Kaye J J, Fuchs H A, Moseley J W, Nance E P, Callahan L F, Pincus T
Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Invest Radiol. 1990 May;25(5):536-44. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199005000-00011.
Hand and wrist radiographs of 202 patients with rheumatoid arthritis were graded with the classical Steinbrocker Staging System, and were also assigned quantitative scores for joint space narrowing, erosion, and malalignment according to a detailed scoring method. Steinbrocker Stage scores were correlated significantly with total detailed scores (r = 0.60 to 0.66, P less than 0.001). However, the ranges of detailed total and subtotal scores among the various Steinbrocker Stage scores were broad, with considerable overlap. Practical problems in applying the Steinbrocker staging method were identified in 26.5% of the hands graded with the Steinbrocker method. Additionally, analysis of scoring data showed discrepancies between the scoring methods in 25.2% of the hands examined; one-half of these discrepancies were felt to result from the global or overall approach of the Steinbrocker method in contrast to individual joint analysis. Asymmetry in assigned stages between right and left hands was found in 15.8% of patients. The detailed scoring method, although more time-consuming, appears superior to the Steinbrocker Stage for quantitative assessment of patient radiographic status in rheumatoid arthritis.
对202例类风湿关节炎患者的手部和腕部X光片,采用经典的斯坦布鲁克分期系统进行分级,并根据一种详细的评分方法对关节间隙变窄、侵蚀和排列不齐情况给出量化分数。斯坦布鲁克分期分数与详细总分显著相关(r = 0.60至0.66,P小于0.001)。然而,不同斯坦布鲁克分期分数的详细总分及分项分数范围较宽,有相当程度的重叠。在用斯坦布鲁克方法分级的手部中,26.5%发现了应用斯坦布鲁克分期方法的实际问题。此外,评分数据分析显示,在25.2%的受检手部中,两种评分方法存在差异;其中一半的差异被认为是由于斯坦布鲁克方法采用整体或全局方式,而非对单个关节进行分析所致。15.8%的患者双手的分期存在不对称情况。这种详细评分方法虽然耗时更多,但在类风湿关节炎患者X光影像状态的定量评估方面似乎优于斯坦布鲁克分期。