• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

侵袭表型:中心层面的次优肾脏利用模式。

The aggressive phenotype: center-level patterns in the utilization of suboptimal kidneys.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Am J Transplant. 2012 Feb;12(2):400-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03789.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03789.x
PMID:21992578
Abstract

Despite the fact that suboptimal kidneys have worse outcomes, differences in waiting times and wait-list mortality have led to variations in the use of these kidneys. It is unknown whether aggressive center-level use of one type of suboptimal graft clusters with aggressive use of other types of suboptimal grafts, and what center characteristics are associated with an overall aggressive phenotype. United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data from 2005 to 2009 for adult kidney transplant recipients was aggregated to the center level. An aggressiveness score was assigned to each center based on usage of suboptimal grafts. Deceased-donor transplant volume correlated with aggressiveness in lower volume, but not higher volume centers. Aggressive centers were mostly found in regions 2 and 9. Aggressiveness was associated with wait-list size (RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.20-2.34, p = 0.002), organ shortage (RR 2.30, 95% CI 1.57-3.37, p < 0.001) and waiting times (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.20-2.57, p = 0.004). No centers in single-center OPOs were classified as aggressive. In cluster analysis, the most aggressive centers were aggressive in all metrics and vice versa; however, centers with intermediate aggressiveness had phenotypic patterns in their usage of suboptimal kidneys. In conclusion, wait-list size, waiting times, geographic region and OPO competition seem to be driving factors in center-level aggressiveness.

摘要

尽管次优肾脏的预后较差,但等待时间和等待名单死亡率的差异导致了这些肾脏的使用方式存在差异。目前尚不清楚是否激进的中心级别的使用一种类型的次优移植物与其他类型的次优移植物的使用方式有关,以及哪些中心特征与整体激进表型相关。将 2005 年至 2009 年美国器官共享联合网络(UNOS)的成人肾移植受者数据汇总到中心水平。根据次优移植物的使用情况,为每个中心分配一个激进得分。已故供体移植量与低容量中心的激进性相关,但与高容量中心无关。激进中心主要分布在第 2 区和第 9 区。激进性与等待名单的大小(RR 1.69,95%CI 1.20-2.34,p = 0.002)、器官短缺(RR 2.30,95%CI 1.57-3.37,p < 0.001)和等待时间(RR 1.75,95%CI 1.20-2.57,p = 0.004)有关。在单一器官采购组织(OPO)中没有中心被归类为激进。在聚类分析中,最激进的中心在所有指标上都很激进,反之亦然;然而,具有中间激进性的中心在次优肾脏的使用方面表现出了不同的表型模式。总之,等待名单的大小、等待时间、地理位置和 OPO 竞争似乎是中心级激进性的驱动因素。

