Ferrans C E
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1990 May-Jun;17(3 Suppl):15-9; discussion 20-1.
This study developed an instrument to measure the quality of life (QOL) of patients with cancer that would account for individual values, as well as satisfaction. The sample consisted of patients with breast cancer (n = 111) listed in the tumor registry of a major hospital. Ferrans and Power's Quality of Life Index (QLI) was modified based on an extensive review of the oncology literature, which supported content validity. The findings supported the internal consistency reliability of the entire QLI (alpha = 0.95) and of the four subscales: health and functioning, socioeconomic, psychological/spiritual, and family (alphas = 0.90, 0.84, 0.93, and 0.66, respectively). Support for concurrent validity was provided by a strong correlation (r = 0.80) between the QLI and a measure of satisfaction with life. Support for construct validity was provided by significantly higher mean QOL scores for subjects who had less pain, less depression, and were coping better with stress, using the known group technique. The positive results obtained from this assessment and the fact that many patients can complete the QLI independently are important variables to consider when health professionals are selecting instruments for research and practice.
本研究开发了一种工具,用于测量癌症患者的生活质量(QOL),该工具将考虑个体价值观以及满意度。样本包括一家大型医院肿瘤登记处登记的乳腺癌患者(n = 111)。在对肿瘤学文献进行广泛综述的基础上,对费兰斯和鲍尔的生活质量指数(QLI)进行了修改,这支持了内容效度。研究结果支持了整个QLI(α = 0.95)以及四个子量表(健康与功能、社会经济、心理/精神和家庭,α值分别为0.90、0.84、0.93和0.66)的内部一致性信度。QLI与生活满意度测量之间的强相关性(r = 0.80)为同时效度提供了支持。使用已知群体技术,疼痛较轻、抑郁程度较低且应对压力较好的受试者的平均QOL得分显著更高,这为结构效度提供了支持。从该评估中获得 的积极结果以及许多患者能够独立完成QLI这一事实,是卫生专业人员在选择研究和实践工具时需要考虑的重要变量。