Mourits M P, Koornneef L, Wiersinga W M, Prummel M F, Berghout A, van der Gaag R
Orbital Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ophthalmology. 1990 May;97(5):636-41. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(90)32532-0.
To test the efficacy and safety of orbital decompression for Graves' ophthalmopathy, the authors studied the records of 60 consecutive patients who were operated on for dysthyroid optic neuropathy or for rehabilitative purposes. Patients decompressed for neuropathy were older, had less proptosis, and a shorter duration of eye disease than patients operated on for disfigurement. The authors compared the results of three surgical procedures including the inferomedial, the inferomedial plus lateral, and the coronal approach. Regarding improvement of visual function, no difference was found between the three techniques. Patients in whom vision failed to recover had a high prevalence of diabetes mellitus. Proptosis reduction varied from 1 to 9 mm, depending on the number of walls decompressed. There was no net change in the prevalence of diplopia. Persistent complications were seen in less than 5% of all decompressions. The authors conclude that orbital decompression for Graves' ophthalmopathy is safe and efficacious, regardless of surgical procedure. However, the coronal approach gives the best cosmetic results.
为了测试眼眶减压术治疗Graves眼病的疗效和安全性,作者研究了60例连续接受手术治疗的甲状腺相关性视神经病变或出于康复目的患者的记录。因视神经病变而接受减压手术的患者比因容貌问题接受手术的患者年龄更大、眼球突出度更小、眼病病程更短。作者比较了三种手术方法的结果,包括眶内下壁、眶内下壁加外侧壁以及冠状入路。在视觉功能改善方面,三种技术之间未发现差异。视力未能恢复的患者中糖尿病患病率很高。眼球突出度降低幅度为1至9毫米,具体取决于减压的壁数。复视的患病率没有净变化。在所有减压手术中,持续并发症的发生率不到5%。作者得出结论,无论采用何种手术方法,眼眶减压术治疗Graves眼病都是安全有效的。然而,冠状入路的美容效果最佳。