• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性心肌梗死即刻与延迟支架置入的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Immediate vs. delayed stenting in acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2013 Feb 22;8(10):1207-16. doi: 10.4244/EIJV8I10A185.

DOI:10.4244/EIJV8I10A185
PMID:23425545
Abstract

AIMS

To conduct a meta-analysis of studies comparing immediate versus delayed stenting in populations where primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or early invasive revascularisation was the initial mode of reperfusion.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We identified five non-randomised studies and one randomised trial for a total of 590 patients in studies comparing immediate to delayed stenting in populations where primary PCI or early invasive revascularisation was the initial mode of reperfusion. In non-randomised studies, delayed stenting was associated with a reduction of procedure-related angiographic events (OR=0.13, 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.03- 0.36). No differences were observed in the rates of major bleeding (OR=0.81, 95% CrI: 0.01-13.42) and major adverse cardiac events (OR=0.40, 95% CrI: 0.09-1.91), between delayed and immediate stenting. In one randomised trial, delayed stenting was associated with a reduction in myocardial infarction during hospitalisation (39% vs. 60%; relative risk [RR]=0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39-0.80). None of the patients assigned to delayed stenting experienced a major adverse cardiac event in the interval between the initial angiogram and the stenting.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed stent implantation is associated with better angiographic outcomes. Randomised trials are required to assess whether delayed stenting translates into better long-term cardiac outcomes.

摘要

目的

对比较直接支架置入与延迟支架置入的研究进行荟萃分析,这些研究的人群中,初始再灌注方式为经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)或早期侵入性血运重建。

方法和结果

我们共纳入了 5 项非随机研究和 1 项随机试验,共纳入了 590 例在初始再灌注方式为经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或早期侵入性血运重建的人群中比较直接支架置入与延迟支架置入的研究。在非随机研究中,延迟支架置入与降低与操作相关的血管造影事件相关(OR=0.13,95%可信区间[CrI]:0.03-0.36)。在主要出血(OR=0.81,95%CrI:0.01-13.42)和主要不良心脏事件(OR=0.40,95%CrI:0.09-1.91)的发生率方面,延迟支架置入与直接支架置入之间无差异。在一项随机试验中,延迟支架置入与住院期间心肌梗死发生率降低相关(39%比 60%;相对风险[RR]=0.55,95%置信区间[CI]:0.39-0.80)。在初始血管造影和支架置入之间的间隔期间,无延迟支架置入组的患者发生主要不良心脏事件。

结论

延迟支架置入与更好的血管造影结果相关。需要进行随机试验来评估延迟支架置入是否转化为更好的长期心脏结局。

相似文献

1
Immediate vs. delayed stenting in acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.急性心肌梗死即刻与延迟支架置入的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
EuroIntervention. 2013 Feb 22;8(10):1207-16. doi: 10.4244/EIJV8I10A185.
2
Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents for acute coronary syndrome.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架治疗急性冠状动脉综合征的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 23;8(8):CD012481. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012481.pub2.
3
Coronary artery stents: a rapid systematic review and economic evaluation.冠状动脉支架:一项快速系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(35):iii-iv, 1-242. doi: 10.3310/hta8350.
4
Routine invasive strategies versus selective invasive strategies for unstable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in the stent era.支架时代不稳定型心绞痛和非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的常规侵入性策略与选择性侵入性策略
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 26;2016(5):CD004815. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004815.pub4.
5
Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases.用于心血管疾病一级和二级预防的饮食预防高血压(DASH)方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 6;5(5):CD013729. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013729.pub2.
6
Preoperative coronary interventions for preventing acute myocardial infarction in the perioperative period of major open vascular or endovascular surgery.术前冠状动脉介入治疗预防大型开放性血管或血管内手术后围手术期急性心肌梗死。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 3;7(7):CD014920. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014920.pub2.
7
Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting for people with stable angina or acute coronary syndromes.对于稳定型心绞痛或急性冠状动脉综合征患者,经皮冠状动脉腔内血管成形术加支架置入术与冠状动脉旁路移植术的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25;2005(1):CD004588. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004588.pub3.
8
Early invasive versus conservative strategies for unstable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in the stent era.支架时代不稳定型心绞痛和非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的早期侵入性策略与保守策略
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17(3):CD004815. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004815.pub3.
9
Angioplasty or stenting for deep venous thrombosis.血管成形术或支架置入术治疗深静脉血栓形成。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 19;2(2):CD011468. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011468.pub2.
10
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease.基于运动的冠心病心脏康复。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 6;11(11):CD001800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub4.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Impact and Financial Implications of Immediate versus Delayed Stenting Strategies in High Thrombus Burden Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.评估高血栓负荷急性心肌梗死中即刻与延迟支架置入策略的影响及财务影响:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Oct 24;25(10):381. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2510381. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Deferred Stenting in Geriatric Patients with STEMI and High Thrombus Burden.延迟支架置入术在老年ST段抬高型心肌梗死伴高血栓负荷患者中的疗效和安全性
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Mar 5;25(3):88. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2503088. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Stenting deferral in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: exploring benefits and suitable interval in heavy thrombus burden.
在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中延迟支架置入:探讨在血栓负荷较重情况下的益处及合适的间隔时间。
Egypt Heart J. 2021 Sep 9;73(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s43044-021-00203-3.
4
Deferred Stenting for Heavy Thrombus Burden During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Elevation MI.ST段抬高型心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间对重度血栓负荷进行延迟支架置入术。
Eur Cardiol. 2021 Mar 30;16:e08. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2020.31. eCollection 2021 Feb.
5
Immediate versus deferred percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with acute coronary syndrome: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.即刻与延迟经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性冠状动脉综合征患者的Meta 分析:随机对照试验研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 2;15(7):e0234655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234655. eCollection 2020.
6
Optimal strategy of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction due to unprotected left main coronary artery occlusion (OPTIMAL): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.无保护左主干冠状动脉闭塞所致急性心肌梗死的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗优化策略(OPTIMAL):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2019 Mar 8;20(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3211-0.
7
Effects of milrinone on serum IL-6, TNF-α, Cys-C and cardiac functions of patients with chronic heart failure.米力农对慢性心力衰竭患者血清白细胞介素-6、肿瘤坏死因子-α、胱抑素-C及心功能的影响
Exp Ther Med. 2018 Nov;16(5):4162-4166. doi: 10.3892/etm.2018.6672. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
8
Delayed vs. immediate stenting in STEMI with a high thrombus burden : A systematic review and meta-analysis.高血栓负荷ST段抬高型心肌梗死中延迟支架置入与即刻支架置入的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Herz. 2019 Dec;44(8):726-734. doi: 10.1007/s00059-018-4699-x. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
9
Immediate versus deferred stenting for patients undergoing primary or emergent percutaneous coronary intervention: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.接受直接或急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的即刻支架置入与延迟支架置入:系统评价和荟萃分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Nov;96(47):e8477. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008477.
10
() Editorial: the Minimalist Immediate Mechanical Intervention study.()社论:极简主义即刻机械干预研究
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017 Jun;7(Suppl 2):S73-S76. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2017.01.13.