University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur Urol. 2013 Aug;64(2):204-15. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.02.024. Epub 2013 Feb 22.
Delaying definitive therapy unfavourably affects outcomes in many malignancies. Diagnostic, psychological, and logistical reasons but also active surveillance (AS) strategies can lead to treatment delay, an increase in the interval between the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer (PCa).
To review and summarise the current literature on the impact of treatment delay on PCa oncologic outcomes.
A comprehensive search of PubMed and Embase databases until 30 September 2012 was performed. Studies comparing pathologic, biochemical recurrence (BCR), and mortality outcomes between patients receiving direct and delayed curative treatment were included. Studies presenting single-arm results following AS were excluded.
Seventeen studies were included: 13 on radical prostatectomy, 3 on radiation therapy, and 1 combined both. A total of 34 517 PCa patients receiving radical local therapy between 1981 and 2009 were described. Some studies included low-risk PCa only; others included a wider spectrum of disease. Four studies found a significant effect of treatment delay on outcomes in multivariate analysis. Two included low-risk patients only, but it was unknown whether AS was applied or repeat biopsy triggered active therapy during AS. The two other studies found a negative effect on BCR rates of 2.5-9 mo delay in higher risk patients (respectively defined as any with T ≥ 2b, prostate-specific antigen >10, Gleason score >6, >34-50% positive cores; or D'Amico intermediate risk-group). All studies were retrospective and nonrandomised. Reasons for delay were not always clear, and time-to-event analyses may be subject to bias.
Treatment delay of several months or even years does not appear to affect outcomes of men with low-risk PCa. Limited data suggest treatment delay may have an impact on men with non-low-risk PCa. Most AS protocols suggest a confirmatory biopsy to avoid delaying treatment in those who harbour higher risk disease that was initially misclassified.
在许多恶性肿瘤中,延迟确定性治疗会对结果产生不利影响。诊断、心理和后勤方面的原因,以及主动监测(AS)策略,都可能导致治疗延迟,即前列腺癌(PCa)的诊断和治疗之间的间隔时间增加。
综述和总结目前关于治疗延迟对 PCa 肿瘤学结果影响的文献。
对 PubMed 和 Embase 数据库进行了全面检索,检索时间截至 2012 年 9 月 30 日。纳入了比较直接和延迟根治性治疗患者的病理、生化复发(BCR)和死亡率结果的研究。排除了仅报告 AS 后单臂结果的研究。
纳入了 17 项研究:13 项关于根治性前列腺切除术,3 项关于放射治疗,1 项同时包含两者。共描述了 34517 例 1981 年至 2009 年接受根治性局部治疗的 PCa 患者。一些研究仅包括低危 PCa;其他研究则包括更广泛的疾病谱。四项研究在多变量分析中发现治疗延迟对结果有显著影响。其中两项研究仅包括低危患者,但尚不清楚是否应用了 AS,或者 AS 期间重复活检是否触发了主动治疗。另外两项研究发现,高危患者(分别定义为任何 T≥2b、前列腺特异性抗原>10、Gleason 评分>6、≥34-50%阳性核心;或 D'Amico 中危组)2.5-9 个月的延迟会对 BCR 率产生负面影响。所有研究均为回顾性且非随机的。延迟的原因并不总是清楚,并且时间事件分析可能存在偏倚。
几个月甚至几年的治疗延迟似乎不会影响低危 PCa 患者的结局。有限的数据表明,治疗延迟可能对非低危 PCa 患者有影响。大多数 AS 方案建议进行确认性活检,以避免在最初分类错误的那些隐匿高危疾病患者中延迟治疗。