• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃激素、早期倾倒和 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术后体重减轻反应良好和不良患者的静息能量消耗。

Gut hormones, early dumping and resting energy expenditure in patients with good and poor weight loss response after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

机构信息

1] Department of Endocrinology, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hvidovre, Denmark [2] Novo Nordisk Foundation Centre for Basic Metabolic Research, the Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen N, Denmark.

出版信息

Int J Obes (Lond). 2013 Nov;37(11):1452-9. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2013.15. Epub 2013 Feb 19.

DOI:10.1038/ijo.2013.15
PMID:23419600
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors contributing to the variation in weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study of patients with good (excess body mass index lost (EBL) >60%) and poor weight loss response (EBL <50%) >12 months after RYGB and a lean control group matched for age and gender.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixteen patients with good weight loss response, 17 patients with poor weight loss response, and eight control subjects were included in the study. Participants underwent dual energy X-ray absorptiometry scan, indirect calorimetry and a 9 h multiple-meal test with measurements of glucose, insulin, total bile acids (TBA), glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1, peptide YY3-36 (PYY), cholecystokinin (CCK), ghrelin, neurotensin and pancreatic polypeptide (PP) as well as assessment of early dumping and appetite.

RESULTS

Suppression of hunger was more pronounced in the good than the poor responders in response to the multiple-meal test (P=0.006). In addition, the good responders had a larger release of GLP-1 (P=0.009) and a greater suppression of ghrelin (P=0.037) during the test, whereas the postprandial secretion of CCK was highest in the poor responders (P=0.005). PYY, neurotensin, PP and TBA release did not differ between the RYGB-operated groups. Compared with control subjects, patients had exaggerated release of GLP-1 (P<0.001), PYY (P=0.008), CCK (P=0.010) and neurotensin (P<0.001). Early dumping was comparable in the good and poor responders, but more pronounced than in controlled subjects. Differences in resting energy expenditure between the three groups were entirely explained by differences in body composition.

CONCLUSION

Favorable meal-induced changes in hunger and gut hormone release in patients with good compared with poor weight loss response support the role of gut hormones in the weight loss after RYGB.

摘要

目的

确定影响 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB)后体重减轻差异的因素。

设计

对 RYGB 后 12 个月以上体重减轻良好(多余体重指数丢失(EBL)>60%)和体重减轻不良(EBL<50%)的患者和年龄、性别匹配的瘦对照组进行横断面研究。

材料和方法

本研究纳入了 16 例体重减轻良好的患者、17 例体重减轻不良的患者和 8 例对照组。参与者接受双能 X 射线吸收法扫描、间接热量测定和 9 小时多次进餐试验,测量血糖、胰岛素、总胆汁酸(TBA)、胰高血糖素样肽(GLP)-1、肽 YY3-36(PYY)、胆囊收缩素(CCK)、胃饥饿素、神经降压素和胰多肽(PP),并评估早期倾倒和食欲。

结果

与体重减轻不良的患者相比,体重减轻良好的患者在多次进餐试验中对饥饿的抑制更为明显(P=0.006)。此外,良好的应答者在试验中释放出更多的 GLP-1(P=0.009),并抑制了更多的胃饥饿素(P=0.037),而在不良应答者中,餐后 CCK 的分泌最高(P=0.005)。PYY、神经降压素、PP 和 TBA 的释放在 RYGB 手术组之间没有差异。与对照组相比,患者释放出更多的 GLP-1(P<0.001)、PYY(P=0.008)、CCK(P=0.010)和神经降压素(P<0.001)。良好和不良应答者的早期倾倒没有差异,但比对照组更明显。三组之间静息能量消耗的差异完全可以用身体成分的差异来解释。

