Laboratorio de Micologia, Hospital del Niño Jesús, Tucumán, Argentina.
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2013 Feb;108(1):126-9. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762013000100023.
In this study, we evaluated several techniques for the detection of the yeast form of Cryptococcus in decaying wood and measured the viability of these fungi in environmental samples stored in the laboratory. Samples were collected from a tree known to be positive for Cryptococcus and were each inoculated on 10 Niger seed agar (NSA) plates. The conventional technique (CT) yielded a greater number of positive samples and indicated a higher fungal density [in colony forming units per gram of wood (CFU x g(-1))] compared to the humid swab technique (ST). However, the difference in positive and false negative results between the CT-ST was not significant. The threshold of detection for the CT was 0.05.10³ CFU x g(-1), while the threshold for the ST was greater than 0.1.10³ CFU(-1). No colonies were recovered using the dry swab technique. We also determined the viability of Cryptococcus in wood samples stored for 45 days at 25ºC using the CT and ST and found that samples not only continued to yield a positive response, but also exhibited an increase in CFU x g(-1), suggesting that Cryptococcus is able to grow in stored environmental samples. The ST.1, in which samples collected with swabs were immediately plated on NSA medium, was more efficient and less laborious than either the CT or ST and required approximately 10 min to perform; however, additional studies are needed to validate this technique.
在这项研究中,我们评估了几种检测腐朽木材中隐球菌酵母形式的技术,并测量了这些真菌在实验室储存的环境样本中的生存能力。从一棵已知为隐球菌阳性的树上采集了样本,并将每个样本接种到 10 个尼日尔种子琼脂(NSA)平板上。传统技术(CT)产生了更多的阳性样本,并表明真菌密度[每克木材的菌落形成单位(CFU x g(-1))]高于湿拭子技术(ST)。然而,CT-ST 之间的阳性和假阴性结果差异并不显著。CT 的检测阈值为 0.05.10³ CFU x g(-1),而 ST 的检测阈值大于 0.1.10³ CFU(-1)。干拭子技术未回收任何菌落。我们还使用 CT 和 ST 确定了在 25°C 下储存 45 天的木材样本中隐球菌的生存能力,发现样本不仅继续产生阳性反应,而且 CFU x g(-1)也有所增加,表明隐球菌能够在储存的环境样本中生长。ST.1 是一种更有效的方法,其中使用拭子收集的样本立即接种到 NSA 培养基上,比 CT 或 ST 更高效且劳动强度更小,执行时间约为 10 分钟;然而,需要进一步的研究来验证这项技术。