Gurusamy Kurinchi Selvan, Kumar Senthil, Davidson Brian R
Department of Surgery, Royal Free Campus, UCLMedical School, London, UK.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;2013(2):CD008533. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008533.pub3.
The role of prophylactic gastrojejunostomy in patients with unresectable periampullary cancer is controversial.
To determine whether prophylactic gastrojejunostomy should be performed routinely in patients with unresectable periampullary cancer.
For the initial version of this review, we searched the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases Group Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2010, issue 3), MEDLINE, EMBASE and Science Citation Index Expanded until April 2010. Literature searches were re-run in August 2012.
We included randomised controlled trials comparing prophylactic gastrojejunostomy versus no gastrojejunostomy in patients with unresectable periampullary cancer (irrespective of language or publication status).
Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and independently extracted data. We analysed data with both the fixed-effect and the random-effects models using Review Manager (RevMan). We calculated the hazard ratio (HR), risk ratio (RR), and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) based on an intention-to-treat or available case analysis.
We identified two trials (of high risk of bias) involving 152 patients randomised to gastrojejunostomy (80 patients) and no gastrojejunostomy (72 patients). In both trials, patients were found to be unresectable during exploratory laparotomy. Most of the patients also underwent biliary-enteric drainage. There was no evidence of difference in the overall survival (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.84 to 1.25), peri-operative mortality or morbidity, quality of life, or hospital stay (MD 0.97 days; 95%CI -0.18 to 2.12) between the two groups. The proportion of patients who developed long-term gastric outlet obstruction was significantly lower in the prophylactic gastrojejunostomy group (2/80; 2.5%) compared with no gastrojejunostomy group (20/72; 27.8%) (RR 0.10; 95%CI 0.03 to 0.37). The operating time was significantly longer in the gastrojejunostomy group compared with no gastrojejunostomy group (MD 45.00 minutes; 95%CI 21.39 to 68.61).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Routine prophylactic gastrojejunostomy is indicated in patients with unresectable periampullary cancer undergoing exploratory laparotomy (with or without hepaticojejunostomy).
预防性胃空肠吻合术在无法切除的壶腹周围癌患者中的作用存在争议。
确定无法切除的壶腹周围癌患者是否应常规进行预防性胃空肠吻合术。
对于本综述的初始版本,我们检索了Cochrane上消化道和胰腺疾病组试验注册库、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)(Cochrane图书馆2010年第3期)、MEDLINE、EMBASE和科学引文索引扩展版,检索截至2010年4月。2012年8月重新进行了文献检索。
我们纳入了比较无法切除的壶腹周围癌患者预防性胃空肠吻合术与不进行胃空肠吻合术的随机对照试验(无论语言或发表状态如何)。
两位综述作者独立评估试验是否纳入并独立提取数据。我们使用Review Manager(RevMan)软件,采用固定效应模型和随机效应模型对数据进行分析。基于意向性分析或可用病例分析,我们计算了风险比(HR)、相对危险度(RR)和平均差(MD)以及95%置信区间(CI)。
我们确定了两项试验(偏倚风险高),涉及152例患者,随机分为胃空肠吻合术组(80例患者)和非胃空肠吻合术组(72例患者)。在两项试验中,患者在剖腹探查术中均被发现无法切除。大多数患者还接受了胆肠引流。两组之间在总生存期(HR 1.02;95%CI 0.84至1.25)、围手术期死亡率或发病率、生活质量或住院时间(MD 0.97天;95%CI -0.18至2.12)方面均无差异。预防性胃空肠吻合术组发生长期胃出口梗阻的患者比例(2/80;2.5%)显著低于非胃空肠吻合术组(20/72;27.8%)(RR 0.10;95%CI 0.03至0.37)。胃空肠吻合术组的手术时间显著长于非胃空肠吻合术组(MD 45.00分钟;95%CI 21.39至68.61)。
对于接受剖腹探查术(无论是否进行肝空肠吻合术)的无法切除的壶腹周围癌患者,建议常规进行预防性胃空肠吻合术。