• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

报告中提到的在慢性病护理评估方面存在的障碍:六个欧洲国家的经验。

Reported barriers to evaluation in chronic care: experiences in six European countries.

机构信息

London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H9SH, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2013 May;110(2-3):220-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.01.019. Epub 2013 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.01.019
PMID:23453595
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The growing movement of innovative approaches to chronic disease management in Europe has not been matched by a corresponding effort to evaluate them. This paper discusses challenges to evaluation of chronic disease management as reported by experts in six European countries.

METHODS

We conducted 42 semi-structured interviews with key informants from Austria, Denmark, France, Germany, The Netherlands and Spain involved in decision-making and implementation of chronic disease management approaches. Interviews were complemented by a survey on approaches to chronic disease management in each country. Finally two project teams (France and the Netherlands) conducted in-depth case studies on various aspects of chronic care evaluation.

RESULTS

We identified three common challenges to evaluation of chronic disease management approaches: (1) a lack of evaluation culture and related shortage of capacity; (2) reluctance of payers or providers to engage in evaluation and (3) practical challenges around data and the heterogeity of IT infrastructure. The ability to evaluate chronic disease management interventions is influenced by contextual and cultural factors.

CONCLUSIONS

This study contributes to our understanding of some of the most common underlying barriers to chronic care evaluation by highlighting the views and experiences of stakeholders and experts in six European countries. Overcoming the cultural, political and structural barriers to evaluation should be driven by payers and providers, for example by building in incentives such as feedback on performance, aligning financial incentives with programme objectives, collectively participating in designing an appropriate framework for evaluation, and making data use and accessibility consistent with data protection policies.

摘要

简介

在欧洲,慢性病管理的创新方法不断涌现,但对这些方法的评估却没有相应的努力。本文讨论了六位来自奥地利、丹麦、法国、德国、荷兰和西班牙的专家报告的慢性病管理评估面临的挑战。

方法

我们对参与慢性病管理方法决策和实施的 6 个欧洲国家的关键信息提供者进行了 42 次半结构化访谈。访谈以每个国家慢性病管理方法的调查为补充。最后,两个项目团队(法国和荷兰)对慢性病评估的各个方面进行了深入的案例研究。

结果

我们确定了慢性病管理方法评估的三个共同挑战:(1)缺乏评估文化和相关能力的短缺;(2)支付者或提供者不愿参与评估;(3)数据方面的实际挑战以及 IT 基础设施的异质性。评估慢性病管理干预措施的能力受到背景和文化因素的影响。

结论

本研究通过突出来自六个欧洲国家的利益相关者和专家的观点和经验,为我们了解慢性病评估最常见的一些潜在障碍做出了贡献。克服评估的文化、政治和结构障碍应该由支付者和提供者来推动,例如通过建立反馈绩效等激励措施、使财务激励与方案目标保持一致、共同参与设计适当的评估框架、以及使数据使用和可及性与数据保护政策保持一致。

