Spelman Tim, Kalincik Tomas, Jokubaitis Vilija, Zhang Annie, Pellegrini Fabio, Wiendl Heinz, Belachew Shibeshih, Hyde Robert, Verheul Freek, Lugaresi Alessandra, Havrdová Eva, Horáková Dana, Grammond Pierre, Duquette Pierre, Prat Alexandre, Iuliano Gerardo, Terzi Murat, Izquierdo Guillermo, Hupperts Raymond M M, Boz Cavit, Pucci Eugenio, Giuliani Giorgio, Sola Patrizia, Spitaleri Daniele L A, Lechner-Scott Jeannette, Bergamaschi Roberto, Grand'Maison François, Granella Franco, Kappos Ludwig, Trojano Maria, Butzkueven Helmut
Department of Medicine and Melbourne Brain Centre at the Royal Melbourne Hospital (TS, TK, VJ, HB), University of Melbourne, Australia; Biogen Idec Inc. (AZ, FP, SB, RH), Cambridge, MA; Department of Neurology (HW), University of Münster, Germany; Groene Hart Ziekenhuis (FV), Gouda, the Netherlands; MS Center, Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences (AL), University "G. d'Annunzio," Chieti, Italy; MS Center, Department of Neurology, First Medical Faculty (EH, DH), Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Center de Réadaptation Déficience Physique Chaudière-Appalache (PG), Levis; Hôpital Notre Dame (PD, AP), Montreal, Canada; Ospedali Riuniti di Salerno (G. Iuliano), Salerno, Italy; 19 Mayis University (M. Terzi), Medical Faculty, Turkey; Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena (G. Izquierdo), Sevilla, Spain; Orbis Medical Centre (RMMH), Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands; KTU Medical Faculty Farabi Hospital (CB), Trabzon, Turkey; Neurology Unit (EP, GG), ASUR Marche-AV3, Macerata; Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino (PS), Modena; AORN San Giuseppe Moscati (DLAS), Avellino, Italy; John Hunter Hospital (JL-S), Newcastle, Australia; Neurological Institute IRCCS Mondino (RB), Pavia, Italy; Neuro Rive-Sud (F. Grand'Maison), Hôpital Charles LeMoyne, Quebec, Canada; University of Parma (F. Granella), Italy; Department of Neurology (LK), University Hospital Basel, Switzerland; Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs (M. Trojano), University of Bari, Italy; and Department of Neurology (HB), Eastern Health, Monash University, Australia.
Neurol Clin Pract. 2016 Apr;6(2):102-115. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000227.
We compared efficacy and treatment persistence in treatment-naive patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) initiating natalizumab compared with interferon-β (IFN-β)/glatiramer acetate (GA) therapies, using propensity score-matched cohorts from observational multiple sclerosis registries.
The study population initiated IFN-β/GA in the MSBase Registry or natalizumab in the Tysabri Observational Program, had ≥3 months of on-treatment follow-up, and had active RRMS, defined as ≥1 gadolinium-enhancing lesion on cerebral MRI at baseline or ≥1 relapse within the 12 months prior to baseline. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were balanced between propensity-matched groups. Annualized relapse rate (ARR), time to first relapse, treatment persistence, and disability outcomes were compared between matched treatment arms in the total population (n = 366/group) and subgroups with higher baseline disease activity.
First-line natalizumab was associated with a 68% relative reduction in ARR from a mean (SD) of 0.63 (0.92) on IFN-β/GA to 0.20 (0.63) ( [signed-rank] < 0.0001), a 64% reduction in the rate of first relapse (hazard ratio [HR] 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28-0.47; < 0.001), and a 27% reduction in the rate of discontinuation (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.58-0.93; = 0.01), compared with first-line IFN-β/GA therapy. Confirmed disability progression and area under the Expanded Disability Status Scale-time curve analyses were not significant. Similar relapse and treatment persistence results were observed in each of the higher disease activity subgroups.
This study provides Class IV evidence that first-line natalizumab for RRMS improves relapse and treatment persistence outcomes compared to first-line IFN-β/GA. This needs to be balanced against the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in natalizumab-treated patients.
This study provides Class IV evidence that first-line natalizumab for RRMS improves relapse rates and treatment persistence outcomes compared to first-line IFN-β/GA.
我们使用来自观察性多发性硬化症登记处的倾向评分匹配队列,比较了初治复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)患者起始使用那他珠单抗与干扰素-β(IFN-β)/醋酸格拉替雷(GA)治疗的疗效和治疗持久性。
研究人群在MSBase登记处起始使用IFN-β/GA或在那他珠单抗观察项目中起始使用那他珠单抗,接受治疗随访≥3个月,患有活动性RRMS,定义为基线时脑MRI上≥1个钆增强病灶或基线前12个月内≥1次复发。倾向匹配组之间的基线人口统计学和疾病特征保持平衡。比较了总人群(每组n = 366)和基线疾病活动度较高亚组中匹配治疗组之间的年化复发率(ARR)、首次复发时间、治疗持久性和残疾结局。
一线使用那他珠单抗与ARR相对降低68%相关,从IFN-β/GA组的平均(标准差)0.63(0.92)降至0.20(0.63)([符号秩检验]<0.0001),首次复发率降低64%(风险比[HR] 0.36,95%置信区间[CI] 0.28 - 0.47;<0.001),停药率降低27%(HR 0.73,95% CI 0.58 - 0.93;= 0.01),与一线IFN-β/GA治疗相比。确认的残疾进展和扩展残疾状态量表 - 时间曲线下面积分析无显著差异。在每个疾病活动度较高的亚组中均观察到类似的复发和治疗持久性结果。
本研究提供了IV类证据,表明RRMS患者一线使用那他珠单抗与一线IFN-β/GA相比,可改善复发和治疗持久性结局。这需要与那他珠单抗治疗患者发生进行性多灶性白质脑病的风险相权衡。
本研究提供了IV类证据,表明RRMS患者一线使用那他珠单抗与一线IFN-β/GA相比,可提高复发率和治疗持久性结局。