• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者对干扰素-β和格拉替雷治疗反应的临床和 MRI 预测因子。

Clinical and MRI predictors of response to interferon-beta and glatiramer acetate in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Division of Neuroscience, Institute of Experimental Neurology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Neurol. 2013 Jul;20(7):1060-7. doi: 10.1111/ene.12119. Epub 2013 Feb 20.

DOI:10.1111/ene.12119
PMID:23425504
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

It is still unclear which patients benefit more from available disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) in multiple sclerosis (MS). Our objective is to identify the baseline clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) predictors of response to first-line DMTs in a cohort of relapsing-remitting (RR) MS patients in a real-world clinical setting.

METHODS

Consecutive naïve RRMS patients treated with interferon-beta or glatiramer acetate have been included and followed for 2 years. Patients were grouped into responders (R) in case of absence of clinical and MRI activity, and non-responders (NR) if the on-treatment annualized relapse rate (ARR) reduction was < 50% of the ARR in the 2 years before treatment or in the presence of MRI activity (≥ 2 active lesions at 1-year MRI or ≥ 4 active lesions at 1 + 2-year MRI).

RESULTS

At 2-year follow-up, 272 patients were R (34.6%) and 322 NR (40.9%), and multivariate analysis revealed that a later age at onset of the disease (P < 0.0001), a lower disability (P < 0.0001) and a lower number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions at baseline MRI (P = 0.002) were predictors of efficacy of DMTs. Moreover, the first year response had a good predictive power on the second year, as 73.7% of 1-year R had no evidence of clinical and MRI activity within the ensuing year.

CONCLUSION

A lower baseline MRI and clinical activity have been identified as predictors of DMT efficacy in patients with RRMS in routine clinical practice. Evaluation of clinical and MRI activity at 1 year is recommended to monitor patients over time.

摘要

背景与目的

目前仍不清楚多发性硬化症(MS)患者中哪些患者能从现有的疾病修正治疗(DMT)中获益更多。我们的目的是在真实临床环境中,确定复发缓解型(RR)MS 患者接受一线 DMT 治疗时的基线临床和磁共振成像(MRI)预测指标。

方法

纳入了连续接受干扰素-β或醋酸格拉替雷治疗的初治 RRMS 患者,并进行了 2 年的随访。患者被分为应答者(R)和非应答者(NR)。如果治疗期间的年复发率(ARR)降低<治疗前 2 年的 ARR 的 50%,或存在 MRI 活动(1 年 MRI 时≥2 个活跃病灶或 1+2 年 MRI 时≥4 个活跃病灶),则为 NR。

结果

在 2 年随访时,272 例患者为 R(34.6%),322 例患者为 NR(40.9%)。多变量分析显示,疾病发病年龄较晚(P<0.0001)、残疾程度较低(P<0.0001)和基线 MRI 时钆增强病灶较少(P=0.002)是 DMT 疗效的预测指标。此外,第 1 年的反应对第 2 年有很好的预测能力,因为 73.7%的第 1 年 R 在随后的 1 年内没有临床和 MRI 活动的证据。

结论

在常规临床实践中,RRMS 患者的基线 MRI 和临床活动较低被确定为 DMT 疗效的预测指标。建议在第 1 年评估临床和 MRI 活动,以监测患者随时间的变化。

