Noij Kimberley S, Herrmann Barbara S, Guinan John J, Rauch Steven D
Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Audiol Neurootol. 2018;23(6):335-344. doi: 10.1159/000493721. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
The cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) test measures saccular and inferior vestibular nerve function. The cVEMP can be elicited with different frequency stimuli and interpreted using a variety of metrics. Patients with superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SCD) syndrome generally have lower cVEMP thresholds and larger amplitudes, although there is overlap with healthy subjects. The aim of this study was to evaluate which metric and frequency best differentiate healthy ears from SCD ears using cVEMP.
Twenty-one patients with SCD and 23 age-matched controls were prospectively included and underwent cVEMP testing at 500, 750, 1,000 and 2,000 Hz. Sound level functions were obtained at all frequencies to acquire threshold and to calculate normalized peak-to-peak amplitude (VEMPn) and VEMP inhibition depth (VEMPid). Third window indicator (TWI) metrics were calculated by subtracting the 250-Hz air-bone gap from the ipsilateral cVEMP threshold at each frequency. Ears of SCD patients were divided into three groups based on CT imaging: dehiscent, thin or unaffected. The ears of healthy age-matched control subjects constituted a fourth group.
Comparing metrics at all frequencies revealed that 2,000-Hz stimuli were most effective in differentiating SCD from normal ears. ROC analysis indicated that for both 2,000-Hz cVEMP threshold and for 2,000-Hz TWI, 100% specificity could be achieved with a sensitivity of 92.0%. With 2,000-Hz VEMPn and VEMPid at the highest sound level, 100% specificity could be achieved with a sensitivity of 96.0%.
The best diagnostic accuracy of cVEMP in SCD patients can be achieved with 2,000-Hz tone burst stimuli, regardless of which metric is used.
颈性前庭诱发肌源性电位(cVEMP)测试用于评估球囊和前庭下神经功能。cVEMP可通过不同频率刺激引出,并使用多种指标进行解读。尽管与健康受试者存在重叠,但上半规管裂(SCD)综合征患者的cVEMP阈值通常较低,振幅较大。本研究旨在评估使用cVEMP时,哪种指标和频率能最佳地区分健康耳和SCD耳。
前瞻性纳入21例SCD患者和23例年龄匹配的对照者,并在500、750、1000和2000Hz频率下进行cVEMP测试。在所有频率下获取声级函数,以确定阈值,并计算归一化峰峰值振幅(VEMPn)和VEMP抑制深度(VEMPid)。通过从每个频率的同侧cVEMP阈值中减去250Hz气骨导差来计算第三窗指标(TWI)。根据CT成像将SCD患者的耳分为三组:裂开型、变薄型或未受影响型。年龄匹配的健康对照者的耳构成第四组。
比较所有频率下的指标发现,2000Hz刺激在区分SCD耳和正常耳方面最有效。ROC分析表明,对于2000Hz的cVEMP阈值和2000Hz的TWI,敏感性为92.0%时可实现100%的特异性。在最高声级下,2000Hz的VEMPn和VEMPid敏感性为96.0%时可实现100%的特异性。
无论使用哪种指标,2000Hz短纯音刺激在SCD患者中cVEMP的诊断准确性最高。