Wiseman Stewart, Marlborough Fergal, Doubal Fergus, Webb David J, Wardlaw Joanna
Brain Research Imaging Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;37(1):64-75. doi: 10.1159/000356789. Epub 2013 Dec 21.
The cause of cerebral small vessel disease is not fully understood, yet it is important, accounting for about 25% of all strokes. It also increases the risk of having another stroke and contributes to about 40% of dementias. Various processes have been implicated, including microatheroma, endothelial dysfunction and inflammation. A previous review investigated endothelial dysfunction in lacunar stroke versus mostly non-stroke controls while another looked at markers of inflammation and endothelial damage in ischaemic stroke in general. We have focused on blood markers between clinically evident lacunar stroke and other subtypes of ischaemic stroke, thereby controlling for stroke in general.
We systematically assessed the literature for studies comparing blood markers of coagulation, fibrinolysis, endothelial dysfunction and inflammation in lacunar stroke versus non-stroke controls or other ischaemic stroke subtypes. We assessed the quality of included papers and meta-analysed results. We split the analysis on time of blood draw in relation to the stroke. We identified 1,468 full papers of which 42 were eligible for inclusion, including 4,816 ischaemic strokes, of which 2,196 were lacunar and 2,500 non-stroke controls. Most studies subtyped stroke using TOAST. The definition of lacunar stroke varied between studies. Markers of coagulation/fibrinolysis (tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI), fibrinogen, D-dimer) were higher in lacunar stroke versus non-stroke although fibrinogen was no different to non-stroke in the acute phase. tPA and PAI were no different between lacunar and non-lacunar stroke. Fibrinogen and D-dimer were significantly lower in lacunar stroke compared to other ischaemic strokes, both acutely and chronically. Markers of endothelial dysfunction (homocysteine, von Willebrand Factor (vWF), E-selectin, P-selectin, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM), vascular cellular adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM)) were higher or had insufficient or conflicting data (P-selectin, VCAM) in lacunar stroke versus non-stroke. Compared to other ischaemic stroke subtypes, homocysteine did not differ in lacunar stroke while vWF was significantly lower in lacunar stroke acutely [atherothrombotic standardized mean difference, SMD, -0.34 (-0.61, -0.08); cardioembolic SMD -0.38 (-0.62, -0.14)], with insufficient data chronically. Markers of inflammation (C-reactive protein (CRP), tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6)) were higher in lacunar stroke versus non-stroke, although there were no studies measuring TNF-α chronically and the sole study measuring IL-6 chronically showed no difference between lacunar stroke and non-stroke. Compared to other ischaemic stroke subtypes, there was no difference (CRP) or insufficient or conflicting data (TNF-α) to lacunar stroke. IL-6 was significantly lower [atherothrombotic SMD -0.37 (-0.63, -0.10); cardioembolic SMD -0.52 (-0.82, -0.22)] in lacunar stroke acutely, with insufficient data chronically.
Lacunar stroke is an important stroke subtype. More studies comparing lacunar stroke to non-lacunar stroke specifically, rather than to non-stroke controls, are needed. Prospective studies with measurements taken well after the acute event are more likely to be helpful in determining pathogenesis. The available data in this review were limited and do not exclude the possibility that peripheral inflammatory processes including endothelial dysfunction are associated with lacunar stroke and cerebral small vessel disease.
脑小血管病的病因尚未完全明确,但它很重要,约占所有中风的25%。它还会增加再次中风的风险,约40%的痴呆症与之相关。涉及多种病理过程,包括微动脉粥样硬化、内皮功能障碍和炎症。此前一项综述研究了腔隙性中风与大多为非中风对照者之间的内皮功能障碍,另一项综述则总体上研究了缺血性中风中的炎症和内皮损伤标志物。我们聚焦于临床明显的腔隙性中风与其他缺血性中风亚型之间的血液标志物,从而总体上对中风进行对照研究。
我们系统检索了文献,以查找比较腔隙性中风与非中风对照者或其他缺血性中风亚型的凝血、纤维蛋白溶解、内皮功能障碍和炎症血液标志物的研究。我们评估了纳入论文的质量并对结果进行荟萃分析。我们根据抽血时间与中风的关系进行分析。我们共识别出1468篇全文,其中42篇符合纳入标准[,包括4816例缺血性中风,其中2196例为腔隙性中风,2500例为非中风对照者。大多数研究使用TOAST对中风进行亚型分类。腔隙性中风的定义在不同研究中有所不同。与非中风对照者相比,腔隙性中风的凝血/纤维蛋白溶解标志物(组织型纤溶酶原激活物(tPA)、纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂(PAI)、纤维蛋白原、D - 二聚体)更高,不过纤维蛋白原在急性期与非中风对照者无差异。腔隙性中风与非腔隙性中风之间tPA和PAI无差异。与其他缺血性中风相比,腔隙性中风的纤维蛋白原和D - 二聚体在急性期和慢性期均显著更低。与非中风对照者相比,腔隙性中风的内皮功能障碍标志物(同型半胱氨酸、血管性血友病因子(vWF)、E - 选择素、P - 选择素、细胞间黏附分子 - 1(ICAM)、血管细胞黏附分子 - 1(VCAM))更高,或数据不足或相互矛盾(P - 选择素、VCAM)。与其他缺血性中风亚型相比,腔隙性中风中的同型半胱氨酸无差异,而vWF在急性期显著更低[动脉粥样硬化血栓形成标准化均数差(SMD),-0.34(-0.61,-0.08);心源性栓塞SMD -0.38(-0.62,-0.14)],慢性期数据不足。与非中风对照者相比,腔隙性中风的炎症标志物(C反应蛋白(CRP)、肿瘤坏死因子 - α(TNF - α)、白细胞介素 - 6(IL - 6))更高,不过没有研究长期测量TNF - α,唯一一项长期测量IL - 6的研究显示腔隙性中风与非中风对照者之间无差异。与其他缺血性中风亚型相比,腔隙性中风中的CRP无差异(或数据不足或相互矛盾(TNF - α)。IL - 6在急性期显著更低[动脉粥样硬化血栓形成SMD -0.37(-0.63,-0.10);心源性栓塞SMD -0.52(-0.82,-0.22)],慢性期数据不足。
腔隙性中风是一种重要的中风亚型。需要更多专门比较腔隙性中风与非腔隙性中风而非非中风对照者的研究。在急性事件后很久进行测量的前瞻性研究更有助于确定发病机制。本综述中的现有数据有限,并不排除包括内皮功能障碍在内的外周炎症过程与腔隙性中风和脑小血管病相关的可能性。