Hu Yong, Kepler Christopher K, Albert Todd J, Hann Shannon, Ma Wei-Hu, Yuan Zhen-Shan, Dong Wei-Xin, Xu Rong-Ming
*Department of Spinal Surgery, Ningbo No. 6 Hospital, NingBo, People's Republic of China†Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University & Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA.
Clin Spine Surg. 2016 Feb;29(1):E49-54. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31828984f9.
A retrospective case series describing teardrop fracture of the axis.
The purpose of the study was to clarify the clinical features, the mechanism of injury, and the potential instability of extension teardrop fractures of the axis, so as to emphasize the importance of recognizing this injury as a separate entity.
Teardrop fractures of the axis are rare spinal fractures, comprising only a small percentage of all injuries of the cervical spine. The stability of this fracture pattern has been a matter of debate leading to controversy regarding treatment strategies and the need for stabilization.
We retrospectively reviewed data collected from 16 patients to document the mechanism of injury, neurological deficit, treatment and clinical outcome, and imaging findings.
Extension teardrop fractures accounted for approximately 8.9% of the upper cervical spinal injuries and 12.7% of axis fractures at the authors' institution over the same period. Six patients (4 males and 2 females) underwent surgery (4 by an anterior approach, 2 by a posterior approach). Ten cases underwent Halo-vest immobilization for a period between 6 and 12 weeks. At final follow-up, 14 cases achieved excellent results, whereas 2 patients complained of mild residual neck pain. Maximum cranial-caudal dimensions of the fragments were between 5 and 24 mm (average, 12.9 mm), and the transverse dimensions were between 5 and 22 mm (average, 11.1 mm). Fragment displacement ranged from 1 to 9 mm (average, 3.5 mm), whereas fragment rotation ranged from 10 to 52 degrees (average, 24.4 degrees) in the sagittal plane.
Most patients with an extension teardrop fracture of the axis can be treated conservatively. On the basis of this case series, the authors suggest that large fragment size, displacement or angulation, intervertebral disk injury, neurologic deficit, or signs of instability are reasonable indications for surgical treatment.
一项描述枢椎泪滴形骨折的回顾性病例系列研究。
本研究的目的是阐明枢椎伸展性泪滴形骨折的临床特征、损伤机制及潜在不稳定性,以强调将此损伤视为一个独立实体的重要性。
枢椎泪滴形骨折是罕见的脊柱骨折,仅占颈椎所有损伤的一小部分。这种骨折类型的稳定性一直存在争议,导致治疗策略及稳定必要性方面存在争议。
我们回顾性分析了16例患者的数据,记录损伤机制、神经功能缺损、治疗及临床结果以及影像学表现。
在作者所在机构同期,伸展性泪滴形骨折约占上颈椎损伤的8.9%,占枢椎骨折的12.7%。6例患者(4例男性,2例女性)接受了手术(4例采用前路,2例采用后路)。10例患者接受了6至12周的头环背心固定。末次随访时,14例患者效果良好,而2例患者仍有轻度颈部残留疼痛。骨折块的最大头尾径在5至24毫米之间(平均12.9毫米),横径在5至22毫米之间(平均11.1毫米)。骨折块移位范围为1至9毫米(平均3.5毫米),而骨折块在矢状面的旋转范围为10至52度(平均24.4度)。
大多数枢椎伸展性泪滴形骨折患者可采用保守治疗。基于本病例系列,作者认为骨折块尺寸大、移位或成角、椎间盘损伤、神经功能缺损或不稳定迹象是手术治疗的合理指征。