Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina 27858-4353, USA.
Int J Audiol. 2013 Jun;52(6):413-8. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.770567. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
The purpose of this study was to measure real-ear aided and saturated responses of SpeechEasy™ devices and compare responses while devices delivered altered auditory feedback (AAF) and non-altered feedback (NAF).
A repeated measures quasi-experimental design was employed.
Ten people fitted with completely-in-the-canal or open fit behind-the-ear devices participated. Probe microphone measures were obtained with speech, and 17 chirp stimuli presented at 75 dB and 85 dB SPL, respectively. Measurements were compared with devices delivering AAF (i.e. delayed and frequency shifted) versus NAF.
Maximum outputs were approximately 100-105 dB SPL in the 2000-4000 Hz range. Statistically significant differences in device SPL output as a function of device setting (AAF vs. NAF) were found for seven chirp stimuli (p <.05) when levels were sampled at points that were not temporally aligned with the output chirps but not for speech stimulus (p = .17). Device output varied across individuals and with open fit devices dominated by ear canal resonance effects.
Real-ear aided responses were equivalent with speech input when devices delivered AAF and NAF. Real-ear saturated responses were not, however, comparable between AAF and NAF settings and may be underestimated if AAF delay is not accounted for.
本研究旨在测量 SpeechEasy™ 设备的真耳助听和饱和响应,并比较设备提供改变的听觉反馈 (AAF) 和未改变的听觉反馈 (NAF) 时的响应。
采用重复测量的准实验设计。
10 名佩戴完全耳道式或开放式耳后设备的人参与了研究。使用语音和 17 个啁啾刺激物(分别在 75dB 和 85dB SPL 下呈现)获得探针麦克风测量值。将测量值与提供 AAF(即延迟和频率偏移)与 NAF 的设备进行比较。
在 2000-4000Hz 范围内,最大输出约为 100-105dB SPL。当在与输出啁啾不同时的时间点采样时,七种啁啾刺激(p<.05)的设备 SPL 输出随设备设置(AAF 与 NAF)的差异具有统计学意义,但对于语音刺激(p=.17)则没有。设备输出因人而异,开放式设备主要受耳道共振效应的影响。
当设备提供 AAF 和 NAF 时,真耳助听响应与语音输入相当。然而,真耳饱和响应在 AAF 和 NAF 设置之间不可比,如果不考虑 AAF 延迟,可能会低估。