结论

与体重减轻不良的患者相比,体重减轻良好的患者在进食时饥饿感和肠道激素释放的变化更好,这支持了肠道激素在 RYGB 后体重减轻中的作用。

相似文献

1
Gut hormones, early dumping and resting energy expenditure in patients with good and poor weight loss response after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.胃激素、早期倾倒和 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术后体重减轻反应良好和不良患者的静息能量消耗。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2013 Nov;37(11):1452-9. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2013.15. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
2
Postprandial changes in gut regulatory peptides in gastric bypass patients.胃旁路手术患者餐后肠道调节肽的变化
Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Nov;32(11):1640-6. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2008.157. Epub 2008 Sep 16.
3
Responses of gut and pancreatic hormones, bile acids, and fibroblast growth factor-21 differ to glucose, protein, and fat ingestion after gastric bypass surgery.胃旁路手术后,肠道和胰腺激素、胆汁酸和成纤维细胞生长因子 21 对葡萄糖、蛋白质和脂肪的摄入反应不同。
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2020 Apr 1;318(4):G661-G672. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00265.2019. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
4
Effects of RYGB on energy expenditure, appetite and glycaemic control: a randomized controlled clinical trial.RYGB 对能量消耗、食欲和血糖控制的影响:一项随机对照临床试验。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2016 Feb;40(2):281-90. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2015.162. Epub 2013 Aug 25.
5
Gastrointestinal hormones and weight loss response after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.Roux-en-Y胃旁路术后胃肠激素与体重减轻反应
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Sep-Oct;10(5):814-9. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.01.022. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
6
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: mechanisms of diabetes remission and role of gut hormones.胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术:糖尿病缓解的机制和肠道激素的作用。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Nov;98(11):4391-9. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-2538. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
7
Preoperative assessment of gut hormones does not correlate to weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery.胃旁路手术前对肠道激素的评估与术后体重减轻无关。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Sep-Oct;10(5):822-8. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.04.018. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
8
Changes in gastrointestinal hormone responses, insulin sensitivity, and beta-cell function within 2 weeks after gastric bypass in non-diabetic subjects.胃旁路术后 2 周内非糖尿病患者胃肠激素反应、胰岛素敏感性和胰岛β细胞功能的变化。
Obes Surg. 2012 Jul;22(7):1084-96. doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0621-4.
9
Mechanisms of improved glycaemic control after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.Roux-en-Y胃旁路术后血糖控制改善的机制
Dan Med J. 2015 Apr;62(4):B5057.
10
Effect of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on the distribution and hormone expression of small-intestinal enteroendocrine cells in obese patients with type 2 diabetes.Roux-en-Y胃旁路术对2型糖尿病肥胖患者小肠肠内分泌细胞分布及激素表达的影响
Diabetologia. 2015 Oct;58(10):2254-8. doi: 10.1007/s00125-015-3696-3. Epub 2015 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

1
GLP-1 and GIP may play a role in long-term weight trajectories after gastric bypass.胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)和葡萄糖依赖性促胰岛素多肽(GIP)可能在胃旁路术后的长期体重变化轨迹中发挥作用。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 4;16:1624001. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1624001. eCollection 2025.
2
Cholecystokinin: Clinical aspects of the new biology.胆囊收缩素:新生物学的临床方面
J Intern Med. 2025 Sep;298(3):251-267. doi: 10.1111/joim.20110. Epub 2025 Jun 25.
3
Homeostatic Appetite and Hedonic Hunger 13 Years After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Potential Associations and Predictive Value in Determining Long-Term Weight Loss Outcomes.
Roux-en-Y胃旁路术后13年的稳态食欲与享乐性饥饿:在确定长期体重减轻结果中的潜在关联及预测价值
Obes Surg. 2025 Jun 9. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07955-w.
4
Effects of Weight Loss on Endothelium and Vascular Homeostasis: Impact on Cardiovascular Risk.体重减轻对内皮及血管稳态的影响:对心血管风险的作用
Biomedicines. 2025 Feb 6;13(2):381. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13020381.
5
Effectiveness of Adjuvant Semaglutide Following Bariatric Metabolic Surgery.减重代谢手术后辅助使用司美格鲁肽的疗效
Obes Surg. 2025 Mar;35(3):694-700. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07703-0. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
6
Changes in gastrointestinal motility and gut hormone secretion after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy for individuals with severe obesity.重度肥胖患者接受Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术和袖状胃切除术后胃肠道蠕动及肠道激素分泌的变化
Clin Obes. 2025 Apr;15(2):e12721. doi: 10.1111/cob.12721. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
7
Metabolic adaptation following gastric bypass surgery: results from a 2-year observational study.胃旁路手术后的代谢适应:一项为期 2 年的观察研究结果。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2024 Nov;48(11):1577-1586. doi: 10.1038/s41366-024-01585-5. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
8
Influence of Bariatric Surgery on Gut Microbiota Composition and Its Implication on Brain and Peripheral Targets.减重手术对肠道微生物组成的影响及其对脑和外周靶标的影响。
Nutrients. 2024 Apr 5;16(7):1071. doi: 10.3390/nu16071071.
9
Ramadan fasting following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective online survey cohort study in Egypt.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后的斋月禁食:埃及一项前瞻性在线调查队列研究
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2024 Mar 15;27(1):33-39. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2024.27.1.33.
10
Dietary impact on fasting and stimulated GLP-1 secretion in different metabolic conditions - a narrative review.不同代谢状况下饮食对空腹及刺激后胰高血糖素样肽-1分泌的影响——一篇叙述性综述
Am J Clin Nutr. 2024 Mar;119(3):599-627. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.01.007. Epub 2024 Jan 11.