Akyüz Filiz, An Yoon Kyo, Begun Jakob, Aniwan Satimai, Bui Huu Hoang, Chan Webber, Choi Chang Hwan, Chopdat Nazeer, Connor Susan J, Desai Devendra, Flanagan Emma, Kobayashi Taku, Lai Allen Yu-Hung, Leong Rupert W, Leow Alex Hwong-Ruey, Leung Wai Keung, Limsrivilai Julajak, Muzellina Virly Nanda, Peddi Kiran, Ran Zhihua, Wei Shu Chen, Sollano Jose, Teo Michelle Mui Hian, Wu Kaichun, Ye Byong Duk, Ooi Choon Jin
Department of Gastroenterology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Department of Gastroenterology, Mater Hospital Brisbane, Brisbane, Australia.
Intest Res. 2025 Jan;23(1):37-55. doi: 10.5217/ir.2024.00089. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
The lack of clear definition and classification for "moderate ulcerative colitis (UC)" creates ambiguity regarding the suitability of step-up versus top-down treatment approaches. In this paper, experts address crucial gaps in assessing and managing moderate UC. The Asia-Pacific, Middle East, and Africa Inflammatory Bowel Disease Coalition comprised 24 experts who convened to share, discuss and vote electronically on management recommendations for moderate UC. Experts emphasized that the goal of treating UC is to attain clinical, biomarker, and endoscopic remission using cost-effective strategies such as 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASAs), well-tolerated therapy that can be optimized to improve outcomes. Experts agreed that 5-ASA therapy could be optimized by maximizing dosage (4 g/day for induction of remission), combining oral and topical administration, extending treatment duration beyond 8 weeks, and enhancing patient adherence through personalized counselling and reduced pill burden. Treatment escalation should ideally be reserved for patients with predictors of aggressive disease or those who do not respond to 5-ASA optimization. Premature treatment escalation to advanced therapies (including biologics and oral small molecules) may have long-term health and financial consequences. This paper provides consensus-based expert recommendations and a treatment algorithm, based on current evidence and practices, to assist decision-making in real-world settings.
“中度溃疡性结肠炎(UC)”缺乏明确的定义和分类,这使得逐步治疗与自上而下治疗方法的适用性存在模糊性。在本文中,专家们探讨了评估和管理中度UC方面的关键差距。亚太、中东和非洲炎症性肠病联盟由24位专家组成,他们齐聚一堂,就中度UC的管理建议进行电子分享、讨论和投票。专家们强调,治疗UC的目标是采用具有成本效益的策略,如5-氨基水杨酸(5-ASA),实现临床、生物标志物和内镜缓解,这种耐受性良好的疗法可进行优化以改善治疗效果。专家们一致认为,5-ASA疗法可通过以下方式进行优化:最大化剂量(诱导缓解时为4克/天)、联合口服和局部给药、将治疗时间延长至8周以上,以及通过个性化咨询和减轻药丸负担来提高患者依从性。理想情况下,治疗升级应仅用于具有侵袭性疾病预测因素的患者或对5-ASA优化无反应的患者。过早升级至先进疗法(包括生物制剂和口服小分子药物)可能会产生长期健康和经济后果。本文基于当前证据和实践,提供了基于共识的专家建议和治疗算法,以协助实际临床环境中的决策制定。