所有指标上都很激进,反之亦然;然而,具有中间激进性的中心在次优肾脏的使用方面表现出了不同的表型模式。总之,等待名单的大小、等待时间、地理位置和 OPO 竞争似乎是中心级激进性的驱动因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验