Department of Global Health Policy, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56873. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056873. Epub 2013 Feb 25.
Bangladesh has a high proportion of households incurring catastrophic health expenditure, and very limited risk sharing mechanisms. Identifying determinants of out-of-pocket (OOP) payments and catastrophic health expenditure may reveal opportunities to reduce costs and protect households from financial risk.
This study investigates the determinants of high healthcare expenditure and healthcare- related financial catastrophe.
A cross-sectional household survey was conducted in Rajshahi city, Bangladesh, in 2011. Catastrophic health expenditure was estimated separately based on capacity to pay and proportion of non-food expenditure. Determinants of OOP payments and financial catastrophe were estimated using double hurdle and Poisson regression models respectively.
On average households spent 11% of their total budgets on health, half the residents spent 7% of the monthly per capita consumption expenditure for one illness, and nearly 9% of households faced financial catastrophe. The poorest households spent less on health but had a four times higher risk of catastrophe than the richest households. The risk of financial catastrophe and the level of OOP payments were higher for users of inpatient, outpatient public and private facilities respectively compared to using self-medication or traditional healers. Other determinants of OOP payments and catastrophic expenses were economic status, presence of chronic illness in the household, and illness among children and adults.
Households that received inpatient or outpatient private care experienced the highest burden of health expenditure. The poorest members of the community also face large, often catastrophic expenses. Chronic illness management is crucial to reducing the total burden of disease in a household and its associated increased risk of level of OOP payments and catastrophic expenses. Households can only be protected from these situations by reducing the health system's dependency on OOP payments and providing more financial risk protection.
孟加拉国发生灾难性医疗支出的家庭比例较高,但风险分担机制非常有限。确定自付费用和灾难性医疗支出的决定因素可能会发现降低成本和保护家庭免受财务风险的机会。
本研究旨在调查高额医疗支出和与医疗相关的财务灾难的决定因素。
2011 年在孟加拉国拉杰沙希市进行了一项横断面家庭调查。根据支付能力和非食品支出比例,分别估算灾难性医疗支出。使用双门槛和泊松回归模型分别估计自付费用和财务灾难的决定因素。
平均而言,家庭将其总预算的 11%用于医疗保健,一半居民将每月人均消费支出的 7%用于一次疾病,近 9%的家庭面临财务灾难。最贫困的家庭在医疗保健方面的支出较少,但面临灾难的风险是最富裕家庭的四倍。与使用自我医疗或传统治疗师相比,使用住院、门诊公共和私人设施的家庭面临更高的财务灾难风险和更高水平的自付费用。自付费用和灾难性支出的其他决定因素包括经济状况、家庭中是否存在慢性病以及儿童和成人的疾病。
接受住院或门诊私人护理的家庭经历了最高的医疗支出负担。社区中最贫困的成员也面临着巨大的、往往是灾难性的支出。慢性病管理对于减轻家庭疾病总负担及其相关自付费用和灾难性支出风险至关重要。只有通过减少医疗体系对自付费用的依赖并提供更多的财务风险保护,才能保护家庭免受这些情况的影响。