Lee Jiyeon, Oh Heeyoung
College of Nursing, Eulji University, Daejeon, Korea. jiyeonest@hotmail.
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013 Mar;40(2):163-70. doi: 10.1188/13.ONF.163-170.
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of ginger as an antiemetic modality for the control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV).
Databases searched included MEDLINE® (PubMed), Embase, CINAHL®, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Korean Studies Information Service System, Research Information Sharing Service by the Korean Education and Research Information Service, and Dissertation Central.
A systematic review was conducted of five randomized, controlled trials involving 872 patients with cancer. Ginger was compared with placebo or metoclopramide. The participant characteristics, chemotherapy regimen and antiemetic control, ginger preparation and protocol, measurements, results of the studies, adherence to the treatment protocol, and side effects were reviewed systematically. The incidence and severity of acute and delayed CINV were subject to meta-analysis. The incidence of acute nausea (p = 0.67), incidence of acute vomiting (p = 0.37), and severity of acute nausea (p = 0.12) did not differ significantly between the ginger and control groups.
Current evidence does not support the use of ginger for the control of CINV. Ginger did not contribute to control of the incidence of acute nausea and vomiting or of the severity of acute nausea.
Ginger has long been regarded as a traditional antiemetic modality, but its effectiveness remains to be established. The findings of this study could be incorporated into clinical guidelines, such as the Oncology Nursing Society's Putting Evidence Into Practice resources. Current evidence supports the need for more methodologically rigorous studies in this area.
Although ginger is known as a traditional antiemetic, current evidence does not support the effect of ginger in CINV control. The findings of this study inform healthcare providers that its effectiveness remains to be established from methodologically rigorous future trials.
目的/目标:评估生姜作为一种止吐方式对控制化疗引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV)的效果。
检索的数据库包括MEDLINE®(PubMed)、Embase、CINAHL®、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库、韩国研究信息服务系统、韩国教育与研究信息服务机构的研究信息共享服务以及学位论文中心。
对五项涉及872例癌症患者的随机对照试验进行了系统评价。将生姜与安慰剂或甲氧氯普胺进行比较。系统回顾了参与者特征、化疗方案和止吐控制情况、生姜制剂和方案、测量方法、研究结果、对治疗方案的依从性以及副作用。对急性和延迟性CINV的发生率和严重程度进行了荟萃分析。生姜组和对照组在急性恶心发生率(p = 0.67)、急性呕吐发生率(p = = 0.37)和急性恶心严重程度(p = 0.12)方面无显著差异。
目前的证据不支持使用生姜来控制CINV。生姜对控制急性恶心和呕吐的发生率或急性恶心的严重程度并无作用。
长期以来,生姜一直被视为一种传统的止吐方式,但其有效性仍有待确定。本研究结果可纳入临床指南,如肿瘤护理学会的“将证据应用于实践”资源。目前的证据表明,该领域需要更多方法学严谨的研究。
尽管生姜作为传统止吐药广为人知,但目前的证据并不支持生姜在控制CINV方面的效果。本研究结果告知医疗服务提供者,其有效性仍有待未来方法学严谨的试验来确定。