诊断《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》：诊断分类需要根本性改革。
Diagnosing the DSM: Diagnostic Classification Needs Fundamental Reform.
作者信息
Hyman Steven E
出版信息
Cerebrum. 2011 Mar;2011:6. Epub 2011 Apr 26.
Abstract
If all goes as planned, the American Psychiatric Association will release a new Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) in May 2013. Since 1980, the DSM has provided a shared diagnostic language to clinicians, patients, scientists, school systems, courts, and pharmaceutical and insurance companies; any changes to the influential manual will have serious ramifications. But, argues Dr. Steven Hyman, the DSM is a poor mirror of clinical and biological realities; a fundamentally new approach to diagnostic classification is needed as researchers uncover novel ways to study and understand mental illness.
摘要
如果一切按计划进行，美国精神病学协会将于2013年5月发布新版《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》（DSM - 5）。自1980年以来，《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》为临床医生、患者、科学家、学校系统、法院以及制药和保险公司提供了一种通用的诊断语言；这本颇具影响力的手册的任何变化都将产生严重影响。但是，史蒂文·海曼博士认为，《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》并不能很好地反映临床和生物学现实；随着研究人员发现研究和理解精神疾病的新方法，需要一种全新的诊断分类方法。
相似文献
1
Diagnosing the DSM: Diagnostic Classification Needs Fundamental Reform.诊断《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》：诊断分类需要根本性改革。
Cerebrum. 2011 Mar;2011:6. Epub 2011 Apr 26.
2
The cycle of classification: DSM-I through DSM-5.分类周期：DSM-I 至 DSM-5。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2014;10:25-51. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153639.
3
The Evolution of the Classification of Psychiatric Disorders.精神疾病分类的演变
Behav Sci (Basel). 2016 Jan 18;6(1):5. doi: 10.3390/bs6010005.
4
Dimensional approaches to psychiatric diagnosis in DSM-5.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版（DSM-5）中精神障碍诊断的维度方法。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2011 Dec;14(4):197-200.
5
[Changes to the psychiatric diagnosis protocol].
Hu Li Za Zhi. 2014 Feb;61(1):26-31. doi: 10.6224/JN.61.1.26.
6
[An approach to DSM-5: a breakthrough in psychiatry?].[《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版：精神病学的一项突破？]
Vertex. 2014 Jan-Feb;25(113):18-26.
7
A distinct language and a historic pendulum: the evolution of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.一种独特的语言和历史的钟摆：《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》的演变。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2011 Dec;25(6):394-403. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2010.10.002. Epub 2010 Dec 30.
8
ICD-11 and DSM-5 personality trait domains capture categorical personality disorders: Finding a common ground.《ICD-11 和 DSM-5 人格特质领域能否涵盖类别性人格障碍：寻找共同点》
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2018 May;52(5):425-434. doi: 10.1177/0004867417727867. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
9
Implications of DSM-5 for Health Care Organizations and Mental Health Policy.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版对医疗保健机构及心理健康政策的影响
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2016 Autumn;39(2):217-44.
10
Classification of Psychiatric Disorders.精神障碍分类。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1192:17-25. doi: 10.1007/978-981-32-9721-0_2.
引用本文的文献
1
Neural systems underlying RDoC social constructs: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.RDoC 社会建构的神经基础系统：一项激活似然估计元分析。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023 Jan;144:104971. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104971. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
2
False dogmas in mood disorders research: Towards a nomothetic network approach.情绪障碍研究中的错误教条：迈向一种通用网络方法。
World J Psychiatry. 2022 May 19;12(5):651-667. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v12.i5.651.
3
Editorial: Biotyping in Psychiatry.社论：精神病学中的生物分型
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 2;13:844206. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.844206. eCollection 2022.
4
Decision Models and Technology Can Help Psychiatry Develop Biomarkers.决策模型与技术可助力精神病学开发生物标志物。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 9;12:706655. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.706655. eCollection 2021.
5
How to construct neuroscience-informed psychiatric classification? Towards nomothetic networks psychiatry.如何构建基于神经科学的精神疾病分类？迈向共性网络精神病学。
World J Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 19;11(1):1-12. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v11.i1.1.
6
How to Construct a Bottom-Up Nomothetic Network Model and Disclose Novel Nosological Classes by Integrating Risk Resilience and Adverse Outcome Pathways with the Phenome of Schizophrenia.如何通过整合风险复原力、不良结局途径与精神分裂症表型构建自下而上的实证性网络模型并揭示新的疾病分类。
Brain Sci. 2020 Sep 17;10(9):645. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10090645.
7
The role of RDoC in future classification of mental disorders
.RDoC 在未来精神障碍分类中的作用
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2020 Mar;22(1):81-85. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.1/bcuthbert.
8
An Overview of the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders.DSM-5 人格障碍替代模型概述。
Psychopathology. 2020;53(3-4):126-132. doi: 10.1159/000508538. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
9
Symptom-based patient stratification in mental illness using clinical notes.基于症状的精神疾病患者分层方法研究：利用临床记录。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Oct;98:103274. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103274. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
10
Advances in Psychiatric Diagnosis: Past, Present, and Future.精神科诊断的进展：过去、现在与未来。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2017 Apr 26;7(2):27. doi: 10.3390/bs7020027.
本文引用的文献
1
The structure of genetic and environmental risk factors for syndromal and subsyndromal common DSM-IV axis I and all axis II disorders.DSM-IV 轴 I 综合征和亚综合征及所有轴 II 障碍的遗传和环境风险因素的结构。
Am J Psychiatry. 2011 Jan;168(1):29-39. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10030340. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
2
Reinterpreting comorbidity: a model-based approach to understanding and classifying psychopathology.重新诠释共病现象：一种基于模型的理解和分类精神病理学的方法。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2006;2:111-33. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.2.022305.095213.
3
The diagnosis of mental disorders: the problem of reification.精神障碍的诊断：实体化问题。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010;6:155-79. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091532.
4
Can neuroscience be integrated into the DSM-V?神经科学能否被纳入《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版？
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Sep;8(9):725-32. doi: 10.1038/nrn2218.
Zotero 插件