相似文献

1
Clinical and MRI predictors of response to interferon-beta and glatiramer acetate in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients.复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者对干扰素-β和格拉替雷治疗反应的临床和 MRI 预测因子。
Eur J Neurol. 2013 Jul;20(7):1060-7. doi: 10.1111/ene.12119. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
2
Interferons-beta versus glatiramer acetate for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.β-干扰素与醋酸格拉替雷治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 26(7):CD009333. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009333.pub2.
3
Comparison of subcutaneous interferon beta-1a with glatiramer acetate in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (the REbif vs Glatiramer Acetate in Relapsing MS Disease [REGARD] study): a multicentre, randomised, parallel, open-label trial.皮下注射干扰素β-1a与醋酸格拉替雷治疗复发型多发性硬化症的比较(复发型多发性硬化症中重组人干扰素β-1a对比醋酸格拉替雷[REGARD]研究):一项多中心、随机、平行、开放标签试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2008 Oct;7(10):903-14. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70200-X. Epub 2008 Sep 11.
4
Evaluating the response to glatiramer acetate in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients.评估复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)患者对醋酸格拉替雷的反应。
Mult Scler. 2014 Oct;20(12):1602-8. doi: 10.1177/1352458514527863. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
5
Efficacy of natalizumab in second line therapy of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: results from a multi-center study in German speaking countries.那他珠单抗二线治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的疗效:一项多中心德语国家研究结果。
Eur J Neurol. 2010 Jan;17(1):31-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02728.x. Epub 2009 Jul 9.
6
Clinical course after change of immunomodulating therapy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.复发缓解型多发性硬化症免疫调节治疗变更后的临床病程
Eur J Neurol. 2006 May;13(5):471-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01273.x.
7
Post-marketing survey on clinical response to interferon beta in relapsing multiple sclerosis: the Roman experience.复发型多发性硬化症中干扰素β临床反应的上市后调查:罗马经验
Neurol Sci. 2005 Dec;26 Suppl 4:S174-8. doi: 10.1007/s10072-005-0510-x.
8
Long-term subcutaneous interferon beta-1a therapy in patients with relapsing-remitting MS.复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者的长期皮下注射干扰素β-1a治疗
Neurology. 2006 Sep 26;67(6):944-53. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000237994.95410.ce.
9
Relationship between MRI lesion activity and response to IFN-beta in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients.复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者中MRI病变活动与对干扰素-β反应之间的关系。
Mult Scler. 2008 May;14(4):479-84. doi: 10.1177/1352458507085555.
10
A prospective, open-label treatment trial to compare the effect of IFNbeta-1a (Avonex), IFNbeta-1b (Betaseron), and glatiramer acetate (Copaxone) on the relapse rate in relapsing--remitting multiple sclerosis: results after 18 months of therapy.一项前瞻性、开放标签治疗试验,比较干扰素β-1a(阿沃尼)、干扰素β-1b(倍泰龙)和醋酸格拉替雷(考帕松)对复发缓解型多发性硬化症复发率的影响:治疗18个月后的结果。
Mult Scler. 2001 Dec;7(6):349-53. doi: 10.1177/135245850100700601.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurological updates: neurological complications of CAR-T therapy.神经学最新动态:嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞疗法的神经并发症。
J Neurol. 2021 Apr;268(4):1544-1554. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-10237-3. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
2
Unraveling treatment response in multiple sclerosis: A clinical and MRI challenge.解析多发性硬化症的治疗反应:临床与 MRI 面临的挑战。
Neurology. 2019 Jan 22;92(4):180-192. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006810. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
3
Dynamic Learning of Patient Response Types: An Application to Treating Chronic Diseases.患者反应类型的动态学习:在慢性病治疗中的应用
Manage Sci. 2018 Aug;64(8):3469-3970. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2017.2793. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
4
Brain and retinal atrophy in African-Americans versus Caucasian-Americans with multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal study.非裔美国人和白种人美国人多发性硬化症的脑和视网膜萎缩:一项纵向研究。
Brain. 2018 Nov 1;141(11):3115-3129. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy245.
5
Effectiveness and baseline factors associated to fingolimod response in a real-world study on multiple sclerosis patients.在一项多发性硬化症患者的真实世界研究中,评估芬戈莫德有效性的相关因素及基础情况。
J Neurol. 2018 Apr;265(4):896-905. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-8791-1. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
6
SUMMIT (Serially Unified Multicenter Multiple Sclerosis Investigation): creating a repository of deeply phenotyped contemporary multiple sclerosis cohorts.SUMMIT(连续统一的多中心多发性硬化症研究):创建一个深度表型化的当代多发性硬化症队列资料库。
Mult Scler. 2018 Oct;24(11):1485-1498. doi: 10.1177/1352458517726657. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
7
Predicting long-term disability outcomes in patients with MS treated with teriflunomide in TEMSO.在TEMSO研究中预测接受特立氟胺治疗的多发性硬化症患者的长期残疾结局。
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2017 Jun 28;4(5):e379. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000379. eCollection 2017 Sep.
8
Imaging Markers for Monitoring Disease Activity in Multiple Sclerosis.用于监测多发性硬化症疾病活动的影像学标志物。
Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2017 May;19(5):18. doi: 10.1007/s11940-017-0453-6.
9
Long-term evolution of multiple sclerosis disability in the treatment era.治疗时代多发性硬化症残疾的长期演变。
Ann Neurol. 2016 Oct;80(4):499-510. doi: 10.1002/ana.24747. Epub 2016 Aug 13.
10
Comparative efficacy of first-line natalizumab vs IFN-β or glatiramer acetate in relapsing MS.一线那他珠单抗与干扰素-β或醋酸格拉替雷在复发型多发性硬化症中的疗效比较。
Neurol Clin Pract. 2016 Apr;6(2):102-115. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000227.