Suppr超能文献

腔隙性卒中和认知障碍:发生率、患病率的系统评价和荟萃分析,以及与其他卒中亚型的比较。

Cognitive impairment after lacunar stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis of incidence, prevalence and comparison with other stroke subtypes.

机构信息

Division of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Edinburgh, Bramwell Dott Building, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK.

出版信息

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;84(8):893-900. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-303645. Epub 2013 Mar 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cognitive impairment and dementia are common after stroke. It is unclear if risk differs between ischaemic stroke subtypes. Lacunar strokes might be less likely to affect cognition than more severe, larger cortical strokes, except that lacunar strokes are associated with cerebral small vessel disease (SVD), which is the commonest vascular cause of dementia.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and PsychINFO for studies of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia after lacunar or cortical ischaemic stroke. We calculated the OR for cognitive impairment/dementia in lacunar versus non-lacunar stroke, and their incidence and prevalence in lacunar stroke as a pooled proportion.

FINDINGS

We identified 24 relevant studies of 7575 patients, including 2860 with lacunar stroke; 24% had MCI or dementia post stroke. Similar proportions of patients with lacunar and non-lacunar stroke (16 studies, n=6478) had MCI or dementia up to 4 years after stroke (OR 0.72 (95% CI 0.43 to 1.20)). The prevalence of dementia after lacunar stroke (six studies, n=1421) was 20% (95% CI 9 to 33) and the incidence of MCI or dementia (four studies, n=275) was 37% (95% CI 23 to 53). Data were limited by short follow-up, subtype classification methods and confounding.

INTERPRETATION

Cognitive impairment appears to be common after lacunar strokes despite their small size, suggesting that associated SVD may increase their impact. New prospective studies are required with accurate stroke subtyping to assess long term outcomes while accounting for confounders.

摘要

背景

认知障碍和痴呆在中风后很常见。缺血性中风亚型之间的风险是否不同尚不清楚。腔隙性中风可能不像更严重、更大的皮质性中风那样影响认知,除非腔隙性中风与脑小血管疾病(SVD)有关,而 SVD 是痴呆最常见的血管原因。

方法

我们在 MEDLINE 和 PsychINFO 上搜索了腔隙性或皮质性缺血性中风后轻度认知障碍(MCI)或痴呆的研究。我们计算了腔隙性与非腔隙性中风之间认知障碍/痴呆的比值比(OR),以及腔隙性中风中认知障碍/痴呆的发生率和患病率作为汇总比例。

结果

我们确定了 7575 例患者的 24 项相关研究,包括 2860 例腔隙性中风患者;24%的患者中风后出现 MCI 或痴呆。有腔隙性和非腔隙性中风的患者(16 项研究,n=6478)在中风后 4 年内出现 MCI 或痴呆的比例相似(OR 0.72(95%CI 0.43 至 1.20))。腔隙性中风后痴呆的患病率(六项研究,n=1421)为 20%(95%CI 9 至 33),MCI 或痴呆的发病率(四项研究,n=275)为 37%(95%CI 23 至 53)。数据受到随访时间短、亚型分类方法和混杂因素的限制。

解释

尽管腔隙性中风体积较小,但认知障碍似乎在中风后很常见,这表明相关的 SVD 可能会增加其影响。需要进行新的前瞻性研究,对中风亚型进行准确分类,以评估长期预后,同时考虑混杂因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21de/3717603/7caa3d96d37b/jnnp-2012-303645f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验