Suppr超能文献

应用磁敏感加权成像评估肾细胞癌出血。

Evaluating hemorrhage in renal cell carcinoma using susceptibility weighted imaging.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Affiliated Third Hospital of Suzhou University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057691. Epub 2013 Feb 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intratumoral hemorrhage is a frequent occurrence in renal cell carcinoma and is an indicator of tumor subtype. We hypothesize that susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) is sensitive to hemorrhage in renal cell carcinoma and can give a more diagnostic image when compared to conventional imaging techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 32 patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma was evaluated. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 22 out of 32 patients also underwent a computed tomography (CT) scan. Hemorrhage was classified into 3 different categories according to shape and distribution. Histopathology was obtained from all masses by radical nephrectomy. The ability to detect the presence of hemorrhage using CT, non-contrast conventional MRI and SWI was evaluated, and the patterns of hemorrhage were compared.

RESULTS

Using pathologic results as the gold standard, the sensitivities of non-contrast conventional MRI, SWI and CT in detecting hemorrhage in clear cell renal cell carcinoma were 65.6%, 100% and 22.7%, respectively. Accuracy of non-contrast conventional MRI and SWI in evaluating hemorrhagic patterns were 31.3% and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate that SWI can better reveal hemorrhage and characterize the pattern more accurately than either non-contrast conventional MRI or CT. This suggests that SWI is the technique of choice for detecting hemorrhagic lesions in patients with renal cancer.

摘要

背景

肿瘤内出血是肾细胞癌的常见现象,也是肿瘤亚型的一个指标。我们假设磁化率加权成像(SWI)对肾细胞癌出血敏感,与常规成像技术相比,SWI 可以提供更具诊断性的图像。

材料与方法

回顾性分析了 32 例透明细胞肾细胞癌患者。所有患者均接受了磁共振成像(MRI)检查,其中 22 例患者还接受了计算机断层扫描(CT)检查。根据形状和分布,将出血分为 3 种不同类型。所有肿块均通过根治性肾切除术获得组织病理学结果。评估 CT、非对比常规 MRI 和 SWI 检测肾透明细胞癌出血的能力,并比较出血模式。

结果

以病理结果为金标准,非对比常规 MRI、SWI 和 CT 检测肾透明细胞癌出血的敏感性分别为 65.6%、100%和 22.7%。非对比常规 MRI 和 SWI 评估出血模式的准确性分别为 31.3%和 100%。

结论

这些结果表明,SWI 可以比非对比常规 MRI 或 CT 更好地显示出血并更准确地描述出血模式。这表明 SWI 是检测肾肿瘤患者出血病变的首选技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76c4/3581533/7b488650ba94/pone.0057691.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验