Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, 243 Charles St., Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Otol Neurotol. 2013 Feb;34(2):360-7. doi: 10.1097/mao.0b013e31827b4fb5.
To compare the audiometric and cervical vestibular evoked muscle potential (cVEMP) outcomes of ears with superior canal dehiscence (SSCD) to outcomes from normal ears and the unaffected ears of unilateral SSCD patients.
Retrospective review of clinical testing outcomes.
Tertiary care specialty teaching hospital.
Three subject groups were used: 21 ears of healthy subjects, ages 21 to 52 years; 58 affected SSCD ears in patients, ages 15 to 65 years; and 26 unaffected ears of unilateral SSCD patients, ages 15 to 65 years.
Results of pure-tone audiometry and cervical vestibular evoked muscle potential (cVEMP) testing.
SSCD ears differed from normal ears or unaffected ears of unilateral SSCD patients in 2 ways: 1) they had significantly larger air-bone gaps at 250 and 500 Hz, resulting in poorer air-conduction thresholds at those frequencies, and 2) their cVEMP thresholds at 500 Hz were significantly lower. When the cVEMP threshold was adjusted for the size of the air-bone gap on the audiogram, cVEMP thresholds were significantly lower for 250-, 500-, and 1,000-Hz tone bursts compared with the other subject groups. Logistic regression indicated that the probability of predicting SSCD from the cVEMP thresholds was significant. cVEMP tuning was unaffected by SSCD.
Combining 2 features associated with SSCD, the presence of an air-bone gap and the lower cVEMP threshold, into one variable, an adjusted cVEMP threshold, better separated SSCD ears from normal or unaffected SSCD ears. A probability predictive function from logistic regression of the adjusted cVEMP may be clinically applicable.
比较伴有上半规管裂(SSCD)的耳朵与正常耳朵以及单侧 SSCD 患者未受影响耳朵的听力和颈性前庭诱发肌源性电位(cVEMP)结果。
临床检测结果的回顾性分析。
三级保健专科教学医院。
使用了 3 组受试者:21 只健康受试者的耳朵,年龄 21 至 52 岁;58 只患有 SSCD 的患者耳朵,年龄 15 至 65 岁;以及 26 只单侧 SSCD 患者的未受影响耳朵,年龄 15 至 65 岁。
纯音听阈和颈性前庭诱发肌源性电位(cVEMP)测试的结果。
SSCD 耳朵与正常耳朵或单侧 SSCD 患者的未受影响耳朵在以下 2 个方面存在差异:1)在 250 和 500 Hz 时,它们的气骨间隙明显更大,导致这些频率的气导阈值较差;2)它们的 500 Hz cVEMP 阈值明显较低。当根据听力图上气骨间隙的大小调整 cVEMP 阈值时,与其他受试者组相比,250、500 和 1000 Hz 纯音 cVEMP 阈值明显较低。逻辑回归表明,从 cVEMP 阈值预测 SSCD 的概率具有统计学意义。SSCD 不影响 cVEMP 调谐。
将与 SSCD 相关的 2 个特征(气骨间隙和较低的 cVEMP 阈值)结合到一个变量中,即调整后的 cVEMP 阈值,可以更好地区分 SSCD 耳朵与正常或未受影响的 SSCD 耳朵。来自调整后的 cVEMP 的逻辑回归概率预测函数可能具有临床应用价值。