相似文献

1
The aggressive phenotype: center-level patterns in the utilization of suboptimal kidneys.侵袭表型:中心层面的次优肾脏利用模式。
Am J Transplant. 2012 Feb;12(2):400-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03789.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
2
Association Between Declined Offers of Deceased Donor Kidney Allograft and Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Candidates.接受或拒绝已故供体肾移植与肾移植候选人结局的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e1910312. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10312.
3
Major Variation across Local Transplant Centers in Probability of Kidney Transplant for Wait-Listed Patients.不同地方的移植中心在等待移植的患者中进行肾移植的概率存在较大差异。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020 Dec;31(12):2900-2911. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020030335. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
4
Patient and graft outcomes from deceased kidney donors age 70 years and older: an analysis of the Organ Procurement Transplant Network/United Network of Organ Sharing database.70岁及以上已故肾脏供体的患者和移植物结局:器官获取与移植网络/器官共享联合网络数据库分析
Transplantation. 2008 Jun 15;85(11):1573-9. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31817059a1.
5
The aggressive phenotype revisited: utilization of higher-risk liver allografts.再探侵袭表型:高危肝移植物的利用。
Am J Transplant. 2013 Apr;13(4):936-942. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12151. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
6
Poor outcomes for children on the wait list at low-volume kidney transplant centers in the United States.美国低移植量肾脏移植中心等待名单上儿童的不良预后。
Pediatr Nephrol. 2017 Apr;32(4):669-678. doi: 10.1007/s00467-016-3519-x. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
7
Does DCD Donor Time-to-Death Affect Recipient Outcomes? Implications of Time-to-Death at a High-Volume Center in the United States.脑死亡后器官捐献供体的死亡时间会影响受体的预后吗?美国一家高容量中心的死亡时间所带来的影响
Am J Transplant. 2017 Jan;17(1):191-200. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13948. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
8
Organ Procurement Organization and transplant center effects on cadaver renal transplant outcomes.器官获取组织和移植中心对尸体肾移植结果的影响。
Clin Transpl. 1996:427-41.
9
The extent and predictors of waiting time geographic disparity in kidney transplantation in the United States.美国肾移植中等待时间的地域差异的程度和预测因素。
Transplantation. 2014 May 27;97(10):1049-57. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000438623.89310.dc.
10
Preemptive deceased donor kidney transplantation: considerations of equity and utility.抢先进行已故供者肾移植:公平性和实用性的考虑。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Apr;8(4):575-82. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05310512. Epub 2013 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Do Center-specific Factors Impact Utilization of Organs From COVID-positive Donors in the United States?美国特定中心因素会影响新冠病毒检测呈阳性的捐赠者的器官利用情况吗?
Transplant Direct. 2023 Feb 22;9(3):e1456. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001456. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
Factors Underlying Racial Disparity in Utilization of Hepatitis C-Viremic Kidneys in the United States.美国丙型肝炎病毒血症肾脏利用中的种族差异的相关因素。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2023 Oct;10(5):2185-2194. doi: 10.1007/s40615-022-01398-0. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
3
Listing at non-local transplant centers is associated with increased access to deceased donor kidney transplantation.
在非本地移植中心进行登记与增加获得已故供体肾移植的机会有关。
Am J Transplant. 2022 Jul;22(7):1813-1822. doi: 10.1111/ajt.17044. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
4
Examining utilization of kidneys as a function of procurement performance.考察肾脏利用情况与获取绩效之间的关系。
Am J Transplant. 2022 Jun;22(6):1614-1623. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16985. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
5
Major Variation across Local Transplant Centers in Probability of Kidney Transplant for Wait-Listed Patients.不同地方的移植中心在等待移植的患者中进行肾移植的概率存在较大差异。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020 Dec;31(12):2900-2911. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020030335. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
6
Regional Disparities in Transplantation With Deceased Donor Kidneys With Kidney Donor Profile Index Less Than 20% Among Candidates With Top 20% Estimated Post Transplant Survival.移植术后估计生存率处于前20%的候选者中,肾供体特征指数低于20%的已故供体肾脏移植的地区差异。
Prog Transplant. 2019 Dec;29(4):354-360. doi: 10.1177/1526924819874699. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
7
National Variation in Increased Infectious Risk Kidney Offer Acceptance.国家间增加传染性风险的肾脏捐献接受率的差异。
Transplantation. 2019 Oct;103(10):2157-2163. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002631.
8
Association of Kidney Transplant Center Volume With 3-Year Clinical Outcomes.移植中心容量与 3 年临床结果的相关性。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 Oct;74(4):441-451. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.02.019. Epub 2019 May 7.
9
Accelerating kidney allocation: Simultaneously expiring offers.加快肾脏分配:同时到期的要约。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Nov;19(11):3071-3078. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15396. Epub 2019 May 28.
10
Center-level trends in utilization of HCV-exposed donors for HCV-uninfected kidney and liver transplant recipients in the United States.美国经 HCV 暴露供者进行 HCV 阴性肾和肝移植受者的利用中的中等级别趋势。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Aug;19(8):2329-2341. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15355. Epub 2019 Apr 9.