Ross John A, Agwanda Alfred T
Futures Group International, Washington DC, USA.
Afr J Reprod Health. 2012 Dec;16(4):68-80.
National surveys show a remarkable upsurge in the use of injectable contraceptives in east and South Africa, in contrast to central and West Africa and certain other regions. Data are analyzed here from 95 surveys conducted since 1980 in 38 sub-Saharan African countries, to determine past injectable trends in the context of alternative methods and to explore related issues. In eastern and southern countries injectable use has risen to about 15%-20% of married women, equaling about 40% of all contraceptive use, with some countries above that. Increases in total use have followed increases in injectable use; that and other evidence is clear that the injectable has not merely substituted for the use of pre-existing methods but has given a net increase to total use. Rural use patterns are not much different from urban ones; however the middle and higher wealth quintiles have especially moved toward injectable use. In west and central countries traditional methods are still paramount, with modern methods increasing slightly, but total use remains quite low there. So far no plateau has appeared in total injectable use, though one may be emerging in its share of all use as other methods also increase. Most use is supplied through the public sector, which raises long-term cost issues for health ministries and donors. Many sexually active, unmarried women use the method Discontinuation rates are quite high, and alternative methods need to be kept readily available.
全国性调查显示,与中非、西非及其他某些地区形成对比的是,东非和南非使用注射式避孕药具的情况显著增加。本文分析了自1980年以来在撒哈拉以南非洲38个国家进行的95项调查数据,以确定在有其他避孕方法的背景下过去注射式避孕药具的使用趋势,并探讨相关问题。在东部和南部国家,注射式避孕药具的使用已上升至约15% - 20%的已婚妇女,约占所有避孕方法使用的40%,有些国家高于这一比例。总使用量的增加伴随着注射式避孕药具使用量的增加;这一点以及其他证据清楚地表明,注射式避孕药具不仅替代了原有方法的使用,而且使总使用量有了净增长。农村的使用模式与城市没有太大差异;然而,中等及较高财富五分位数人群尤其倾向于使用注射式避孕药具。在西部和中部国家,传统方法仍然占主导地位,但现代方法略有增加,不过那里的总使用量仍然很低。到目前为止,注射式避孕药具的总使用量尚未出现平稳状态,尽管随着其他方法的增加,其在所有避孕方法使用中所占份额可能正在趋于平稳。大多数注射式避孕药具是通过公共部门提供的,这给卫生部和捐助方带来了长期成本问题。许多性活跃的未婚女性也使用这种方法。停用率相当高,需要随时提供替代方法。