相似文献

1
Reported barriers to evaluation in chronic care: experiences in six European countries.报告中提到的在慢性病护理评估方面存在的障碍:六个欧洲国家的经验。
Health Policy. 2013 May;110(2-3):220-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.01.019. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
2
Overcoming fragmentation in health care: chronic care in Austria, Germany and The Netherlands.克服医疗碎片化:奥地利、德国和荷兰的慢性护理
Health Econ Policy Law. 2012 Jan;7(1):125-46. doi: 10.1017/S1744133111000338.
3
Identifying organisational principles and management practices important to the quality of health care services for chronic conditions.确定对慢性病医疗服务质量至关重要的组织原则和管理实践。
Dan Med J. 2012 Feb;59(2):B4387.
4
Exploring payment schemes used to promote integrated chronic care in Europe.探索欧洲用于促进综合慢性病护理的支付方案。
Health Policy. 2013 Dec;113(3):296-304. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.07.007. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
5
Approaches to chronic disease management evaluation in use in Europe: a review of current methods and performance measures.欧洲现行的慢性病管理评估方法:对当前方法和绩效指标的综述。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013 Jan;29(1):61-70. doi: 10.1017/S0266462312000700. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
6
Meso level influences on long term condition self-management: stakeholder accounts of commonalities and differences across six European countries.中观层面对长期疾病自我管理的影响:六个欧洲国家利益相关者关于共性与差异的描述
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 8;15:622. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1957-1.
7
Preparing primary care for the future - perspectives from the Netherlands, England, and USA.为未来的初级医疗保健做准备——来自荷兰、英国和美国的观点。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(8):571-80. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.09.029. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
8
Explaining differences in stakeholder take up of disease management programmes: A comparative analysis of policy implementation in Austria and Germany.解释利益相关者对疾病管理项目接受程度的差异:奥地利和德国政策实施的比较分析。
Health Policy. 2016 Mar;120(3):281-92. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
9
The Netherlands: health system review.荷兰:卫生系统综述。
Health Syst Transit. 2010;12(1):v-xxvii, 1-228.
10
Educating to improve population health outcomes in chronic disease: an innovative workforce initiative across remote, rural and Indigenous communities in northern Australia.开展教育以改善慢性病患者的群体健康状况:澳大利亚北部偏远、农村和原住民社区的一项创新型劳动力计划。
Rural Remote Health. 2006 Jul-Sep;6(3):606. Epub 2006 Aug 15.

引用本文的文献

1
The co-production process of an assessment programme: Between clarifying identity and developing the quality of French-speaking Belgian community health centres.评估项目的共同制定过程:在明确身份和提高法语比利时社区健康中心的质量之间。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Feb 20;22(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01112-y.
2
Direct and Indirect Costs Related to Physical Activity Levels in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus in Spain: A Cross-Sectional Study.西班牙糖尿病患者身体活动水平相关的直接和间接成本:一项横断面研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Apr 18;10(4):752. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10040752.
3
Evaluating the Impact of the Diabetes Mellitus Strategy for the National Health System: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis.
评估糖尿病策略对国家卫生系统的影响:一项中断时间序列分析。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jul 12;9(7):873. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9070873.
4
Population Health and Health Services: Old Challenges and New Realities in the COVID-19 Era.人口健康与卫生服务:新冠疫情时代的旧挑战与新现实。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 9;18(4):1658. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041658.
5
Lessons from the Implementation of Pilot Practices to Tackle the Burden of Noncommunicable Diseases in Europe.欧洲应对非传染性疾病负担的试点实践经验教训。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 29;17(13):4661. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134661.
6
Methodological Quality of Economic Evaluations in Integrated Care: Evidence from a Systematic Review.综合医疗中经济评估的方法学质量:系统评价证据
Int J Integr Care. 2019 Sep 9;19(3):17. doi: 10.5334/ijic.4675.
7
The importance of health insurance claims data in creating learning health systems: evaluating care for high-need high-cost patients using the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORNet).健康保险理赔数据在创建学习型医疗体系中的重要性:利用全国以患者为中心的临床研究网络(PCORNet)评估高需求高费用患者的护理。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Nov 1;26(11):1305-1313. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz097.
8
Systems Thinking as a Framework for Analyzing Commercial Determinants of Health.系统思维作为分析商业健康决定因素的框架。
Milbank Q. 2018 Sep;96(3):472-498. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12339.
9
How do health care workers manage a patient with multiple care needs from both health and social care services? - A vignette study.医护人员如何管理一位同时需要健康和社会护理服务的多需求患者?——一项案例研究。
Int J Care Coord. 2018 Jun;21(1-2):5-14. doi: 10.1177/2053434517744070. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
10
Analysing a Chinese Regional Integrated Healthcare Organisation Reform Failure using a Complex Adaptive System Approach.运用复杂适应系统方法分析中国某地区综合医疗保健组织改革的失败案例
Int J Integr Care. 2017 Jun 19;17(2):3. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2420.